All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
  2010-07-08 23:33 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-08 23:41   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Justin P. Mattock

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
Subject		: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
Submitter	: Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-07-03 22:59 (6 days old)
Message-ID	: <4C2FC0E3.6050101-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
@ 2010-07-08 23:41   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Justin P. Mattock

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
Subject		: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
Submitter	: Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com>
Date		: 2010-07-03 22:59 (6 days old)
Message-ID	: <4C2FC0E3.6050101@gmail.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug 16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
       [not found] ` <201007082338.o68NcT0C019156@demeter.kernel.org>
@ 2010-07-09  0:18   ` Andrew Morton
  2010-07-09  0:53     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2010-07-09  0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rik van Riel, KOSAKI Motohiro, Nick Piggin
  Cc: linux-mm, bugzilla-daemon, justinmattock


(switched to email.  Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).

On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 23:38:29 GMT bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:

> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337

[10384.818511] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP 
: [10384.818517] last sysfs file: /sys/devices/platform/applesmc.768/light
: [10384.818520] CPU 1 
: [10384.818522] Modules linked in: radeon ttm drm_kms_helper drm sco xcbc bnep rmd160 sha512_generic xt_tcpudp ipt_LOG iptable_nat nf_nat xt_state nf_conntrack_ftp nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv4 iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables ath9k ath9k_common firewire_ohci firewire_core battery ath9k_hw ac video evdev ohci1394 sky2 ath joydev button thermal i2c_i801 hid_magicmouse aes_x86_64 lzo lzo_compress zlib ipcomp xfrm_ipcomp crypto_null sha256_generic cbc des_generic cast5 blowfish serpent camellia twofish twofish_common ctr ah4 esp4 authenc raw1394 ieee1394 uhci_hcd ehci_hcd hci_uart rfcomm btusb hidp l2cap bluetooth coretemp acpi_cpufreq processor mperf appletouch applesmc uvcvideo
: [10384.818594] 
: [10384.818598] Pid: 409, comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 2.6.35-rc3-00398-g5a847c7-dirty #13 Mac-F42187C8/MacBookPro2,2
: [10384.818601] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810b7487>]  [<ffffffff810b7487>] find_get_pages+0x62/0xc0
: [10384.818611] RSP: 0018:ffff88003e011b40  EFLAGS: 00010293
: [10384.818614] RAX: ffff88000008f000 RBX: ffff88003e011bf0 RCX: 0000000000000003
: [10384.818617] RDX: ffff88003e011c08 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 8ed88ec88ce88b66
: [10384.818620] RBP: ffff88003e011b90 R08: 8ed88ec88ce88b6e R09: 0000000000000002
: [10384.818623] R10: ffff88000008f050 R11: ffff88000008f050 R12: ffffffffffffffff
: [10384.818626] R13: 000000000000000e R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000003
: [10384.818629] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff880001b00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
: [10384.818632] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
: [10384.818635] CR2: 00007f1a8989b000 CR3: 000000000166d000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
: [10384.818638] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
: [10384.818641] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
: [10384.818644] Process kswapd0 (pid: 409, threadinfo ffff88003e010000, task ffff88003eded490)
: [10384.818646] Stack:
: [10384.818648]  ffff88003e011b70 ffffffff810c0e85 ffff880018a2afe0 0000000e0001fad8
: [10384.818652] <0> ffff880018a30c68 ffff88003e011be0 0000000000000000 ffff88003e011be0
: [10384.818657] <0> ffffffffffffffff ffff880018a2afd8 ffff88003e011bb0 ffffffff810bed06
: [10384.818663] Call Trace:
: [10384.818669]  [<ffffffff810c0e85>] ? __remove_mapping+0xa5/0xbe
: [10384.818674]  [<ffffffff810bed06>] pagevec_lookup+0x1d/0x26
: [10384.818678]  [<ffffffff810bfb78>] invalidate_mapping_pages+0xe7/0x10b
: [10384.818683]  [<ffffffff810fdc4a>] shrink_icache_memory+0x10a/0x227
: [10384.818687]  [<ffffffff810c21fc>] shrink_slab+0xd6/0x147
: [10384.818691]  [<ffffffff810c25d2>] balance_pgdat+0x365/0x5b4
: [10384.818695]  [<ffffffff810c29c7>] kswapd+0x1a6/0x1bc
: [10384.818700]  [<ffffffff81070d75>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x34
: [10384.818704]  [<ffffffff810c2821>] ? kswapd+0x0/0x1bc
: [10384.818707]  [<ffffffff81070953>] kthread+0x7a/0x82
: [10384.818712]  [<ffffffff81027264>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
: [10384.818716]  [<ffffffff810708d9>] ? kthread+0x0/0x82
: [10384.818719]  [<ffffffff81027260>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10
: [10384.818721] Code: f5 d0 11 00 48 89 da 89 45 cc 31 c9 eb 64 48 8b 02 48 8b 38 40 f6 c7 01 49 0f 45 fc 48 85 ff 74 4b 48 83 ff ff 74 c8 4c 8d 47 08 <8b> 77 08 85 f6 74 dc 44 8d 4e 01 89 f0 f0 45 0f b1 08 39 f0 74 
: [10384.818762] RIP  [<ffffffff810b7487>] find_get_pages+0x62/0xc0
: [10384.818767]  RSP <ffff88003e011b40>
: [10384.818770] ---[ end trace 594fde37483e4533 ]---
: 

