Re: [PATCH 00/27] KVM PPC PV framework v3

[Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>]

  On 07/29/2010 03:47 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On PPC we run PR=0 (kernel mode) code in PR=1 (user mode) and don't use the
> hypervisor extensions.
>
> While that is all great to show that virtualization is possible, there are
> quite some cases where the emulation overhead of privileged instructions is
> killing performance.
>
> This patchset tackles exactly that issue. It introduces a paravirtual framework
> using which KVM and Linux share a page to exchange register state with. That
> way we don't have to switch to the hypervisor just to change a value of a
> privileged register.
>
> To prove my point, I ran the same test I did for the MMU optimizations against
> the PV framework. Here are the results:
>
> [without]
>
> debian-powerpc:~# time for i in {1..1000}; do /bin/echo hello>  /dev/null; done
>
> real    0m14.659s
> user    0m8.967s
> sys     0m5.688s
>
> [with]
>
> debian-powerpc:~# time for i in {1..1000}; do /bin/echo hello>  /dev/null; done
>
> real    0m7.557s
> user    0m4.121s
> sys     0m3.426s
>
>
> So this is a significant performance improvement! I'm quite happy how fast this
> whole thing becomes :)
>
> I tried to take all comments I've heard from people so far about such a PV
> framework into account. In case you told me something before that is a no-go
> and I still did it, please just tell me again.
>
> To make use of this whole thing you also need patches to qemu and openbios. I
> have them in my queue, but want to see this set upstream first before I start
> sending patches to the other projects.
>
> Now go and have fun with fast VMs on PPC! Get yourself a G5 on ebay and start
> experiencing the power yourself. - heh
>

Applied this and your follow on 7-part series, thanks.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function