All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PATCH 3/6 - direct-io: do not merge logically non-contiguous requests
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2010 09:31:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C5D0BC2.1040706@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100806120358.GA31601@infradead.org>



On 08/06/2010 02:03 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Something is deeply wrong here.  Raw block device access has a 1:1
> mapping between logical and physical block numbers.  They really shou=
ld
> never be non-contiguous.

At least I did nothing I know about to break it :-)

As I mentioned just iozone using direct I/O (-I flag of iozone then=20
using O_DIRECT for the file) on a ext2 file-system.
The file system was coming clean out of mkfs the file was written with=20
iozone one step before the traced read run.

The only uncommon thing here might be the block device, which is a scsi=
=20
disk on our SAN servers (I'm running on s390) - so the driver in charge=
=20
is zfcp (drivers/s390/scsi/).
I could use dasd (drivers/s390/block) disks as well, but I have no=20
blktrace of them yet - what I already know is that they show a similar=20
cost increase. On monday I should be able to get machine resources to=20
verify that both disk types are affected.

Let me know if I can do anything else on my system to shed some light o=
n=20
the matter.



--=20

Gr=FCsse / regards, Christian Ehrhardt
IBM Linux Technology Center, System z Linux Performance
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel=
" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PATCH 3/6 - direct-io: do not merge logically non-contiguous requests
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2010 09:31:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C5D0BC2.1040706@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100806120358.GA31601@infradead.org>



On 08/06/2010 02:03 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Something is deeply wrong here.  Raw block device access has a 1:1
> mapping between logical and physical block numbers.  They really should
> never be non-contiguous.

At least I did nothing I know about to break it :-)

As I mentioned just iozone using direct I/O (-I flag of iozone then 
using O_DIRECT for the file) on a ext2 file-system.
The file system was coming clean out of mkfs the file was written with 
iozone one step before the traced read run.

The only uncommon thing here might be the block device, which is a scsi 
disk on our SAN servers (I'm running on s390) - so the driver in charge 
is zfcp (drivers/s390/scsi/).
I could use dasd (drivers/s390/block) disks as well, but I have no 
blktrace of them yet - what I already know is that they show a similar 
cost increase. On monday I should be able to get machine resources to 
verify that both disk types are affected.

Let me know if I can do anything else on my system to shed some light on 
the matter.



-- 

Grüsse / regards, Christian Ehrhardt
IBM Linux Technology Center, System z Linux Performance

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PATCH 3/6 - direct-io: do not merge logically non-contiguous requests
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2010 09:31:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C5D0BC2.1040706@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100806120358.GA31601@infradead.org>



On 08/06/2010 02:03 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Something is deeply wrong here.  Raw block device access has a 1:1
> mapping between logical and physical block numbers.  They really should
> never be non-contiguous.

At least I did nothing I know about to break it :-)

As I mentioned just iozone using direct I/O (-I flag of iozone then 
using O_DIRECT for the file) on a ext2 file-system.
The file system was coming clean out of mkfs the file was written with 
iozone one step before the traced read run.

The only uncommon thing here might be the block device, which is a scsi 
disk on our SAN servers (I'm running on s390) - so the driver in charge 
is zfcp (drivers/s390/scsi/).
I could use dasd (drivers/s390/block) disks as well, but I have no 
blktrace of them yet - what I already know is that they show a similar 
cost increase. On monday I should be able to get machine resources to 
verify that both disk types are affected.

Let me know if I can do anything else on my system to shed some light on 
the matter.



-- 

Grüsse / regards, Christian Ehrhardt
IBM Linux Technology Center, System z Linux Performance
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-07  7:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-06 10:50 PATCH 3/6 - direct-io: do not merge logically non-contiguous requests Christian Ehrhardt
2010-08-06 12:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-07  7:31   ` Christian Ehrhardt [this message]
2010-08-07  7:31     ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-08-07  7:31     ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-08-10 18:40     ` Jeff Moyer
2010-08-11  1:55       ` Josef Bacik
2010-08-11 13:27         ` Jeff Moyer
2010-08-11 14:08           ` Josef Bacik
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-08-06 10:50 Christian Ehrhardt
2010-08-06 10:50 Christian Ehrhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C5D0BC2.1040706@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=josef@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.