* [PATCH] base-files: Prefer ext4 > ext3 > ext2
@ 2010-08-18 22:58 Tom Rini
2010-08-19 5:56 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2010-08-18 22:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
Have /etc/filesystems try and mount ext4 then ext3 then ext2
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <tom_rini@mentor.com>
---
recipes/base-files/base-files/filesystems | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes/base-files/base-files/filesystems b/recipes/base-files/base-files/filesystems
index 653593a..10726c6 100644
--- a/recipes/base-files/base-files/filesystems
+++ b/recipes/base-files/base-files/filesystems
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
minix
fat
vfat
-ext2
+ext4
ext3
+ext2
*
--
1.6.3.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] base-files: Prefer ext4 > ext3 > ext2
2010-08-18 22:58 [PATCH] base-files: Prefer ext4 > ext3 > ext2 Tom Rini
@ 2010-08-19 5:56 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-08-19 15:19 ` Tom Rini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Frans Meulenbroeks @ 2010-08-19 5:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
2010/8/19 Tom Rini <tom_rini@mentor.com>:
> Have /etc/filesystems try and mount ext4 then ext3 then ext2
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <tom_rini@mentor.com>
> ---
> recipes/base-files/base-files/filesystems | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/recipes/base-files/base-files/filesystems b/recipes/base-files/base-files/filesystems
> index 653593a..10726c6 100644
> --- a/recipes/base-files/base-files/filesystems
> +++ b/recipes/base-files/base-files/filesystems
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> minix
> fat
> vfat
> -ext2
> +ext4
> ext3
> +ext2
> *
Is this the order in which they are tried?
If so I would suggest reordering them according to likelihood (e.g. minix last)
Frans
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] base-files: Prefer ext4 > ext3 > ext2
2010-08-19 5:56 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
@ 2010-08-19 15:19 ` Tom Rini
2010-08-19 19:12 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2010-08-19 15:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> 2010/8/19 Tom Rini <tom_rini@mentor.com>:
>> Have /etc/filesystems try and mount ext4 then ext3 then ext2
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <tom_rini@mentor.com>
>> ---
>> recipes/base-files/base-files/filesystems | 3 ++-
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/recipes/base-files/base-files/filesystems b/recipes/base-files/base-files/filesystems
>> index 653593a..10726c6 100644
>> --- a/recipes/base-files/base-files/filesystems
>> +++ b/recipes/base-files/base-files/filesystems
>> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>> minix
>> fat
>> vfat
>> -ext2
>> +ext4
>> ext3
>> +ext2
>> *
>
> Is this the order in which they are tried?
> If so I would suggest reordering them according to likelihood (e.g. minix last)
We could also do that, yes. For sanity, I'd have changing behavior of
ext[234] done on its own.
--
Tom Rini
Mentor Graphics Corporation
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] base-files: Prefer ext4 > ext3 > ext2
2010-08-19 15:19 ` Tom Rini
@ 2010-08-19 19:12 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Frans Meulenbroeks @ 2010-08-19 19:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
2010/8/19 Tom Rini <tom_rini@mentor.com>:
> Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
>>
>> 2010/8/19 Tom Rini <tom_rini@mentor.com>:
>>>
>>> Have /etc/filesystems try and mount ext4 then ext3 then ext2
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <tom_rini@mentor.com>
>>> ---
>>> recipes/base-files/base-files/filesystems | 3 ++-
>>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/recipes/base-files/base-files/filesystems
>>> b/recipes/base-files/base-files/filesystems
>>> index 653593a..10726c6 100644
>>> --- a/recipes/base-files/base-files/filesystems
>>> +++ b/recipes/base-files/base-files/filesystems
>>> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>>> minix
>>> fat
>>> vfat
>>> -ext2
>>> +ext4
>>> ext3
>>> +ext2
>>> *
>>
>> Is this the order in which they are tried?
>> If so I would suggest reordering them according to likelihood (e.g. minix
>> last)
>
> We could also do that, yes. For sanity, I'd have changing behavior of
> ext[234] done on its own.
Fine with me.
In that case for your patch:
Acked-by: Frans Meulenbroeks <fransmeulenbroeks@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-19 19:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-08-18 22:58 [PATCH] base-files: Prefer ext4 > ext3 > ext2 Tom Rini
2010-08-19 5:56 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-08-19 15:19 ` Tom Rini
2010-08-19 19:12 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.