From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: autofs@linux.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>, Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] autofs/autofs4: move compat_ioctl handling into fs
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 13:12:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C323CAD.1070602@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100705195837.GF5240@nowhere>
On 07/05/2010 12:58 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 09:52:55PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Monday 05 July 2010 21:48:01 Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 12:42:59PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>>> On 07/05/2010 12:24 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Peter, if you're fine with this version. May I apply it?
>>>>> Unless you have a tree for autofs.
>>>>>
>>>> Ian Kent is the maintainer of autofs4 and patches for autofs4 should go
>>>> through him (or acked by him.)
>>>>
>>>> autofs 3 is officially unmaintained; I'm more than happy to have you
>>>> push the autofs 3 bits of this patch.
>>>
>>> Sure, I can split up the patch and integrate the autofs 3 part, I'll send
>>> the standalone autofs4 version to Ian.
>>
>> I think in this case it's really more appropriate to change both autofs3
>> and autofs4 together, to avoid interdependencies. Whichever way Ian
>> prefers (ack the patch or take it) would work though.
>>
>> Arnd
>
>
> Yeah indeed. Ian?
>
For what it's worth, feel free to add my:
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
autofs@linux.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] autofs/autofs4: move compat_ioctl handling into fs
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 13:12:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C323CAD.1070602@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100705195837.GF5240@nowhere>
On 07/05/2010 12:58 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 09:52:55PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Monday 05 July 2010 21:48:01 Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 12:42:59PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>>> On 07/05/2010 12:24 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Peter, if you're fine with this version. May I apply it?
>>>>> Unless you have a tree for autofs.
>>>>>
>>>> Ian Kent is the maintainer of autofs4 and patches for autofs4 should go
>>>> through him (or acked by him.)
>>>>
>>>> autofs 3 is officially unmaintained; I'm more than happy to have you
>>>> push the autofs 3 bits of this patch.
>>>
>>> Sure, I can split up the patch and integrate the autofs 3 part, I'll send
>>> the standalone autofs4 version to Ian.
>>
>> I think in this case it's really more appropriate to change both autofs3
>> and autofs4 together, to avoid interdependencies. Whichever way Ian
>> prefers (ack the patch or take it) would work though.
>>
>> Arnd
>
>
> Yeah indeed. Ian?
>
For what it's worth, feel free to add my:
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-05 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-03 22:15 [PATCH 0/6] kill .ioctl file_operation Arnd Bergmann
2010-07-03 22:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-07-03 22:15 ` [PATCH 1/6] ia64/perfmon: convert to unlocked_ioctl Arnd Bergmann
2010-07-03 22:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-07-21 23:16 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-07-21 23:16 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-07-03 22:15 ` [PATCH 2/6] sound/oss: " Arnd Bergmann
2010-07-04 11:08 ` Sam Ravnborg
2010-07-04 11:08 ` Sam Ravnborg
2010-07-04 20:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-07-03 22:15 ` [PATCH 3/6] autofs/autofs4: move compat_ioctl handling into fs Arnd Bergmann
2010-07-05 19:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-07-05 19:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-05 19:48 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-07-05 19:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-07-05 19:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-07-05 20:12 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2010-07-05 20:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-06 1:11 ` Ian Kent
2010-07-06 11:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-07-06 13:17 ` Ian Kent
2010-07-16 0:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-07-16 4:40 ` Ian Kent
2010-07-16 11:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-07-16 12:09 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-07-03 22:15 ` [PATCH 4/6] cris: Pushdown the bkl from ioctl Arnd Bergmann
2010-07-30 17:08 ` Jesper Nilsson
2010-07-03 22:15 ` [PATCH 5/6] v4l: convert v4l2-dev to unlocked_ioctl Arnd Bergmann
2010-07-05 19:27 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-07-03 22:15 ` [PATCH 6/6] bkl: remove locked .ioctl file operation Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C323CAD.1070602@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=autofs@linux.kernel.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raven@themaw.net \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.