* [refpolicy] Bug in corenetwork.
@ 2010-07-14 12:47 Daniel J Walsh
2010-07-19 18:23 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Daniel J Walsh @ 2010-07-14 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: refpolicy
We went back and reread the bindreservport code in glibc.
Turns out the range or ports that this will reserve are 512-1024 rather
then 600-1024.
The code actually first tries to reserve a port from 600-1024 and if
they are ALL reserved will try 512-599.
So we need to change corenetwork to reflect this.
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: corenetwork.patch
Url: http://oss.tresys.com/pipermail/refpolicy/attachments/20100714/dcb7a106/attachment.pl
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [refpolicy] Bug in corenetwork.
2010-07-14 12:47 [refpolicy] Bug in corenetwork Daniel J Walsh
@ 2010-07-19 18:23 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Christopher J. PeBenito @ 2010-07-19 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: refpolicy
On 07/14/10 08:47, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> We went back and reread the bindreservport code in glibc.
>
> Turns out the range or ports that this will reserve are 512-1024 rather
> then 600-1024.
>
> The code actually first tries to reserve a port from 600-1024 and if
> they are ALL reserved will try 512-599.
>
> So we need to change corenetwork to reflect this.
Merged.
--
Chris PeBenito
Tresys Technology, LLC
www.tresys.com | oss.tresys.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-07-19 18:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-07-14 12:47 [refpolicy] Bug in corenetwork Daniel J Walsh
2010-07-19 18:23 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.