All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@gmail.com>
To: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Dimitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	trivial@kernel.org, Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v5]update broken web addresses in the kernel.
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 06:41:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CA1F082.2010900@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1009281713410.276@localhost>

On 09/28/2010 12:35 AM, Finn Thain wrote:
>
> On Tue, 28 Sep 2010, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>
>> o.k... I'll make the changes to the arch patch, and combine the two, and
>> send it to jiri..
>
> Why?
>
> My advice is don't do it unless you want to waste reviewers' time.
>
>> as for the names and signed offs is what is below fine or do I need to
>> change some of them?
>
> If you combine patch 1 and patch 2 and submit that as patch 3, you will
> likely have to CC patch 3 to everyone to whom you sent patch 1 plus
> everyone to whom you sent patch 2. You must also change any "acked-by" to
> "Cc", since patch 3 is new.
>
> Keep the same CC list since Jiri is already on it ("trivial@kernel.org").
>
> Finn
>

alright.. so it will be two patches then..(not the best at the CC etc.. 
thing) cool... and thanks again for reviewing this for me..(back 
breaking work, but somebodies _gots_ to do it..)

Justin P. Mattock

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@gmail.com>
To: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Dimitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	trivial@kernel.org, Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v5]update broken web addresses in the kernel.
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:41:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CA1F082.2010900@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1009281713410.276@localhost>

On 09/28/2010 12:35 AM, Finn Thain wrote:
>
> On Tue, 28 Sep 2010, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>
>> o.k... I'll make the changes to the arch patch, and combine the two, and
>> send it to jiri..
>
> Why?
>
> My advice is don't do it unless you want to waste reviewers' time.
>
>> as for the names and signed offs is what is below fine or do I need to
>> change some of them?
>
> If you combine patch 1 and patch 2 and submit that as patch 3, you will
> likely have to CC patch 3 to everyone to whom you sent patch 1 plus
> everyone to whom you sent patch 2. You must also change any "acked-by" to
> "Cc", since patch 3 is new.
>
> Keep the same CC list since Jiri is already on it ("trivial@kernel.org").
>
> Finn
>

alright.. so it will be two patches then..(not the best at the CC etc.. 
thing) cool... and thanks again for reviewing this for me..(back 
breaking work, but somebodies _gots_ to do it..)

Justin P. Mattock

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@gmail.com>
To: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
Cc: trivial@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
	Dimitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v5]update broken web addresses in the kernel.
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 06:41:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CA1F082.2010900@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1009281713410.276@localhost>

On 09/28/2010 12:35 AM, Finn Thain wrote:
>
> On Tue, 28 Sep 2010, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>
>> o.k... I'll make the changes to the arch patch, and combine the two, and
>> send it to jiri..
>
> Why?
>
> My advice is don't do it unless you want to waste reviewers' time.
>
>> as for the names and signed offs is what is below fine or do I need to
>> change some of them?
>
> If you combine patch 1 and patch 2 and submit that as patch 3, you will
> likely have to CC patch 3 to everyone to whom you sent patch 1 plus
> everyone to whom you sent patch 2. You must also change any "acked-by" to
> "Cc", since patch 3 is new.
>
> Keep the same CC list since Jiri is already on it ("trivial@kernel.org").
>
> Finn
>

alright.. so it will be two patches then..(not the best at the CC etc.. 
thing) cool... and thanks again for reviewing this for me..(back 
breaking work, but somebodies _gots_ to do it..)

Justin P. Mattock

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-28 13:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-28  4:19 [RFC v5]update broken web addresses in the kernel Justin P. Mattock
2010-09-28  4:19 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-09-28  4:19 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-09-28  6:22 ` Finn Thain
2010-09-28  7:05   ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-09-28  7:35     ` Finn Thain
2010-09-28 13:41       ` Justin P. Mattock [this message]
2010-09-28 13:41         ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-09-28 13:41         ` Justin P. Mattock

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CA1F082.2010900@gmail.com \
    --to=justinmattock@gmail.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=fthain@telegraphics.com.au \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    --cc=trivial@kernel.org \
    --cc=vapier.adi@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.