All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Takao Indoh <indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	"nhorman@tuxdriver.com" <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	"kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"vgoyal@redhat.com" <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][EFI] Run EFI in physical mode
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:16:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C65D263.6050904@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1r5i2kt0n.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>

On 08/13/2010 04:11 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> 
> As to Peter's question I did not see any of that code that affected
> anything that ia64 used.
> 

I guess my real question was "is this something IA64 could benefit from
and/or could we make the IA64 code more similar to the x86 bits"?

	-hpa


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: "Luck\, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Takao Indoh <indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"vgoyal@redhat.com" <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	"nhorman@tuxdriver.com" <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][EFI] Run EFI in physical mode
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:16:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C65D263.6050904@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1r5i2kt0n.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>

On 08/13/2010 04:11 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> 
> As to Peter's question I did not see any of that code that affected
> anything that ia64 used.
> 

I guess my real question was "is this something IA64 could benefit from
and/or could we make the IA64 code more similar to the x86 bits"?

	-hpa


  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-13 23:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-13 19:18 [PATCH][EFI] Run EFI in physical mode Takao Indoh
2010-08-13 19:18 ` Takao Indoh
2010-08-13 22:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-13 22:19   ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-16 19:30   ` Takao Indoh
2010-08-16 19:30     ` Takao Indoh
2010-08-13 22:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-13 22:24   ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-13 22:33   ` Luck, Tony
2010-08-13 22:33     ` Luck, Tony
2010-08-13 23:11     ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-13 23:11       ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-13 23:16       ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2010-08-13 23:16         ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-13 23:36         ` Tony Luck
2010-08-13 23:36           ` Tony Luck
2010-08-16  1:31           ` Simon Horman
2010-08-16  1:31             ` Simon Horman
2010-08-13 22:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-13 22:28   ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-16  1:43 ` huang ying
2010-08-16  1:43   ` huang ying
2010-08-16  3:27   ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-16  3:27     ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-16  4:58     ` huang ying
2010-08-16  4:58       ` huang ying
2010-08-16  5:08       ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-16  5:08         ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-16 23:39         ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-16 23:39           ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-16 23:54           ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-16 23:54             ` H. Peter Anvin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-08-13 22:31 nhorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C65D263.6050904@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.