From: Lars Hardy <lars.hardy@gmail.com>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] Question about ath9k signal strength (AP mode)
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 13:45:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C39AEDD.8010803@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C399EB4.5080508@free.fr>
Benoit Papillault skrev:
> Le 10/07/2010 18:12, Lars Hardy a ?crit :
>> It seems that there is a difference in signal strength between the ath9k
>> (latest openwrt-trunk with compat-wireless 08.07.2010) driver and the
>> latest dd-wrt (madwifi N?) driver.
>> The dd-wrt driver has better signal strength and performance when a STA
>> is some distance from the AP. (like 1 floor/2 rooms between)
>> I have tried with 2 different Atheros chipset in AP mode, the AR5416 and
>> AR9280. dd-wrt gives a stronger signal with both chipsets compared with
>> openwrt.
>>
>> I know the ath9k is under development, so my question is if this is
>> known by the development team and therefor will be worked on?
>>
>> Lars
>
> [ignoring other not very informative post...]
>
> Did you measure the signal strength on the STA side? What tool did you
> use? iw / iwconfig ?
>
This was from the client side, with an AR5416 MAC/BB Rev:2 AR5133 in
HT40 - as AP.
Tested a bit further and It seems that the signal is only weaker when
ath9k use the 5 Ghz band. (pretty much the same as dd-wrt in 2.4 Ghz)
iw reported: Router with dd-wrt: signal: -72.00 dBm Router with
OpenWrt: signal: -80.00 dBm
(from this distance the STA could not connect when using OpenWrt but
connected when dd-wrt was on the router)
STA is an AR5418 AR5133 card, using the same/latest compat-wireless as
OpenWrt.
> Is there a way you can bisect between OpenWrt and dd-wrt? I have
> AR5416, AR9160 and AR9280 myself, so I can test if you tell me what
> version you used.
>
I'm sorry but I have no idea how to do that. I only used the latest
dd-wrt binary:
ftp://ftp.dd-wrt.com/others/eko/BrainSlayer-V24-preSP2/06-30-10-r14684/
> Regards,
> Benoit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-11 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-10 16:12 [ath9k-devel] Question about ath9k signal strength (AP mode) Lars Hardy
2010-07-11 1:37 ` Peter Stuge
2010-07-11 1:47 ` Felix Fietkau
2010-07-11 9:12 ` RHS Linux User
2010-07-11 10:36 ` Benoit Papillault
2010-07-11 11:45 ` Lars Hardy [this message]
2010-07-15 17:00 ` [ath9k-devel] ath9k in Android Jónatan Muñoz
[not found] ` <-7894757102193377304@unknownmsgid>
2010-07-15 17:54 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-07-21 9:55 ` Jónatan Muñoz
[not found] ` <8721124828604730134@unknownmsgid>
2010-07-21 16:32 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-07-21 16:55 ` Jónatan Muñoz
[not found] ` <-6449101635941367687@unknownmsgid>
2010-07-21 19:18 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-07-11 11:51 ` [ath9k-devel] Question about ath9k signal strength (AP mode) Peter Stuge
2010-07-11 17:18 ` Benoit Papillault
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C39AEDD.8010803@gmail.com \
--to=lars.hardy@gmail.com \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.