Gad.  Did we do anything recently which could have caused that?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug 16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
  2010-07-09  0:18   ` [Bug 16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP Andrew Morton
@ 2010-07-09  0:53     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
  2010-07-09  1:04       ` Justin P. Mattock
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: KOSAKI Motohiro @ 2010-07-09  0:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton
  Cc: kosaki.motohiro, Rik van Riel, Nick Piggin, linux-mm,
	bugzilla-daemon, justinmattock

> 
> (switched to email.  Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
> bugzilla web interface).
> 
> On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 23:38:29 GMT bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> 
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
> 
> [10384.818511] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP 
> : [10384.818517] last sysfs file: /sys/devices/platform/applesmc.768/light
> : [10384.818520] CPU 1 
> : [10384.818522] Modules linked in: radeon ttm drm_kms_helper drm sco xcbc bnep rmd160 sha512_generic xt_tcpudp ipt_LOG iptable_nat nf_nat xt_state nf_conntrack_ftp nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv4 iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables ath9k ath9k_common firewire_ohci firewire_core battery ath9k_hw ac video evdev ohci1394 sky2 ath joydev button thermal i2c_i801 hid_magicmouse aes_x86_64 lzo lzo_compress zlib ipcomp xfrm_ipcomp crypto_null sha256_generic cbc des_generic cast5 blowfish serpent camellia twofish twofish_common ctr ah4 esp4 authenc raw1394 ieee1394 uhci_hcd ehci_hcd hci_uart rfcomm btusb hidp l2cap bluetooth coretemp acpi_cpufreq processor mperf appletouch applesmc uvcvideo
> : [10384.818594] 
> : [10384.818598] Pid: 409, comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 2.6.35-rc3-00398-g5a847c7-dirty #13 Mac-F42187C8/MacBookPro2,2
> : [10384.818601] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810b7487>]  [<ffffffff810b7487>] find_get_pages+0x62/0xc0
> : [10384.818611] RSP: 0018:ffff88003e011b40  EFLAGS: 00010293
> : [10384.818614] RAX: ffff88000008f000 RBX: ffff88003e011bf0 RCX: 0000000000000003
> : [10384.818617] RDX: ffff88003e011c08 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 8ed88ec88ce88b66
> : [10384.818620] RBP: ffff88003e011b90 R08: 8ed88ec88ce88b6e R09: 0000000000000002
> : [10384.818623] R10: ffff88000008f050 R11: ffff88000008f050 R12: ffffffffffffffff
> : [10384.818626] R13: 000000000000000e R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000003
> : [10384.818629] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff880001b00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> : [10384.818632] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
> : [10384.818635] CR2: 00007f1a8989b000 CR3: 000000000166d000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
> : [10384.818638] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> : [10384.818641] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> : [10384.818644] Process kswapd0 (pid: 409, threadinfo ffff88003e010000, task ffff88003eded490)
> : [10384.818646] Stack:
> : [10384.818648]  ffff88003e011b70 ffffffff810c0e85 ffff880018a2afe0 0000000e0001fad8
> : [10384.818652] <0> ffff880018a30c68 ffff88003e011be0 0000000000000000 ffff88003e011be0
> : [10384.818657] <0> ffffffffffffffff ffff880018a2afd8 ffff88003e011bb0 ffffffff810bed06
> : [10384.818663] Call Trace:
> : [10384.818669]  [<ffffffff810c0e85>] ? __remove_mapping+0xa5/0xbe
> : [10384.818674]  [<ffffffff810bed06>] pagevec_lookup+0x1d/0x26
> : [10384.818678]  [<ffffffff810bfb78>] invalidate_mapping_pages+0xe7/0x10b
> : [10384.818683]  [<ffffffff810fdc4a>] shrink_icache_memory+0x10a/0x227
> : [10384.818687]  [<ffffffff810c21fc>] shrink_slab+0xd6/0x147
> : [10384.818691]  [<ffffffff810c25d2>] balance_pgdat+0x365/0x5b4
> : [10384.818695]  [<ffffffff810c29c7>] kswapd+0x1a6/0x1bc
> : [10384.818700]  [<ffffffff81070d75>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x34
> : [10384.818704]  [<ffffffff810c2821>] ? kswapd+0x0/0x1bc
> : [10384.818707]  [<ffffffff81070953>] kthread+0x7a/0x82
> : [10384.818712]  [<ffffffff81027264>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> : [10384.818716]  [<ffffffff810708d9>] ? kthread+0x0/0x82
> : [10384.818719]  [<ffffffff81027260>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10
> : [10384.818721] Code: f5 d0 11 00 48 89 da 89 45 cc 31 c9 eb 64 48 8b 02 48 8b 38 40 f6 c7 01 49 0f 45 fc 48 85 ff 74 4b 48 83 ff ff 74 c8 4c 8d 47 08 <8b> 77 08 85 f6 74 dc 44 8d 4e 01 89 f0 f0 45 0f b1 08 39 f0 74 
> : [10384.818762] RIP  [<ffffffff810b7487>] find_get_pages+0x62/0xc0
> : [10384.818767]  RSP <ffff88003e011b40>
> : [10384.818770] ---[ end trace 594fde37483e4533 ]---
> : 
> 
> Gad.  Did we do anything recently which could have caused that?

