All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bian Naimeng <biannm@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] We should clear NFS_DELEGATED_STATE after return delegation
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 12:10:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C5B8B48.4050008@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1281013423.2948.1.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>



Trond Myklebust 写道:
> On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 10:26 +0800, Bian Naimeng wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 17:18 +0800, Bian Naimeng wrote:
>>>> We should clear NFS_DELEGATED_STATE bit for inode->open_states after return delegation.
>>>>

    ... snip ...

>>  Thanks Trond.
>>  But why we must remove test_and_clear_bit behind memcmp?
>>
>>  Always test_bit and memcmp have same result, and I think test_and_clear_bit is fast 
>>  than memcmp, so i suggest we should call test_and_clear_bit first. right?
> 
> We can't clear the bit before the memcmp() test. What we could do is
> keep the current test_bit() and then do a clear_bit after the memcmp().
> 

  When i apply the patch, my test still fail. 

   The ctx->state will set set after open success, but this ctx add to the
  the nfsi->open_files when we call nfs_open that is so early. So maybe
  there are some states can be found at nfsi->open_states, but not at
  ctx->state of nfsi->open_files, so we will miss clear NFS_DELEGATED_STATE
  for these state.

Regards
 Bian Naimeng

--------------------------------------------------

NFSv4: Remember to clear NFS_DELEGATED_STATE in nfs_delegation_claim_opens

Signed-off-by: Bian Naimeng <biannm@cn.fujitsu.com>

---
 fs/nfs/delegation.c |   15 +++++++++++----
 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/delegation.c b/fs/nfs/delegation.c
index 3016345..94a63e3 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/delegation.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/delegation.c
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static int nfs_delegation_claim_opens(struct inode *inode, const nfs4_stateid *s
 	struct nfs_inode *nfsi = NFS_I(inode);
 	struct nfs_open_context *ctx;
 	struct nfs4_state *state;
-	int err;
+	int err = 0;
 
 again:
 	spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
@@ -112,12 +112,19 @@ again:
 		if (err >= 0)
 			err = nfs_delegation_claim_locks(ctx, state);
 		put_nfs_open_context(ctx);
-		if (err != 0)
-			return err;
+		if (err != 0) {
+			spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
+			break;
+		}
 		goto again;
 	}
+
+	list_for_each_entry(state, &nfsi->open_states, inode_states) {
+		clear_bit(NFS_DELEGATED_STATE, &state->flags);
+	}
+
 	spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
-	return 0;
+	return err;
 }
 
 /*
-- 
1.6.5.2



-- 
Regards
Bian Naimeng


  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-06  4:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-04  9:14 [PATCH 0/2] Fix bug that client use a invaild delegation Bian Naimeng
2010-08-04  9:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] Make lock inode before lock nfs4_state_owner Bian Naimeng
2010-08-04  9:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] We should clear NFS_DELEGATED_STATE after return delegation Bian Naimeng
2010-08-04 12:45   ` Trond Myklebust
2010-08-05  2:26     ` Bian Naimeng
2010-08-05 13:03       ` Trond Myklebust
2010-08-06  4:10         ` Bian Naimeng [this message]
2010-08-06 13:30           ` Trond Myklebust
2010-08-16  7:50             ` Bian Naimeng
2010-08-17 23:16               ` Trond Myklebust
2010-08-18  3:17                 ` Bian Naimeng
2010-08-23  7:43                   ` Bian Naimeng
2010-09-01  6:40                 ` Bian Naimeng
2010-09-07 22:04                   ` Trond Myklebust
2010-09-08  1:33                     ` Bian Naimeng
2010-09-08  1:57                       ` Trond Myklebust
2010-09-08  2:37                         ` Bian Naimeng
2010-09-08  3:11                         ` Bian Naimeng
2010-09-08 20:37                           ` Trond Myklebust
2010-09-09  1:29                             ` Bian Naimeng
2010-11-24  6:27                               ` Bian Naimeng
     [not found]                             ` <1283978245.2905.23.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2010-12-02  8:32                               ` Li Yewang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C5B8B48.4050008@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=biannm@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.