All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3 v2] mm: Fix writeback_in_progress()
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 21:37:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C5B1301.9080307@fusionio.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1281034399-13055-3-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>

On 08/05/2010 08:53 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> Commit 83ba7b071f30f7c01f72518ad72d5cd203c27502 broke writeback_in_progress()
> as in that commit we started to remove work items from the list at the
> moment we start working on them and not at the moment they are finished.
> Thus if the flusher thread was doing some work but there was no other
> work queued, writeback_in_progress() returned false. This could in
> particular cause unnecessary queueing of background writeback from
> balance_dirty_pages() or writeout work from writeback_sb_if_idle().
> 
> This patch fixes the problem by introducing a bit in the bdi state which
> indicates that the flusher thread is processing some work and uses this
> bit for writeback_in_progress() test.
> 
> NOTE: Both callsites of writeback_in_progress() (namely,
> writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle() and balance_dirty_pages()) would actually
> need a different information than what writeback_in_progress() provides.
> They would need to know whether *the kind of writeback they are going
> to submit* is already queued. But this information isn't that simple
> to provide so let's fix writeback_in_progress() for the time being.

I left this deliberatly vague, as there's no good way to answer the
question that the caller wants to know about.

Alternatively, augment the list_empty() check with a task running
check. I guess that would require the wb lock, so your bit set/check
is the best solution I think.

Acked-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>

-- 
Jens Axboe


Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, its contents and any attachments to it are confidential to the intended recipient, and may contain information that is privileged and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify the sender and destroy the original e-mail message and any attachments (and any copies that may have been made) from your system or otherwise. Any unauthorized use, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information is strictly prohibited.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-05 19:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-05 18:53 [PATCH 0/3 v2] Three writeback fixes to stop sync(1) livelocks Jan Kara
2010-08-05 18:53 ` [PATCH 1/3 v2] mm: Stop background writeback if there is other work queued for the thread Jan Kara
2010-08-05 19:38   ` Jens Axboe
2010-08-05 23:45   ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-07 16:04     ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-08  2:43     ` Jan Kara
2010-08-08  3:10       ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-08  4:12     ` Dave Chinner
2010-08-08  7:29       ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-08 11:07         ` Jens Axboe
2010-08-08 13:59           ` Jan Kara
2010-08-08 22:55             ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-05 18:53 ` [PATCH 2/3 v2] mm: Fix writeback_in_progress() Jan Kara
2010-08-05 19:37   ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2010-08-05 23:06   ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-06  0:10   ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-08  2:25     ` Jan Kara
2010-08-05 18:53 ` [PATCH 3/3 v2] mm: Avoid resetting wb_start after each writeback round Jan Kara
2010-08-05 19:38   ` Jens Axboe
2010-08-06  0:21   ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-07 22:45     ` Jan Kara
2010-08-06 12:23 ` [PATCH 0/3 v2] Three writeback fixes to stop sync(1) livelocks Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C5B1301.9080307@fusionio.com \
    --to=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.