I can't find doubious commit in this area ;-)



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug 16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
  2010-07-09  0:53     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
@ 2010-07-09  1:04       ` Justin P. Mattock
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Justin P. Mattock @ 2010-07-09  1:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: KOSAKI Motohiro
  Cc: Andrew Morton, Rik van Riel, Nick Piggin, linux-mm,
	bugzilla-daemon

On 07/08/2010 05:53 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>>
>> (switched to email.  Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
>> bugzilla web interface).
>>
>> On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 23:38:29 GMT bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
>>
>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
>>
>> [10384.818511] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
>> : [10384.818517] last sysfs file: /sys/devices/platform/applesmc.768/light
>> : [10384.818520] CPU 1
>> : [10384.818522] Modules linked in: radeon ttm drm_kms_helper drm sco xcbc bnep rmd160 sha512_generic xt_tcpudp ipt_LOG iptable_nat nf_nat xt_state nf_conntrack_ftp nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv4 iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables ath9k ath9k_common firewire_ohci firewire_core battery ath9k_hw ac video evdev ohci1394 sky2 ath joydev button thermal i2c_i801 hid_magicmouse aes_x86_64 lzo lzo_compress zlib ipcomp xfrm_ipcomp crypto_null sha256_generic cbc des_generic cast5 blowfish serpent camellia twofish twofish_common ctr ah4 esp4 authenc raw1394 ieee1394 uhci_hcd ehci_hcd hci_uart rfcomm btusb hidp l2cap bluetooth coretemp acpi_cpufreq processor mperf appletouch applesmc uvcvideo
>> : [10384.818594]
>> : [10384.818598] Pid: 409, comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 2.6.35-rc3-00398-g5a847c7-dirty #13 Mac-F42187C8/MacBookPro2,2
>> : [10384.818601] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810b7487>]  [<ffffffff810b7487>] find_get_pages+0x62/0xc0
>> : [10384.818611] RSP: 0018:ffff88003e011b40  EFLAGS: 00010293
>> : [10384.818614] RAX: ffff88000008f000 RBX: ffff88003e011bf0 RCX: 0000000000000003
>> : [10384.818617] RDX: ffff88003e011c08 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 8ed88ec88ce88b66
>> : [10384.818620] RBP: ffff88003e011b90 R08: 8ed88ec88ce88b6e R09: 0000000000000002
>> : [10384.818623] R10: ffff88000008f050 R11: ffff88000008f050 R12: ffffffffffffffff
>> : [10384.818626] R13: 000000000000000e R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000003
>> : [10384.818629] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff880001b00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>> : [10384.818632] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
>> : [10384.818635] CR2: 00007f1a8989b000 CR3: 000000000166d000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
>> : [10384.818638] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
>> : [10384.818641] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
>> : [10384.818644] Process kswapd0 (pid: 409, threadinfo ffff88003e010000, task ffff88003eded490)
>> : [10384.818646] Stack:
>> : [10384.818648]  ffff88003e011b70 ffffffff810c0e85 ffff880018a2afe0 0000000e0001fad8
>> : [10384.818652]<0>  ffff880018a30c68 ffff88003e011be0 0000000000000000 ffff88003e011be0
>> : [10384.818657]<0>  ffffffffffffffff ffff880018a2afd8 ffff88003e011bb0 ffffffff810bed06
>> : [10384.818663] Call Trace:
>> : [10384.818669]  [<ffffffff810c0e85>] ? __remove_mapping+0xa5/0xbe
>> : [10384.818674]  [<ffffffff810bed06>] pagevec_lookup+0x1d/0x26
>> : [10384.818678]  [<ffffffff810bfb78>] invalidate_mapping_pages+0xe7/0x10b
>> : [10384.818683]  [<ffffffff810fdc4a>] shrink_icache_memory+0x10a/0x227
>> : [10384.818687]  [<ffffffff810c21fc>] shrink_slab+0xd6/0x147
