All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] KVM: MMU: fix forgot reserved bits check in speculative path
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 21:24:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C3DBA97.40908@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C3DB671.1090802@redhat.com>



Avi Kivity wrote:

>> +
>> +            if (!!is_pae(vcpu) != sp->role.cr4_pae ||
>> +                  is_nx(vcpu) != sp->role.nxe)
>> +                continue;
>> +
>>    
> 
> Do we also need to check cr0.wp?  I think so.

I think it's not too bad since we just decrease the access right, for example,
we mark the mapping readonly for cr0.wp=0's page, the later write-access will
cause #PF, and the read-access is OK.

> 
>>               if (gentry)
>>                   mmu_pte_write_new_pte(vcpu, sp, spte,&gentry);
>>    
> 
> Please move the checks to mmu_pte_write_new_pte(), it's a more logical
> place.
> 
> It means the reserved bits check happens multiple times, but that's ok.
> 

OK

> Also, you can use arch.mmu.base_role to compare:
> 
>     static const kvm_mmu_page_role mask = { .level = -1U, .cr4_pae = 1,
> ... };
> 
>     if ((sp->role.word ^ base_role.word) & mask.word)
>          return;

OK, will update it :-)

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-14 13:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-13  9:42 [PATCH 1/4] KVM: MMU: fix forgot reserved bits check in speculative path Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-13  9:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: MMU: cleanup spte update path Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-13  9:45 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: MMU: track dirty page in speculative path properly Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-13 22:05   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-14  1:24     ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-14 11:09       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-14 13:18         ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-14 14:06           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-14 14:25             ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-15  7:44             ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-15 16:40               ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-16  1:58                 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-14  5:53   ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-13  9:46 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: MMU: remove valueless output message Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-13 21:28 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: MMU: fix forgot reserved bits check in speculative path Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-14  1:08   ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-14 13:06 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-14 13:24   ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2010-07-14 14:27     ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C3DBA97.40908@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.