From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Wang Sheng-Hui <crosslonelyover@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 RESEND] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:49:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C45D3B0.7030202@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C447CE9.20904@redhat.com>
Eric Sandeen wrote:
...
> Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Actually retract that, as Andreas pointed out:
>> fs/mbcache.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/mbcache.c b/fs/mbcache.c
>> index ec88ff3..5697d9e 100644
>> --- a/fs/mbcache.c
>> +++ b/fs/mbcache.c
>> @@ -201,21 +201,13 @@ mb_cache_shrink_fn(int nr_to_scan, gfp_t gfp_mask)
>> {
>> LIST_HEAD(free_list);
>> struct list_head *l, *ltmp;
>> + struct mb_cache *cache;
>> int count = 0;
>>
>> - spin_lock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
you've lost this spin_lock ...
>> - list_for_each(l, &mb_cache_list) {
>> - struct mb_cache *cache >> - list_entry(l, struct mb_cache, c_cache_list);
>> - mb_debug("cache %s (%d)", cache->c_name,
>> - atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count));
>> - count += atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count);
>> - }
>> mb_debug("trying to free %d entries", nr_to_scan);
>> - if (nr_to_scan = 0) {
>> - spin_unlock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
>> + if (nr_to_scan = 0)
>> goto out;
>> - }
>> +
and here you're iterating over it while unlocked....
>> while (nr_to_scan-- && !list_empty(&mb_cache_lru_list)) {
>> struct mb_cache_entry *ce >> list_entry(mb_cache_lru_list.next,
struct mb_cache_entry, e_lru_list);
list_move_tail(&ce->e_lru_list, &free_list);
__mb_cache_entry_unhash(ce);
}
spin_unlock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
.... and here you unlock an unlocked spinlock.
Sorry I missed that.
-Eric
>> @@ -229,6 +221,14 @@ mb_cache_shrink_fn(int nr_to_scan, gfp_t gfp_mask)
>> e_lru_list), gfp_mask);
>> }
>> out:
>> + spin_lock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
>> + list_for_each_entry(cache, &mb_cache_list, c_cache_list) {
>> + mb_debug("cache %s (%d)", cache->c_name,
>> + atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count));
>> + count += atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count);
>> + }
>> + spin_unlock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
>> +
>> return (count / 100) * sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure;
>> }
>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Wang Sheng-Hui <crosslonelyover@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 RESEND] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:49:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C45D3B0.7030202@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C447CE9.20904@redhat.com>
Eric Sandeen wrote:
...
> Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Actually retract that, as Andreas pointed out:
>> fs/mbcache.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/mbcache.c b/fs/mbcache.c
>> index ec88ff3..5697d9e 100644
>> --- a/fs/mbcache.c
>> +++ b/fs/mbcache.c
>> @@ -201,21 +201,13 @@ mb_cache_shrink_fn(int nr_to_scan, gfp_t gfp_mask)
>> {
>> LIST_HEAD(free_list);
>> struct list_head *l, *ltmp;
>> + struct mb_cache *cache;
>> int count = 0;
>>
>> - spin_lock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
you've lost this spin_lock ...
>> - list_for_each(l, &mb_cache_list) {
>> - struct mb_cache *cache =
>> - list_entry(l, struct mb_cache, c_cache_list);
>> - mb_debug("cache %s (%d)", cache->c_name,
>> - atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count));
>> - count += atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count);
>> - }
>> mb_debug("trying to free %d entries", nr_to_scan);
>> - if (nr_to_scan == 0) {
>> - spin_unlock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
>> + if (nr_to_scan == 0)
>> goto out;
>> - }
>> +
and here you're iterating over it while unlocked....
>> while (nr_to_scan-- && !list_empty(&mb_cache_lru_list)) {
>> struct mb_cache_entry *ce =
>> list_entry(mb_cache_lru_list.next,
struct mb_cache_entry, e_lru_list);
list_move_tail(&ce->e_lru_list, &free_list);
__mb_cache_entry_unhash(ce);
}
spin_unlock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
.... and here you unlock an unlocked spinlock.
