From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org,
davem@davemloft.net, fweisbec@gmail.com,
perfmon2-devel@lists.sf.net, eranian@gmail.com,
robert.richter@amd.com, acme@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH percpu#for-next] percpu: clear memory allocated with the km allocator
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 01:28:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C8ABF15.8000108@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100910164525.GA11188@elte.hu>
On 09/10/2010 06:45 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:55:18 +0200 Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 10:52 +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>>> Percpu allocator should clear memory before returning it but the km
>>>> allocator forgot to do it. Fix it.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
>>>> Spotted-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>>>
>>> (fwiw, -tip uses Reported-by)
>>
>> fyi, Documentation/SubmittingPatches does also.
>
> Yeah, and, FYI, there's observed strong correlation between the
> maintenance policies of -tip and Documentation/SubmittingPatches.
> [i'd even venture so far to claim causation]
Oh, I already updated it to be Reported-by. I use Spotted-by when to
distinguish the cases where the root cause is diagnosed by the
reporter as opposed to when the reporter just reported a bug but I
suppose it's just causing more confusion. I'll just use Reproted-by
from now on.
Thank you.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-10 23:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-09 13:09 [RFC PATCH 1/2] perf_events: add support for per-cpu per-cgroup monitoring (v3) Stephane Eranian
2010-09-09 13:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-09 21:41 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-09-10 8:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-10 8:41 ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-10 8:52 ` [PATCH percpu#for-next] percpu: clear memory allocated with the km allocator Tejun Heo
2010-09-10 8:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-10 16:31 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-09-10 16:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-09-10 23:28 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-09-10 8:59 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] perf_events: add support for per-cpu per-cgroup monitoring (v3) Stephane Eranian
2010-09-10 9:03 ` [PATCH] percpu: update comments to reflect that percpu allocations are always zero-filled Tejun Heo
2010-09-10 9:07 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-09-10 9:09 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C8ABF15.8000108@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eranian@gmail.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=perfmon2-devel@lists.sf.net \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.