From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"gleb@redhat.com" <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Disable GUEST_INTR_STATE_STI flag before injecting NMI to guest on VMX
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:58:50 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C77C49A.9000600@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C779C3D.2070700@siemens.com>
On 08/27/2010 02:06 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 08/27/2010 11:39 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> AMD does not differentiate between MOV-SS and STI interrupt shadows.
>>>
>>> But AMD has its own NMI problems as it does not allow to trap after
>>> IRET-from-NMI and requires magic dances which are partly broken in KVM.
>>> I'm leaning towards NMI window emulation via the workaround we use for
>>> older Intel CPUs without NMI window trapping as well.
>> Can you elaborate?
> Basically the issues you found regarding our single-step-based
> workaround.
I forgot them already. What was that, exception during IRET?
> Moreover, we cannot easily prevent that TF set by the NMI
> code leaks onto the guest's stack.
>
> Jörg and I stuck heads together about this during LinuxCon. We came to
> the conclusion that we either have to emulate the instruction that
> delays NMIs (ie. _every_ possible instruction for the interrupt shadow
> case) or fall back to the VMX workaround based on interrupt window
> trapping and an emergency timeout (much simpler, but not really correct).
I'd really like to avoid the timer. But I forgot all the details around
this, I'll have to re-learn them so I can actually compare the two options.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-27 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-26 20:06 [PATCH 0/1] Disable GUEST_INTR_STATE_STI flag before injecting NMI to VMX guest Jes.Sorensen
2010-08-26 20:06 ` [PATCH 1/1] Disable GUEST_INTR_STATE_STI flag before injecting NMI to guest on VMX Jes.Sorensen
2010-08-27 8:27 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-08-27 8:31 ` Jes Sorensen
2010-08-27 8:39 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-08-27 9:46 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-27 11:06 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-08-27 13:58 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-08-27 14:13 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-08-27 15:50 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-27 16:43 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-08-29 8:09 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-27 9:44 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-27 11:06 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-08-27 13:54 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-27 14:12 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-08-27 11:16 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-08-27 11:23 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-08-27 11:25 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-08-27 11:04 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-08-27 11:09 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-08-27 9:21 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-27 9:41 ` Jes Sorensen
2010-08-27 9:47 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-27 9:56 ` Jes Sorensen
2010-08-27 9:59 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-27 10:01 ` Jes Sorensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C77C49A.9000600@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.