>> : [10384.818691]  [<ffffffff810c25d2>] balance_pgdat+0x365/0x5b4
>> : [10384.818695]  [<ffffffff810c29c7>] kswapd+0x1a6/0x1bc
>> : [10384.818700]  [<ffffffff81070d75>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x34
>> : [10384.818704]  [<ffffffff810c2821>] ? kswapd+0x0/0x1bc
>> : [10384.818707]  [<ffffffff81070953>] kthread+0x7a/0x82
>> : [10384.818712]  [<ffffffff81027264>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
>> : [10384.818716]  [<ffffffff810708d9>] ? kthread+0x0/0x82
>> : [10384.818719]  [<ffffffff81027260>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10
>> : [10384.818721] Code: f5 d0 11 00 48 89 da 89 45 cc 31 c9 eb 64 48 8b 02 48 8b 38 40 f6 c7 01 49 0f 45 fc 48 85 ff 74 4b 48 83 ff ff 74 c8 4c 8d 47 08<8b>  77 08 85 f6 74 dc 44 8d 4e 01 89 f0 f0 45 0f b1 08 39 f0 74
>> : [10384.818762] RIP  [<ffffffff810b7487>] find_get_pages+0x62/0xc0
>> : [10384.818767]  RSP<ffff88003e011b40>
>> : [10384.818770] ---[ end trace 594fde37483e4533 ]---
>> :
>>
>> Gad.  Did we do anything recently which could have caused that?
>
> I can't find doubious commit in this area ;-)
>
>
>
>


when this hit.. I had only reverted this commit 6a4f3b52. As for seeing 
this again nothing.. only this one time so far..(tried numerous times to 
reproduce so I can bisect, but nothing, just the one time).

Justin P. Mattock

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
  2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-07-23 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Justin P. Mattock,
	Pauli Nieminen

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
Subject		: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
Submitter	: Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com>
Date		: 2010-07-03 22:59 (21 days old)
Message-ID	: <4C2FC0E3.6050101@gmail.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
  2010-08-01 13:46 2.6.35-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-08-01 13:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-08-02  1:01     ` Justin P. Mattock
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-01 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Justin P. Mattock,
	Pauli Nieminen

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
Subject		: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
Submitter	: Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com>
Date		: 2010-07-03 22:59 (30 days old)
Message-ID	: <4C2FC0E3.6050101@gmail.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
  2010-08-01 13:52 ` [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-08-02  1:01     ` Justin P. Mattock
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Justin P. Mattock @ 2010-08-02  1:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	Pauli Nieminen

On 08/01/2010 06:52 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
> Subject		: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
> Submitter	: Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2010-07-03 22:59 (30 days old)
> Message-ID	:<4C2FC0E3.6050101-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

Ive played around with the machine that originally hit this. but still 
cant seem to reproduce or trigger this.

Justin P. Mattock

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
@ 2010-08-02  1:01     ` Justin P. Mattock
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Justin P. Mattock @ 2010-08-02  1:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	Pauli Nieminen

On 08/01/2010 06:52 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
> Subject		: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
> Submitter	: Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock@gmail.com>
> Date		: 2010-07-03 22:59 (30 days old)
> Message-ID	:<4C2FC0E3.6050101@gmail.com>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

Ive played around with the machine that originally hit this. but still 
cant seem to reproduce or trigger this.

