From: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: 'Kukjin Kim' <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
ben-linux@fluff.org, kyungmin.park@samsung.com,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: S5P: Support gpio interrupts
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:40:17 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C32DDE1.8070906@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000101cb1427$e88bfec0$b9a3fc40$%szyprowski@samsung.com>
On 6/25/2010 2:33 PM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wednesday, June 23, 2010 9:51 AM Kukjin Kim wrote:
>
>> Joonyoung Shim wrote:
>>> This patch v2 set is to support gpio interrupts of samsung s5p cpus, and
>>> the GPIOlib gpio_to_irq goes to plat-samsung gpiolib, so patch v2 set
>>> has four commit smaller than v1.
>>>
>>> Changes since v1:
>>> - Add irq_base to s3c_gpio_chip struct
>>> - GPIOlib gpio_to_irq() is implemented to samsung_gpiolib_to_irq() of
>>> plat-samsung gpiolib
>>>
>>> Joonyoung Shim (4):
>>> ARM: S5PV210: Add gpio interrupt support
>>> ARM: S5PC100: Use S5P gpio interrupts interface
>>> ARM: S5PC100: Move external interrupt defines
>>> ARM: SAMSUNG: Add GPIOlib gpio_to_irq
>>>
>>> arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/Makefile | 2 +-
>>> arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/gpiolib.c | 70 ++-----
>>> arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/include/mach/gpio.h | 7 -
>>> arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/include/mach/irqs.h | 18 ++-
>>> arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/include/mach/regs-gpio.h | 7 +
>>> arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/irq-gpio.c | 266
>> ------------------------
>>> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/gpiolib.c | 18 ++-
>>> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/irqs.h | 16 ++-
>>> arch/arm/plat-s5p/Makefile | 2 +-
>>> arch/arm/plat-s5p/irq-gpioint.c | 208 ++++++++++++++++++
>>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/gpiolib.c | 9 +
>>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/gpio-core.h | 6 +
>>> 12 files changed, 295 insertions(+), 334 deletions(-)
>>> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/irq-gpio.c
>>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-s5p/irq-gpioint.c
>>>
>> I am sure this patchset is working code, but Ben had made suggestion about
>> 'sparse irq'...
>> It is because there are too many gpio interrupts and having support of all
>> of them is unnecessary as realistically only few of them maybe used.
>
> Right. Ben suggested to create a pool for gpio interrupts (for example 16
> interrupts) and selectively assign them in machine startup code to those
> gpio pins that really need it.
>
> The problem is that such solution is not yet ready and we really need the
> gpio interrupt functionality for our boards (Aquila and GONI).
>
> Maybe these current patches could be merged now, and then, once the new
> solution is prepared, the gpio interrupt support get converted to selective
> registering?
>
I agree with Marek.
Ben and Kukjin, how do you think about this?
> S5PC100 already has gpio interrupt support.
>
>> In fact in SMDK board there is no use of gpio in interrupt mode.
>
> We are talking about support for Samsung S5PV210/S5PC110 SoCs in the Linux
> mainline kernel, not the support for only SMDK boards. GPIO interrupts is
> a feature of the SoC not a particular board.
>
> Best regards
> --
> Marek Szyprowski
> Samsung Poland R&D Center
>
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jy0922.shim@samsung.com (Joonyoung Shim)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: S5P: Support gpio interrupts
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:40:17 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C32DDE1.8070906@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000101cb1427$e88bfec0$b9a3fc40$%szyprowski@samsung.com>
On 6/25/2010 2:33 PM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wednesday, June 23, 2010 9:51 AM Kukjin Kim wrote:
>
>> Joonyoung Shim wrote:
>>> This patch v2 set is to support gpio interrupts of samsung s5p cpus, and
>>> the GPIOlib gpio_to_irq goes to plat-samsung gpiolib, so patch v2 set
>>> has four commit smaller than v1.
>>>
>>> Changes since v1:
>>> - Add irq_base to s3c_gpio_chip struct
>>> - GPIOlib gpio_to_irq() is implemented to samsung_gpiolib_to_irq() of
>>> plat-samsung gpiolib
>>>
>>> Joonyoung Shim (4):
>>> ARM: S5PV210: Add gpio interrupt support
>>> ARM: S5PC100: Use S5P gpio interrupts interface
>>> ARM: S5PC100: Move external interrupt defines
>>> ARM: SAMSUNG: Add GPIOlib gpio_to_irq
>>>
>>> arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/Makefile | 2 +-
>>> arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/gpiolib.c | 70 ++-----
>>> arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/include/mach/gpio.h | 7 -
>>> arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/include/mach/irqs.h | 18 ++-
>>> arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/include/mach/regs-gpio.h | 7 +
>>> arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/irq-gpio.c | 266
>> ------------------------
>>> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/gpiolib.c | 18 ++-
>>> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/irqs.h | 16 ++-
>>> arch/arm/plat-s5p/Makefile | 2 +-
>>> arch/arm/plat-s5p/irq-gpioint.c | 208 ++++++++++++++++++
>>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/gpiolib.c | 9 +
>>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/gpio-core.h | 6 +
>>> 12 files changed, 295 insertions(+), 334 deletions(-)
>>> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/irq-gpio.c
>>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-s5p/irq-gpioint.c
>>>
>> I am sure this patchset is working code, but Ben had made suggestion about
>> 'sparse irq'...
>> It is because there are too many gpio interrupts and having support of all
>> of them is unnecessary as realistically only few of them maybe used.
>
> Right. Ben suggested to create a pool for gpio interrupts (for example 16
> interrupts) and selectively assign them in machine startup code to those
> gpio pins that really need it.
>
> The problem is that such solution is not yet ready and we really need the
> gpio interrupt functionality for our boards (Aquila and GONI).
>
> Maybe these current patches could be merged now, and then, once the new
> solution is prepared, the gpio interrupt support get converted to selective
> registering?
>
I agree with Marek.
Ben and Kukjin, how do you think about this?
> S5PC100 already has gpio interrupt support.
>
>> In fact in SMDK board there is no use of gpio in interrupt mode.
>
> We are talking about support for Samsung S5PV210/S5PC110 SoCs in the Linux
> mainline kernel, not the support for only SMDK boards. GPIO interrupts is
> a feature of the SoC not a particular board.
>
> Best regards
> --
> Marek Szyprowski
> Samsung Poland R&D Center
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-06 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-11 8:33 [PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: S5P: Support gpio interrupts Joonyoung Shim
2010-06-11 8:33 ` Joonyoung Shim
2010-06-23 7:50 ` Kukjin Kim
2010-06-23 7:50 ` Kukjin Kim
2010-06-23 13:36 ` Kyungmin Park
2010-06-23 13:36 ` Kyungmin Park
2010-06-25 5:33 ` Marek Szyprowski
2010-06-25 5:33 ` Marek Szyprowski
2010-07-06 7:40 ` Joonyoung Shim [this message]
2010-07-06 7:40 ` Joonyoung Shim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C32DDE1.8070906@samsung.com \
--to=jy0922.shim@samsung.com \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.