* patch1/4: lvm manpages
@ 2010-08-19 23:58 Christoph Anton Mitterer
2010-08-20 13:09 ` Zdenek Kabelac
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Anton Mitterer @ 2010-08-19 23:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lvm-devel
Hi.
Attached would be several patches, that (IMHO) improve the lvm(8) manpage:
1) lvm.8.empty_LV.patch
It seems that the current "Where a list of VGs is required but is left empty, a
list of all VGs will be substituted." is also true for LVs (checked it with
lvdisplay, which seems to lists all LVs).
If this is true, add the patch, to reflect this in the documentation
Cheers,
Chris.
--- lvm.8 2010-06-23 16:25:44.099108000 +0200
+++ lvm.8 2010-06-23 16:28:42.675357517 +0200
@@ -24,8 +24,8 @@
.LP
Where commands take VG or LV names as arguments, the full path name is
optional. An LV called "lvol0" in a VG called "vg0" can be specified
-as "vg0/lvol0". Where a list of VGs is required but is left empty,
-a list of all VGs will be substituted. Where a list of LVs is required
+as "vg0/lvol0". Where a list of VGs or LVs is required but left empty,
+a list of all VGs or LVs will be substituted. Where a list of LVs is required
but a VG is given, a list of all the LVs in that VG will be substituted.
So "lvdisplay vg0" will display all the LVs in "vg0".
Tags can also be used - see \fBaddtag\fP below.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* patch1/4: lvm manpages
2010-08-19 23:58 patch1/4: lvm manpages Christoph Anton Mitterer
@ 2010-08-20 13:09 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2010-08-20 13:18 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Zdenek Kabelac @ 2010-08-20 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lvm-devel
Dne 20.8.2010 01:58, Christoph Anton Mitterer napsal(a):
> Hi.
>
> Attached would be several patches, that (IMHO) improve the lvm(8) manpage:
>
>
>
> 1) lvm.8.empty_LV.patch
> It seems that the current "Where a list of VGs is required but is left empty, a
> list of all VGs will be substituted." is also true for LVs (checked it with
> lvdisplay, which seems to lists all LVs).
> If this is true, add the patch, to reflect this in the documentation
>
lvdisplay - with empty list will substitutes with all VGs - thus effectively
display all LVs from all VGs - but it doesn't mean there is some substitution
for LVs. It's the effect of command that it displays all LVs from given VG.
Lots of commands scans for all LVs in given VGs (i.e. vgchange).
So this patch is rejected.
Zdenek
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* patch1/4: lvm manpages
2010-08-20 13:09 ` Zdenek Kabelac
@ 2010-08-20 13:18 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Anton Mitterer @ 2010-08-20 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lvm-devel
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:09:05 +0200, Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>
wrote:
> lvdisplay - with empty list will substitutes with all VGs - thus
> effectively
> display all LVs from all VGs - but it doesn't mean there is some
> substitution
> for LVs. It's the effect of command that it displays all LVs from given
VG.
> Lots of commands scans for all LVs in given VGs (i.e. vgchange).
Well... I still feel that there's something missing somewhere,...
nevertheless,... that's anyway just perfectionism =)
Cheers,
Chris.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-20 13:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-08-19 23:58 patch1/4: lvm manpages Christoph Anton Mitterer
2010-08-20 13:09 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2010-08-20 13:18 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.