All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] Question about ath9k signal strength (AP mode)
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 03:47:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C39229D.9050701@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100711013717.18416.qmail@stuge.se>

On 2010-07-11 3:37 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Lars Hardy wrote:
>> I have tried with 2 different Atheros chipset in AP mode, the AR5416
>> and AR9280. dd-wrt gives a stronger signal with both chipsets
>> compared with openwrt.
>> 
>> I know the ath9k is under development, so my question is if this is
>> known by the development team and therefor will be worked on?
> 
> I continue to have problems with ath9k and development is slower than
> I first expected since Atheros seems to have very limited focus on
> support, and only for the very latest generation hardware. (I wish
> they made this fact more clear.) Community resources are of course
> also limited, but great improvements have been made to ath9k by
> members of the OpenWRT community and I guess they will continue their
> work.
> 
> Without looking much at the code, but following this list for half a
> year, my gut feeling is that there is still too much major work
> required on ath9k at this point for "fine tuning" such as signal
> strength optimization to come up on the agenda in the near future..
I disagree. The major work has been done and hardware support has mostly
caught up with Atheros' own codebase. What's missing is debugging work
and fine tuning - and other than that, maybe a few things that aren't
very hardware specific.

- Felix

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-11  1:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-10 16:12 [ath9k-devel] Question about ath9k signal strength (AP mode) Lars Hardy
2010-07-11  1:37 ` Peter Stuge
2010-07-11  1:47   ` Felix Fietkau [this message]
2010-07-11  9:12     ` RHS Linux User
2010-07-11 10:36 ` Benoit Papillault
2010-07-11 11:45   ` Lars Hardy
2010-07-15 17:00     ` [ath9k-devel] ath9k in Android Jónatan Muñoz
     [not found]     ` <-7894757102193377304@unknownmsgid>
2010-07-15 17:54       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-07-21  9:55         ` Jónatan Muñoz
     [not found]         ` <8721124828604730134@unknownmsgid>
2010-07-21 16:32           ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-07-21 16:55             ` Jónatan Muñoz
     [not found]             ` <-6449101635941367687@unknownmsgid>
2010-07-21 19:18               ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-07-11 11:51   ` [ath9k-devel] Question about ath9k signal strength (AP mode) Peter Stuge
2010-07-11 17:18     ` Benoit Papillault

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C39229D.9050701@openwrt.org \
    --to=nbd@openwrt.org \
    --cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.