All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, paulus@samba.org,
	davem@davemloft.net, fweisbec@gmail.com,
	perfmon2-devel@lists.sf.net, eranian@gmail.com,
	robert.richter@amd.com, acme@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] perf_events: add support for per-cpu per-cgroup monitoring (v3)
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:41:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C89EF37.5080803@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1284106566.402.26.camel@laptop>

Hello,

On 09/10/2010 10:16 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 23:41 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>>> alloc_percpu() is zalloc_percpu() in fact, memory is already cleared.
>>>
>> I remember thinking about this and trying to trace to the code down
>> to figure this out. But it is rather complicated. If alloc_percpu() always
>> clears the memory, then I think that calling is zalloc_percpu()
>> would be more helpful.... 

Maybe but at this point it might be a bit too late.  The allocator has
been that way since the beginning.

> pcpu_populate_chunk() in mm/percpu-vm.c does indeed do that memset, the
> one in mm/percpu-km.c does not.
> 
> It is not obviously clear to me the -km allocator does indeed result in
> zero filled memory.

Nice catch.  Fortunately, the -km allocator isn't currently being used
in upstrea although it was enabled for linux-next a couple of days
ago.  I'll fix it up.

Thank you.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-10  8:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-09 13:09 [RFC PATCH 1/2] perf_events: add support for per-cpu per-cgroup monitoring (v3) Stephane Eranian
2010-09-09 13:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-09 21:41   ` Stephane Eranian
2010-09-10  8:16     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-10  8:41       ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-09-10  8:52         ` [PATCH percpu#for-next] percpu: clear memory allocated with the km allocator Tejun Heo
2010-09-10  8:55           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-10 16:31             ` Randy Dunlap
2010-09-10 16:45               ` Ingo Molnar
2010-09-10 23:28                 ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-10  8:59         ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] perf_events: add support for per-cpu per-cgroup monitoring (v3) Stephane Eranian
2010-09-10  9:03           ` [PATCH] percpu: update comments to reflect that percpu allocations are always zero-filled Tejun Heo
2010-09-10  9:07             ` Stephane Eranian
2010-09-10  9:09             ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C89EF37.5080803@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eranian@gmail.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=perfmon2-devel@lists.sf.net \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.