Sorry I missed that.
-Eric
>> @@ -229,6 +221,14 @@ mb_cache_shrink_fn(int nr_to_scan, gfp_t gfp_mask)
>> e_lru_list), gfp_mask);
>> }
>> out:
>> + spin_lock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
>> + list_for_each_entry(cache, &mb_cache_list, c_cache_list) {
>> + mb_debug("cache %s (%d)", cache->c_name,
>> + atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count));
>> + count += atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count);
>> + }
>> + spin_unlock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
>> +
>> return (count / 100) * sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure;
>> }
>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Wang Sheng-Hui <crosslonelyover@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 RESEND] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:49:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C45D3B0.7030202@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C447CE9.20904@redhat.com>
Eric Sandeen wrote:
...
> Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Actually retract that, as Andreas pointed out:
>> fs/mbcache.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/mbcache.c b/fs/mbcache.c
>> index ec88ff3..5697d9e 100644
>> --- a/fs/mbcache.c
>> +++ b/fs/mbcache.c
>> @@ -201,21 +201,13 @@ mb_cache_shrink_fn(int nr_to_scan, gfp_t gfp_mask)
>> {
>> LIST_HEAD(free_list);
>> struct list_head *l, *ltmp;
>> + struct mb_cache *cache;
>> int count = 0;
>>
>> - spin_lock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
you've lost this spin_lock ...
>> - list_for_each(l, &mb_cache_list) {
>> - struct mb_cache *cache =
>> - list_entry(l, struct mb_cache, c_cache_list);
>> - mb_debug("cache %s (%d)", cache->c_name,
>> - atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count));
>> - count += atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count);
>> - }
>> mb_debug("trying to free %d entries", nr_to_scan);
>> - if (nr_to_scan == 0) {
>> - spin_unlock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
>> + if (nr_to_scan == 0)
>> goto out;
>> - }
>> +
and here you're iterating over it while unlocked....
>> while (nr_to_scan-- && !list_empty(&mb_cache_lru_list)) {
>> struct mb_cache_entry *ce =
>> list_entry(mb_cache_lru_list.next,
struct mb_cache_entry, e_lru_list);
list_move_tail(&ce->e_lru_list, &free_list);
__mb_cache_entry_unhash(ce);
}
spin_unlock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
.... and here you unlock an unlocked spinlock.
Sorry I missed that.
-Eric
>> @@ -229,6 +221,14 @@ mb_cache_shrink_fn(int nr_to_scan, gfp_t gfp_mask)
>> e_lru_list), gfp_mask);
>> }
>> out:
>> + spin_lock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
>> + list_for_each_entry(cache, &mb_cache_list, c_cache_list) {
>> + mb_debug("cache %s (%d)", cache->c_name,
>> + atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count));
>> + count += atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count);
>> + }
>> + spin_unlock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
>> +
>> return (count / 100) * sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure;
>> }
>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-20 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-18 13:57 [PATCH 1/2 RESEND] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan Wang Sheng-Hui
2010-07-18 13:57 ` [PATCH 1/2 RESEND] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0 Wang Sheng-Hui
2010-07-18 13:57 ` Wang Sheng-Hui
2010-07-18 13:58 ` [PATCH 1/2 RESEND] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when shenghui
2010-07-18 13:58 ` [PATCH 1/2 RESEND] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0 shenghui
2010-07-18 13:58 ` shenghui
2010-07-19 16:27 ` [PATCH 1/2 RESEND] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when Eric Sandeen
2010-07-19 16:27 ` [PATCH 1/2 RESEND] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0 Eric Sandeen
2010-07-19 16:27 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-07-20 16:49 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2010-07-20 16:49 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-07-20 16:49 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C45D3B0.7030202@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=crosslonelyover@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.