* Discussion topics for the coming Bake-A-Thon
@ 2010-09-18 0:33 Sorin Faibish
2010-09-19 14:12 ` Boaz Harrosh
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sorin Faibish @ 2010-09-18 0:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, nfsv4@ietf.org
All,
I am trying to build an agenda for discussions during the coming
Bake-A-Thon
at EMC October 4-8. I collected the last week several topics of interest
and
I want to ask you all to add any other topics of interest so I can close
the
agenda of the event. This is the list so far:
1. Layoutcommit for file layout (Dave Noveck)
2. Server side copy - (James)
3. Sparse files and storage preferences (Dean, Sorin)
4. Secure NFS (David Quigly)
5. Extend cthon tests with callback operations tests (Peter Honeyman)
6. Performance tests - tools and benchmarks (Peter Honeyman)
7. Utils and fedora rpm (Sorin, SteveD)
8. pNFS with IPv6 (Sorin)
9. Linux FedFS imlementation (Chuck)
I will allocate 30min for each topic and group them in 2 hours sessions
mostly in the early PM after lunch.
Please feel free to add any additional topics and thank you for your
patience.
/Sorin
--
Best Regards
Sorin Faibish
Corporate Distinguished Engineer
Unified Storage Division
EMC²
where information lives
Phone: 508-435-1000 x 48545
Cellphone: 617-510-0422
Email : sfaibish@emc.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: Discussion topics for the coming Bake-A-Thon 2010-09-18 0:33 Discussion topics for the coming Bake-A-Thon Sorin Faibish @ 2010-09-19 14:12 ` Boaz Harrosh 2010-09-19 14:49 ` [nfsv4] " Sorin Faibish 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Boaz Harrosh @ 2010-09-19 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sorin Faibish, Peter Honeyman; +Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, nfsv4@ietf.org On 09/18/2010 02:33 AM, Sorin Faibish wrote: > All, > > I am trying to build an agenda for discussions during the coming > Bake-A-Thon > at EMC October 4-8. I collected the last week several topics of interest > and > I want to ask you all to add any other topics of interest so I can close > the > agenda of the event. This is the list so far: > > 1. Layoutcommit for file layout (Dave Noveck) > 2. Server side copy - (James) > 3. Sparse files and storage preferences (Dean, Sorin) > 4. Secure NFS (David Quigly) > 5. Extend cthon tests with callback operations tests (Peter Honeyman) And local/remote truncate torture tests. > 6. Performance tests - tools and benchmarks (Peter Honeyman) to 6 or 5. Cluster tests. .i.e use of more then one client in concertration to confuse and crash a server. > 7. Utils and fedora rpm (Sorin, SteveD) > 8. pNFS with IPv6 (Sorin) > 9. Linux FedFS imlementation (Chuck) > > I will allocate 30min for each topic and group them in 2 hours sessions > mostly in the early PM after lunch. > > Please feel free to add any additional topics and thank you for your > patience. > > /Sorin > Thanks Boaz ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [nfsv4] Discussion topics for the coming Bake-A-Thon 2010-09-19 14:12 ` Boaz Harrosh @ 2010-09-19 14:49 ` Sorin Faibish 2010-09-19 14:59 ` Boaz Harrosh 2010-09-20 16:19 ` [nfsv4] " Thomas Haynes 0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Sorin Faibish @ 2010-09-19 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Boaz Harrosh, Peter Honeyman; +Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, nfsv4@ietf.org On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:12:32 -0400, Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> =20 wrote: > On 09/18/2010 02:33 AM, Sorin Faibish wrote: >> All, >> >> I am trying to build an agenda for discussions during the coming >> Bake-A-Thon >> at EMC October 4-8. I collected the last week several topics of interest >> and >> I want to ask you all to add any other topics of interest so I can close >> the >> agenda of the event. This is the list so far: >> >> 1. Layoutcommit for file layout (Dave Noveck) >> 2. Server side copy - (James) >> 3. Sparse files and storage preferences (Dean, Sorin) >> 4. Secure NFS (David Quigly) >> 5. Extend cthon tests with callback operations tests (Peter Honeyman) > > And local/remote truncate torture tests. Sure. Do we need a separate discussion or only this? > >> 6. Performance tests - tools and benchmarks (Peter Honeyman) > > to 6 or 5. Cluster tests. .i.e use of more then one client in =20 > concertration > to confuse and crash a server. This aside from cthon, just for performance qaulification for the git. Same do we need an additional spot or this is enough (30 min). I will update the agenda with your comments and I assume you will be part of the discussion, even drive it. /Sorin > >> 7. Utils and fedora rpm (Sorin, SteveD) >> 8. pNFS with IPv6 (Sorin) >> 9. Linux FedFS imlementation (Chuck) >> >> I will allocate 30min for each topic and group them in 2 hours sessions >> mostly in the early PM after lunch. >> >> Please feel free to add any additional topics and thank you for your >> patience. >> >> /Sorin >> > > > Thanks > Boaz > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > --=20 Best Regards Sorin Faibish Corporate Distinguished Engineer Unified Storage Division EMC=B2 where information lives Phone: 508-435-1000 x 48545 Cellphone: 617-510-0422 Email : sfaibish@emc.com _______________________________________________ nfsv4 mailing list nfsv4@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Discussion topics for the coming Bake-A-Thon 2010-09-19 14:49 ` [nfsv4] " Sorin Faibish @ 2010-09-19 14:59 ` Boaz Harrosh 2010-09-20 16:19 ` [nfsv4] " Thomas Haynes 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Boaz Harrosh @ 2010-09-19 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sorin Faibish; +Cc: Peter Honeyman, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, nfsv4@ietf.org On 09/19/2010 04:49 PM, Sorin Faibish wrote: > On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:12:32 -0400, Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> >>> 5. Extend cthon