From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [S+Q2 00/19] SLUB with queueing (V2) beats SLAB netperf TCP_RR
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:23:25 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C4016FD.9080207@cs.helsinki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1007141650110.29110@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
David Rientjes wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jul 2010, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>
>> The following patchset cleans some pieces up and then equips SLUB with
>> per cpu queues that work similar to SLABs queues.
>
> Pekka, I think patches 4-8 could be applied to your tree now, they're
> relatively unchanged from what's been posted before. (I didn't ack patch
> 9 because I think it makes slab_lock() -> slab_unlock() matching more
> difficult with little win, but I don't feel strongly about it.)
Yup, I applied 4-8. Thanks guys!
> I'd also consider patch 7 for 2.6.35-rc6 (and -stable).
It's an obvious bug fix but is it triggered in practice? Is there a
bugzilla report for that?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [S+Q2 00/19] SLUB with queueing (V2) beats SLAB netperf TCP_RR
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:23:25 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C4016FD.9080207@cs.helsinki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1007141650110.29110@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
David Rientjes wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jul 2010, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>
>> The following patchset cleans some pieces up and then equips SLUB with
>> per cpu queues that work similar to SLABs queues.
>
> Pekka, I think patches 4-8 could be applied to your tree now, they're
> relatively unchanged from what's been posted before. (I didn't ack patch
> 9 because I think it makes slab_lock() -> slab_unlock() matching more
> difficult with little win, but I don't feel strongly about it.)
Yup, I applied 4-8. Thanks guys!
> I'd also consider patch 7 for 2.6.35-rc6 (and -stable).
It's an obvious bug fix but is it triggered in practice? Is there a
bugzilla report for that?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-16 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-09 19:07 [S+Q2 00/19] SLUB with queueing (V2) beats SLAB netperf TCP_RR Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 01/19] Bugfix for semop() not reporting successful operation Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 02/19] percpu: make @dyn_size always mean min dyn_size in first chunk init functions Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 03/19] percpu: allow limited allocation before slab is online Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 04/19] slub: Use a constant for a unspecified node Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 05/19] SLUB: Constants need UL Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 06/19] slub: Check kasprintf results in kmem_cache_init() Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-14 22:16 ` David Rientjes
2010-07-14 22:16 ` David Rientjes
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 07/19] slub: Allow removal of slab caches during boot Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-14 23:48 ` David Rientjes
2010-07-14 23:48 ` David Rientjes
2010-07-19 0:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-19 0:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-19 16:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-19 16:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-31 9:41 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-07-31 9:41 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-02 15:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-02 15:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-03 4:32 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-03 4:32 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 08/19] slub: Use kmem_cache flags to detect if slab is in debugging mode Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 09/19] slub: discard_slab_unlock Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 10/19] slub: remove dynamic dma slab allocation Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 11/19] slub: Remove static kmem_cache_cpu array for boot Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 12/19] slub: Dynamically size kmalloc cache allocations Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 13/19] slub: Extract hooks for memory checkers from hotpaths Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 14/19] slub: Move gfpflag masking out of the hotpath Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 15/19] SLUB: Add SLAB style per cpu queueing Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 16/19] slub: Resize the new cpu queues Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 17/19] SLUB: Get rid of useless function count_free() Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 18/19] SLUB: Remove MAX_OBJS limitation Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 19/19] slub: Drop allocator announcement Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-10 19:56 ` [S+Q2 00/19] SLUB with queueing (V2) beats SLAB netperf TCP_RR Heinz Diehl
2010-07-10 19:56 ` Heinz Diehl
2010-07-12 15:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-12 16:39 ` Heinz Diehl
2010-07-12 17:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-12 17:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-13 13:56 ` Heinz Diehl
2010-07-14 2:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-14 2:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-14 11:51 ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-14 11:51 ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-14 14:25 ` Heinz Diehl
2010-07-14 14:25 ` Heinz Diehl
2010-07-14 20:22 ` David Rientjes
2010-07-14 20:22 ` David Rientjes
2010-07-14 11:46 ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-14 11:46 ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-14 22:26 ` David Rientjes
2010-07-14 22:26 ` David Rientjes
2010-07-15 20:17 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-15 20:17 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-15 20:30 ` David Rientjes
2010-07-15 20:30 ` David Rientjes
2010-07-14 23:52 ` David Rientjes
2010-07-14 23:52 ` David Rientjes
2010-07-16 8:23 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2010-07-16 8:23 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-07-16 9:02 ` David Rientjes
2010-07-16 9:02 ` David Rientjes
2010-07-19 0:16 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-19 0:16 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C4016FD.9080207@cs.helsinki.fi \
--to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.