Justin P. Mattock

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
  2010-08-02  1:01     ` Justin P. Mattock
@ 2010-08-02 13:34         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-02 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Justin P. Mattock
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	Pauli Nieminen

On Monday, August 02, 2010, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
> On 08/01/2010 06:52 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
> > Subject		: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
> > Submitter	: Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2010-07-03 22:59 (30 days old)
> > Message-ID	:<4C2FC0E3.6050101-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
> 
> Ive played around with the machine that originally hit this. but still 
> cant seem to reproduce or trigger this.

I'll close it, then.  Please reopen if you reproduce the issue.

Rafael

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
@ 2010-08-02 13:34         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-02 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Justin P. Mattock
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	Pauli Nieminen

On Monday, August 02, 2010, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
> On 08/01/2010 06:52 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
> > Subject		: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
> > Submitter	: Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock@gmail.com>
> > Date		: 2010-07-03 22:59 (30 days old)
> > Message-ID	:<4C2FC0E3.6050101@gmail.com>
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
> 
> Ive played around with the machine that originally hit this. but still 
> cant seem to reproduce or trigger this.

I'll close it, then.  Please reopen if you reproduce the issue.

Rafael

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
  2010-08-02 13:34         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  (?)
@ 2010-08-02 13:47         ` Justin P. Mattock
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Justin P. Mattock @ 2010-08-02 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	Pauli Nieminen

On 08/02/2010 06:34 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, August 02, 2010, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>> On 08/01/2010 06:52 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
>>> of recent regressions.
>>>
>>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>>> from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
>>> know (either way).
>>>
>>>
>>> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
>>> Subject		: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
>>> Submitter	: Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock@gmail.com>
>>> Date		: 2010-07-03 22:59 (30 days old)
>>> Message-ID	:<4C2FC0E3.6050101@gmail.com>
>>> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>>
>>
>> Ive played around with the machine that originally hit this. but still
>> cant seem to reproduce or trigger this.
>
> I'll close it, then.  Please reopen if you reproduce the issue.
>
> Rafael
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>


o.k. Ill keep my eye out for this.. and if im able to reproduce I'll 
bisect it re-open this bug etc...

Justin P. Mattock

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
  2010-08-29 22:57 2.6.36-rc3: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-08-29 23:13   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Justin P. Mattock,
	Pauli Nieminen

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
Subject		: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
Submitter	: Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-07-03 22:59 (58 days old)
Message-ID	: <<4C2FC0E3.6050101-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
@ 2010-08-29 23:13   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Justin P. Mattock,
	Pauli Nieminen

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
Subject		: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
Submitter	: Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com>
Date		: 2010-07-03 22:59 (58 days old)
Message-ID	: <<4C2FC0E3.6050101@gmail.com>>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
  2010-08-29 23:13   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-08-29 23:52     ` Justin P. Mattock
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Justin P. Mattock @ 2010-08-29 23:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	Pauli Nieminen

On 08/29/2010 04:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
> Subject		: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
> Submitter	: Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2010-07-03 22:59 (58 days old)
> Message-ID	:<<4C2FC0E3.6050101-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2
>
>
>


only have seen this once..on the other hand (If im correct)maciej or 
pauli where able to reproduce this.. I say leave open then go from there.

Justin P. Mattock

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
@ 2010-08-29 23:52     ` Justin P. Mattock
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Justin P. Mattock @ 2010-08-29 23:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	Pauli Nieminen

On 08/29/2010 04:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
> Subject		: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
> Submitter	: Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock@gmail.com>
> Date		: 2010-07-03 22:59 (58 days old)
> Message-ID	:<<4C2FC0E3.6050101@gmail.com>>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2
>
>
>


only have seen this once..on the other hand (If im correct)maciej or 
pauli where able to reproduce this.. I say leave open then go from there.

