From: Bian Naimeng <biannm@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] We should clear NFS_DELEGATED_STATE after return delegation
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:50:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C68EDAE.5000201@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1281101448.3586.11.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
>>>>>> We should clear NFS_DELEGATED_STATE bit for inode->open_states after return delegation.
... snip ...
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(state, &nfsi->open_states, inode_states) {
>> + clear_bit(NFS_DELEGATED_STATE, &state->flags);
>> + }
>> +
>> spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
>> - return 0;
>> + return err;
>> }
>>
>
> I still don't see why this should be necessary. In the case of a server
> reboot or network partition, the state recovery thread ought to be
> taking care of this for us.
>
A open state can be found at nfsi->open_states and owner->so_states always, but
it not be found at nfsi->open_files until we call nfs4_intent_set_file.
At _nfs4_do_open, we will invoke nfs4_return_incompatible_delegation to return a
delegation, a open stateid which set NFS_DELEGATED_STATE bit may not be found at
nfsi->open_files, but it still at nfsi->open_states, so we do not clear
NFS_DELEGATED_STATE bit for it.
Then _nfs4_do_open will find it by nfs4_get_open_state, and we still use it
as a delegation, some error will occur.
--
Regards
Bian Naimeng
> Cheers
> Trond
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-16 7:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-04 9:14 [PATCH 0/2] Fix bug that client use a invaild delegation Bian Naimeng
2010-08-04 9:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] Make lock inode before lock nfs4_state_owner Bian Naimeng
2010-08-04 9:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] We should clear NFS_DELEGATED_STATE after return delegation Bian Naimeng
2010-08-04 12:45 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-08-05 2:26 ` Bian Naimeng
2010-08-05 13:03 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-08-06 4:10 ` Bian Naimeng
2010-08-06 13:30 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-08-16 7:50 ` Bian Naimeng [this message]
2010-08-17 23:16 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-08-18 3:17 ` Bian Naimeng
2010-08-23 7:43 ` Bian Naimeng
2010-09-01 6:40 ` Bian Naimeng
2010-09-07 22:04 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-09-08 1:33 ` Bian Naimeng
2010-09-08 1:57 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-09-08 2:37 ` Bian Naimeng
2010-09-08 3:11 ` Bian Naimeng
2010-09-08 20:37 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-09-09 1:29 ` Bian Naimeng
2010-11-24 6:27 ` Bian Naimeng
[not found] ` <1283978245.2905.23.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2010-12-02 8:32 ` Li Yewang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C68EDAE.5000201@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=biannm@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.