tests with callback operations tests (Peter Honeyman) >> >> And local/remote truncate torture tests. > Sure. Do we need a separate discussion or only this? > >> >>> 6. Performance tests - tools and benchmarks (Peter Honeyman) >> >> to 6 or 5. Cluster tests. .i.e use of more then one client in >> concertration to confuse and crash a server. > This aside from cthon, just for performance qaulification for the git. > Same do we need an additional spot or this is enough (30 min). > > I will update the agenda with your comments and I assume you will be > part of the discussion, even drive it. > > /Sorin No, Just add to 6 or 5. I'll ping "Peter Honeyman" on what do we want to put on here. Peter? Boaz ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [nfsv4] Discussion topics for the coming Bake-A-Thon 2010-09-19 14:49 ` [nfsv4] " Sorin Faibish 2010-09-19 14:59 ` Boaz Harrosh @ 2010-09-20 16:19 ` Thomas Haynes 2010-09-20 19:47 ` david.noveck 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Thomas Haynes @ 2010-09-20 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sorin Faibish Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Peter Honeyman, nfsv4@ietf.org, Boaz Harrosh [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1500 bytes --] On Sep 19, 2010, at 9:49 AM, Sorin Faibish wrote: > On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:12:32 -0400, Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> wrote: > >> On 09/18/2010 02:33 AM, Sorin Faibish wrote: >>> >>> 5. Extend cthon tests with callback operations tests (Peter Honeyman) >> >> And local/remote truncate torture tests. > Sure. Do we need a separate discussion or only this? > >> >>> 6. Performance tests - tools and benchmarks (Peter Honeyman) >> >> to 6 or 5. Cluster tests. .i.e use of more then one client in concertration >> to confuse and crash a server. > This aside from cthon, just for performance qaulification for the git. > Same do we need an additional spot or this is enough (30 min). > > I will update the agenda with your comments and I assume you will be > part of the discussion, even drive it. > > /Sorin > One subject I would like to see us address as a community is where we go with respect to our general testing strategy. We have had discussions the last several years at the Connectathons about the ability to contribute to the cthon test suites and the legal status of the code. Basically, because of the lack of understanding of the licensing, I believe companies are not contributing changes back into the shared code base. We can talk about what it would take to get the license straightened out, but it might be more expedient to acknowledge that the cthon test suite is a low bar and drive the creation of a new test suite. [-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2534 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --] _______________________________________________ nfsv4 mailing list nfsv4@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Discussion topics for the coming Bake-A-Thon 2010-09-20 16:19 ` [nfsv4] " Thomas Haynes @ 2010-09-20 19:47 ` david.noveck 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: david.noveck @ 2010-09-20 19:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: thomas, sfaibish; +Cc: linux-nfs, Honey, nfsv4, bharrosh [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2014 bytes --] I think this is an excellent suggestion. Regardless of the way we decide to go on this, I think it is important that we do something. ________________________________ From: nfsv4-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:nfsv4-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Haynes Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 12:20 PM To: faibish, sorin Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org; Peter Honeyman; nfsv4@ietf.org; Boaz Harrosh Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Discussion topics for the coming Bake-A-Thon On Sep 19, 2010, at 9:49 AM, Sorin Faibish wrote: On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:12:32 -0400, Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> wrote: On 09/18/2010 02:33 AM, Sorin Faibish wrote: 5. Extend cthon tests with callback operations tests (Peter Honeyman) And local/remote truncate torture tests. Sure. Do we need a separate discussion or only this? 6. Performance tests - tools and benchmarks (Peter Honeyman) to 6 or 5. Cluster tests. .i.e use of more then one client in concertration to confuse and crash a server. This aside from cthon, just for performance qaulification for the git. Same do we need an additional spot or this is enough (30 min). I will update the agenda with your comments and I assume you will be part of the discussion, even drive it. /Sorin One subject I would like to see us address as a community is where we go with respect to our general testing strategy. We have had discussions the last several years at the Connectathons about the ability to contribute to the cthon test suites and the legal status of the code. Basically, because of the lack of understanding of the licensing, I believe companies are not contributing changes back into the shared code base. We can talk about what it would take to get the license straightened out, but it might be more expedient to acknowledge that the cthon test suite is a low bar and drive the creation of a new test suite. [-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3577 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --] _______________________________________________ nfsv4 mailing list nfsv4@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-09-20 19:47 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2010-09-18 0:33 Discussion topics for the coming Bake-A-Thon Sorin Faibish 2010-09-19 14:12 ` Boaz Harrosh 2010-09-19 14:49 ` [nfsv4] " Sorin Faibish 2010-09-19 14:59 ` Boaz Harrosh 2010-09-20 16:19 ` [nfsv4] " Thomas Haynes 2010-09-20 19:47 ` david.noveck
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.