Re: [PATCH 0/8] De-couple sysfs memory directories from memory sections

[Nathan Fontenot <nfont@austin.ibm.com>]

On 09/23/2010 01:40 PM, Balbir Singh wrote:
> * Nathan Fontenot <nfont@austin.ibm.com> [2010-09-22 09:15:43]:
> 
>> This set of patches decouples the concept that a single memory
>> section corresponds to a single directory in 
>> /sys/devices/system/memory/.  On systems
>> with large amounts of memory (1+ TB) there are performance issues
>> related to creating the large number of sysfs directories.  For
>> a powerpc machine with 1 TB of memory we are creating 63,000+
>> directories.  This is resulting in boot times of around 45-50
>> minutes for systems with 1 TB of memory and 8 hours for systems
>> with 2 TB of memory.  With this patch set applied I am now seeing
>> boot times of 5 minutes or less.
>>
>> The root of this issue is in sysfs directory creation. Every time
>> a directory is created a string compare is done against all sibling
>> directories to ensure we do not create duplicates.  The list of
>> directory nodes in sysfs is kept as an unsorted list which results
>> in this being an exponentially longer operation as the number of
>> directories are created.
>>
>> The solution solved by this patch set is to allow a single
>> directory in sysfs to span multiple memory sections.  This is
>> controlled by an optional architecturally defined function
>> memory_block_size_bytes().  The default definition of this
>> routine returns a memory block size equal to the memory section
>> size. This maintains the current layout of sysfs memory
>> directories as it appears to userspace to remain the same as it
>> is today.
>>
>> For architectures that define their own version of this routine,
>> as is done for powerpc in this patchset, the view in userspace
>> would change such that each memoryXXX directory would span
>> multiple memory sections.  The number of sections spanned would
>> depend on the value reported by memory_block_size_bytes.
>>
>> In both cases a new file 'end_phys_index' is created in each
>> memoryXXX directory.  This file will contain the physical id
>> of the last memory section covered by the sysfs directory.  For
>> the default case, the value in 'end_phys_index' will be the same
>> as in the existing 'phys_index' file.
>>
> 
> What does this mean for memory hotplug or hotunplug? 
> 

Memory hotplug will function on a memory block size basis.  For
architectures that do not define their own memory_block_size_bytes()
routine, they will get the default size and everything will work
the same as it does today.

For architectures that define their own memory_block_size_bytes()
routine and have multiple memory sections per memory block, hotplug
operations will add or remove all of the memory sections in the memory
memory block.

-Nathan