Justin P. Mattock

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
  2010-08-29 23:52     ` Justin P. Mattock
@ 2010-08-30  7:38         ` Pauli Nieminen
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Pauli Nieminen @ 2010-08-30  7:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Justin P. Mattock
  Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
	Maciej Rutecki

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:52 AM, Justin P. Mattock
<justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On 08/29/2010 04:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should
>> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>>
>>
>> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
>> Subject         : general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
>> Submitter       : Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>> Date            : 2010-07-03 22:59 (58 days old)
>> Message-ID      :<<4C2FC0E3.6050101-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>>
>> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> only have seen this once..on the other hand (If im correct)maciej or pauli
> where able to reproduce this.. I say leave open then go from there.
>
> Justin P. Mattock
>

I was able to reproduce this with about 50% chance in boot. But that
happened in a few rc (rc2-rc4 iirc) versions only. After that never
again.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
@ 2010-08-30  7:38         ` Pauli Nieminen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Pauli Nieminen @ 2010-08-30  7:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Justin P. Mattock
  Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
	Maciej Rutecki

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:52 AM, Justin P. Mattock
<justinmattock@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 08/29/2010 04:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should
>> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>>
>>
>> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
>> Subject         : general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
>> Submitter       : Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock@gmail.com>
>> Date            : 2010-07-03 22:59 (58 days old)
>> Message-ID      :<<4C2FC0E3.6050101@gmail.com>>
>> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> only have seen this once..on the other hand (If im correct)maciej or pauli
> where able to reproduce this.. I say leave open then go from there.
>
> Justin P. Mattock
>

I was able to reproduce this with about 50% chance in boot. But that
happened in a few rc (rc2-rc4 iirc) versions only. After that never
again.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
  2010-08-30  7:38         ` Pauli Nieminen
@ 2010-08-30 17:26             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-30 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pauli Nieminen
  Cc: Justin P. Mattock, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
	Maciej Rutecki

On Monday, August 30, 2010, Pauli Nieminen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:52 AM, Justin P. Mattock
> <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > On 08/29/2010 04:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>
> >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> >> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >>
> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should
> >> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >>
> >>
> >> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
> >> Subject         : general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
> >> Submitter       : Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> >> Date            : 2010-07-03 22:59 (58 days old)
> >> Message-ID      :<<4C2FC0E3.6050101-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>>
> >> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > only have seen this once..on the other hand (If im correct)maciej or pauli
> > where able to reproduce this.. I say leave open then go from there.
> >
> > Justin P. Mattock
> >
> 
> I was able to reproduce this with about 50% chance in boot. But that
> happened in a few rc (rc2-rc4 iirc) versions only. After that never
> again.

OK, I'm closing it now, please reopen if you see it again.

Rafael

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
@ 2010-08-30 17:26             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-30 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pauli Nieminen
  Cc: Justin P. Mattock, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
	Maciej Rutecki

On Monday, August 30, 2010, Pauli Nieminen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:52 AM, Justin P. Mattock
> <justinmattock@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 08/29/2010 04:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>
> >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> >> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >>
> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should
> >> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >>
> >>
> >> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
> >> Subject         : general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
> >> Submitter       : Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock@gmail.com>
> >> Date            : 2010-07-03 22:59 (58 days old)
> >> Message-ID      :<<4C2FC0E3.6050101@gmail.com>>
> >> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > only have seen this once..on the other hand (If im correct)maciej or pauli
> > where able to reproduce this.. I say leave open then go from there.
> >
> > Justin P. Mattock
> >
> 
> I was able to reproduce this with about 50% chance in boot. But that
> happened in a few rc (rc2-rc4 iirc) versions only. After that never
> again.

OK, I'm closing it now, please reopen if you see it again.

Rafael

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-30 17:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-16337-27@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
     [not found] ` <201007082338.o68NcT0C019156@demeter.kernel.org>
2010-07-09  0:18   ` [Bug 16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP Andrew Morton
2010-07-09  0:53     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-09  1:04       ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-08-29 22:57 2.6.36-rc3: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-29 23:13 ` [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-29 23:13   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-29 23:52   ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-08-29 23:52     ` Justin P. Mattock
     [not found]     ` <4C7AF2C4.9040507-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2010-08-30  7:38       ` Pauli Nieminen
2010-08-30  7:38         ` Pauli Nieminen
     [not found]         ` <AANLkTinzVmtWhhvuRNcKF1xKs+L=Lw0DT2osDxcbA6ze-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-08-30 17:26           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-30 17:26             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-08-01 13:46 2.6.35-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-01 13:52 ` [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-02  1:01   ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-08-02  1:01     ` Justin P. Mattock
     [not found]     ` <4C5618DA.1020407-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2010-08-02 13:34       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-02 13:34         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-02 13:47         ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-08 23:33 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-08 23:41   ` Rafael J. Wysocki

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.