Re: Fallback to scanning OF tree if no devaliases

["Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko" <phcoder@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1408 bytes --]

On 08/09/2010 05:41 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 04:48:04PM +0200, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>   
>> As I already told on IRC such a behaviour isn't of a good design. A
>> simple example is when one add a devalias and then all other disks
>> disappear. Moreover in experimental branch I have a solution for such a
>> problem: we scan all the devices and then show only the simpliest form.
>> That code just needs some testing. Could you do that? I'm sorry for not
>> having been available for last few days and this resulted in a mountain
>> of useless work by Doug and Lennart. I assume that the rest of this
>> thread is a discussion of this issue and is moot given the code which is
>> already in experimental. If it's not a case please start a new thread
>> per issue
>>     
> Where do I find that?  I would love to test it.
>
>   
BZR checkout from http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/r/grub/branches/experimental/
I'm especially interested in testing on multi-disk config (both my OFW
boxes have only one disk)
> I currently have the machine down because someone made a mistake that
> killed the box (or so they thought).  Nothing actually wrong with the
> box fortunately, but it means I can spend a few hours testing things
> before getting back to normal use again.
>
>   


-- 
Regards
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 294 bytes --]