* [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Sept 21
@ 2010-09-20 16:50 ` Avi Kivity
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Avi Kivity @ 2010-09-20 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wright; +Cc: Sheng Yang, Dong, Eddie, qemu-devel, kvm, Nadav Har'El
On 09/20/2010 06:44 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>
nested vmx: the resurrection. Nice to see it progressing again, but
there's still a lot of ground to cover. Perhaps we can involve Intel to
speed things up?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: KVM call agenda for Sept 21
2010-09-20 16:50 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
@ 2010-09-20 19:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2010-09-20 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Avi Kivity
Cc: Chris Wright, kvm, qemu-devel, Nadav Har'El, Dong, Eddie,
Sheng Yang
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 06:50:55PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 09/20/2010 06:44 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
> >Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
> >
>
> nested vmx: the resurrection. Nice to see it progressing again, but
> there's still a lot of ground to cover. Perhaps we can involve
> Intel to speed things up?
Hotplug
> --
> error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Sept 21
@ 2010-09-20 19:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2010-09-20 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Avi Kivity
Cc: Chris Wright, Nadav Har'El, kvm, Dong, Eddie, qemu-devel,
Sheng Yang
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 06:50:55PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 09/20/2010 06:44 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
> >Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
> >
>
> nested vmx: the resurrection. Nice to see it progressing again, but
> there's still a lot of ground to cover. Perhaps we can involve
> Intel to speed things up?
Hotplug
> --
> error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: KVM call agenda for Sept 21
2010-09-20 19:15 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2010-09-20 19:30 ` Anthony Liguori
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Anthony Liguori @ 2010-09-20 19:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael S. Tsirkin
Cc: Avi Kivity, Chris Wright, kvm, qemu-devel, Nadav Har'El,
Dong, Eddie, Sheng Yang
On 09/20/2010 02:15 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 06:50:55PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> On 09/20/2010 06:44 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
>>
>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>>
>>>
>> nested vmx: the resurrection. Nice to see it progressing again, but
>> there's still a lot of ground to cover. Perhaps we can involve
>> Intel to speed things up?
>>
> Hotplug
>
Drive caching. Discussion on the mailing list but regardless of my own
opinions of what it should be, we really need to have a clearly defined
set of guarantees for all of the caching modes. This is something I get
asked very frequently about from end users because there's lack of
clarity about what each of the caching options do with respect to data
integrity.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
>
>> --
>> error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Sept 21
@ 2010-09-20 19:30 ` Anthony Liguori
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Anthony Liguori @ 2010-09-20 19:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael S. Tsirkin
Cc: Chris Wright, Nadav Har'El, kvm, Dong, Eddie, qemu-devel,
Avi Kivity, Sheng Yang
On 09/20/2010 02:15 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 06:50:55PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> On 09/20/2010 06:44 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
>>
>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>>
>>>
>> nested vmx: the resurrection. Nice to see it progressing again, but
>> there's still a lot of ground to cover. Perhaps we can involve
>> Intel to speed things up?
>>
> Hotplug
>
Drive caching. Discussion on the mailing list but regardless of my own
opinions of what it should be, we really need to have a clearly defined
set of guarantees for all of the caching modes. This is something I get
asked very frequently about from end users because there's lack of
clarity about what each of the caching options do with respect to data
integrity.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
>
>> --
>> error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* RE: KVM call agenda for Sept 21
2010-09-20 16:50 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
@ 2010-09-21 3:37 ` Nakajima, Jun
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Nakajima, Jun @ 2010-09-21 3:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Avi Kivity, Chris Wright
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Nadav Har'El,
Dong, Eddie, Sheng Yang
Avi Kivity wrote on Mon, 20 Sep 2010 at 09:50:55:
> On 09/20/2010 06:44 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>
> nested vmx: the resurrection. Nice to see it progressing again, but
> there's still a lot of ground to cover. Perhaps we can involve Intel to
> speed things up?
>
Hi, Avi
What are you looking for?
Jun
___
Intel Open Source Technology Center
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] RE: KVM call agenda for Sept 21
@ 2010-09-21 3:37 ` Nakajima, Jun
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Nakajima, Jun @ 2010-09-21 3:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Avi Kivity, Chris Wright
Cc: Sheng Yang, Dong, Eddie, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Nadav Har'El
Avi Kivity wrote on Mon, 20 Sep 2010 at 09:50:55:
> On 09/20/2010 06:44 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>
> nested vmx: the resurrection. Nice to see it progressing again, but
> there's still a lot of ground to cover. Perhaps we can involve Intel to
> speed things up?
>
Hi, Avi
What are you looking for?
Jun
___
Intel Open Source Technology Center
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: KVM call agenda for Sept 21
2010-09-21 3:37 ` [Qemu-devel] " Nakajima, Jun
@ 2010-09-21 11:48 ` Avi Kivity
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Avi Kivity @ 2010-09-21 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nakajima, Jun
Cc: Chris Wright, kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Nadav Har'El, Dong, Eddie, Sheng Yang
On 09/21/2010 05:37 AM, Nakajima, Jun wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote on Mon, 20 Sep 2010 at 09:50:55:
>
> > On 09/20/2010 06:44 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
> >> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
> >>
> > nested vmx: the resurrection. Nice to see it progressing again, but
> > there's still a lot of ground to cover. Perhaps we can involve Intel to
> > speed things up?
> >
> Hi, Avi
>
> What are you looking for?
>
>
Help in getting the patchset in. Reviewing is always appreciated (while
it tends to increase the time, the result is usually better). If we can
find a way to share the work, even better.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Sept 21
@ 2010-09-21 11:48 ` Avi Kivity
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Avi Kivity @ 2010-09-21 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nakajima, Jun
Cc: Chris Wright, Nadav Har'El, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Dong, Eddie,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Sheng Yang
On 09/21/2010 05:37 AM, Nakajima, Jun wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote on Mon, 20 Sep 2010 at 09:50:55:
>
> > On 09/20/2010 06:44 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
> >> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
> >>
> > nested vmx: the resurrection. Nice to see it progressing again, but
> > there's still a lot of ground to cover. Perhaps we can involve Intel to
> > speed things up?
> >
> Hi, Avi
>
> What are you looking for?
>
>
Help in getting the patchset in. Reviewing is always appreciated (while
it tends to increase the time, the result is usually better). If we can
find a way to share the work, even better.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread