All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-next-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	David Howells <dhowells-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Steve French <smfrench-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the workqueues tree with the Linus' tree
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:45:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C4980CC.7070909@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100723214233.7cb7de8d.sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org>

Hello,

On 07/23/2010 01:42 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:34:55 +0200 Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>
>> I was thinking about sending pull request w/ a note describing how to
>> resolve the conflict.  Would pulling in master before requesting pull
>> be better?
> 
> Either would work.  Linus is fine with doing merge fixups and, after all,
> I figured it out. :-)
> 
> A description always helps, of course.

Yeah, sorry about causng headaches in linux-next.  I'll test merge w/
mainline and let you know non-trivial conflicts for future commits.

Thank you.

-- 
tejun

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>,
	linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the workqueues tree with the Linus' tree
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:45:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C4980CC.7070909@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100723214233.7cb7de8d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

Hello,

On 07/23/2010 01:42 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:34:55 +0200 Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> I was thinking about sending pull request w/ a note describing how to
>> resolve the conflict.  Would pulling in master before requesting pull
>> be better?
> 
> Either would work.  Linus is fine with doing merge fixups and, after all,
> I figured it out. :-)
> 
> A description always helps, of course.

Yeah, sorry about causng headaches in linux-next.  I'll test merge w/
mainline and let you know non-trivial conflicts for future commits.

Thank you.

-- 
tejun

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-07-23 11:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-23  4:46 linux-next: manual merge of the workqueues tree with the Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2010-07-23  4:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
     [not found] ` <20100723144600.dd4da992.sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org>
2010-07-23 11:28   ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-23 11:28     ` Tejun Heo
     [not found]     ` <4C497CD5.5010908-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2010-07-23 11:31       ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-07-23 11:31         ` Stephen Rothwell
     [not found]         ` <20100723213148.3d2193a3.sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org>
2010-07-23 11:34           ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-23 11:34             ` Tejun Heo
     [not found]             ` <4C497E5F.80301-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2010-07-23 11:42               ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-07-23 11:42                 ` Stephen Rothwell
     [not found]                 ` <20100723214233.7cb7de8d.sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org>
2010-07-23 11:45                   ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-07-23 11:45                     ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-05  3:04                   ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-05  3:04                     ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-05  3:45                     ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-07-23 12:05   ` David Howells
2010-07-23 12:05     ` David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C4980CC.7070909@kernel.org \
    --to=tj-dgejt+ai2ygdnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dhowells-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-next-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=smfrench-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.