From: linus.walleij@stericsson.com (Linus Walleij)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gic: Add functions to save and restore gic state
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:04:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CAB3074.5010106@stericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1285901335-26354-1-git-send-email-ccross@android.com>
Colin Cross wrote:
> on systems with idle states which power-gate the logic including
> the gic, such as tegra, the gic distributor needs to be shut down
> and restored on entry and exit from the architecture idle code
Nice!
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +void gic_dist_save(unsigned int gic_nr)
> +{
> + unsigned int max_irq = gic_data[gic_nr].max_irq;
> + void __iomem *dist_base = gic_data[gic_nr].dist_base;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR)
> + BUG();
> +
> + _gic_dist_exit(gic_nr);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < DIV_ROUND_UP(max_irq, 16); i++)
> + gic_data[gic_nr].saved_conf[i] =
> + readl(dist_base + GIC_DIST_CONFIG + i * 4);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < DIV_ROUND_UP(max_irq, 4); i++)
> + gic_data[gic_nr].saved_pri[i] =
> + readl(dist_base + GIC_DIST_PRI + i * 4);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < DIV_ROUND_UP(max_irq, 4); i++)
> + gic_data[gic_nr].saved_target[i] =
> + readl(dist_base + GIC_DIST_TARGET + i * 4);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < DIV_ROUND_UP(max_irq, 32); i++)
> + gic_data[gic_nr].saved_enable[i] =
> + readl(dist_base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_SET + i * 4);
> +}
> +
> +void gic_dist_restore(unsigned int gic_nr)
> +{
> + unsigned int max_irq;
> + unsigned int i;
> + void __iomem *dist_base;
> + void __iomem *cpu_base;
> +
> + if (gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR)
> + BUG();
> +
> + _gic_dist_init(gic_nr);
> +
> + max_irq = gic_data[gic_nr].max_irq;
> + dist_base = gic_data[gic_nr].dist_base;
> + cpu_base = gic_data[gic_nr].cpu_base;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < DIV_ROUND_UP(max_irq, 16); i++)
> + writel(gic_data[gic_nr].saved_conf[i],
> + dist_base + GIC_DIST_CONFIG + i * 4);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < DIV_ROUND_UP(max_irq, 4); i++)
> + writel(gic_data[gic_nr].saved_pri[i],
> + dist_base + GIC_DIST_PRI + i * 4);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < DIV_ROUND_UP(max_irq, 4); i++)
> + writel(gic_data[gic_nr].saved_target[i],
> + dist_base + GIC_DIST_TARGET + i * 4);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < DIV_ROUND_UP(max_irq, 32); i++)
> + writel(gic_data[gic_nr].saved_enable[i],
> + dist_base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_SET + i * 4);
> +
> + writel(1, dist_base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
> + writel(0xf0, cpu_base + GIC_CPU_PRIMASK);
> + writel(1, cpu_base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
> +}
> +#endif
For gic_dist_save()/gic_dist_restore() can you write some
comment to each function about the implicit semantics for
calling them?
If I *guess* correctly gic_dist_save() must be called in
something like a platform idle function after disabling all
IRQs but before sleeping, conversely gic_dist_restort()
must be called after sleeping but before re-enabling the
IRQs.
Apart from that it looks good to me so with this
simple comment-fix it's:
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
To: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Gary King <gking@nvidia.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Rabin VINCENT <rabin.vincent@stericsson.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rickard ANDERSSON <rickard.andersson@stericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gic: Add functions to save and restore gic state
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:04:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CAB3074.5010106@stericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1285901335-26354-1-git-send-email-ccross@android.com>
Colin Cross wrote:
> on systems with idle states which power-gate the logic including
> the gic, such as tegra, the gic distributor needs to be shut down
> and restored on entry and exit from the architecture idle code
Nice!
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +void gic_dist_save(unsigned int gic_nr)
> +{
> + unsigned int max_irq = gic_data[gic_nr].max_irq;
> + void __iomem *dist_base = gic_data[gic_nr].dist_base;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR)
> + BUG();
> +
> + _gic_dist_exit(gic_nr);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < DIV_ROUND_UP(max_irq, 16); i++)
> + gic_data[gic_nr].saved_conf[i] =
> + readl(dist_base + GIC_DIST_CONFIG + i * 4);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < DIV_ROUND_UP(max_irq, 4); i++)
> + gic_data[gic_nr].saved_pri[i] =
> + readl(dist_base + GIC_DIST_PRI + i * 4);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < DIV_ROUND_UP(max_irq, 4); i++)
> + gic_data[gic_nr].saved_target[i] =
> + readl(dist_base + GIC_DIST_TARGET + i * 4);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < DIV_ROUND_UP(max_irq, 32); i++)
> + gic_data[gic_nr].saved_enable[i] =
> + readl(dist_base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_SET + i * 4);
> +}
> +
> +void gic_dist_restore(unsigned int gic_nr)
> +{
> + unsigned int max_irq;
> + unsigned int i;
> + void __iomem *dist_base;
> + void __iomem *cpu_base;
> +
> + if (gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR)
> + BUG();
> +
> + _gic_dist_init(gic_nr);
> +
> + max_irq = gic_data[gic_nr].max_irq;
> + dist_base = gic_data[gic_nr].dist_base;
> + cpu_base = gic_data[gic_nr].cpu_base;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < DIV_ROUND_UP(max_irq, 16); i++)
> + writel(gic_data[gic_nr].saved_conf[i],
> + dist_base + GIC_DIST_CONFIG + i * 4);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < DIV_ROUND_UP(max_irq, 4); i++)
> + writel(gic_data[gic_nr].saved_pri[i],
> + dist_base + GIC_DIST_PRI + i * 4);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < DIV_ROUND_UP(max_irq, 4); i++)
> + writel(gic_data[gic_nr].saved_target[i],
> + dist_base + GIC_DIST_TARGET + i * 4);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < DIV_ROUND_UP(max_irq, 32); i++)
> + writel(gic_data[gic_nr].saved_enable[i],
> + dist_base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_SET + i * 4);
> +
> + writel(1, dist_base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
> + writel(0xf0, cpu_base + GIC_CPU_PRIMASK);
> + writel(1, cpu_base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
> +}
> +#endif
For gic_dist_save()/gic_dist_restore() can you write some
comment to each function about the implicit semantics for
calling them?
If I *guess* correctly gic_dist_save() must be called in
something like a platform idle function after disabling all
IRQs but before sleeping, conversely gic_dist_restort()
must be called after sleeping but before re-enabling the
IRQs.
Apart from that it looks good to me so with this
simple comment-fix it's:
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-05 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-01 2:48 [PATCH 1/2] gic: Add functions to save and restore gic state Colin Cross
2010-10-01 2:48 ` Colin Cross
2010-10-01 2:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] gic: Export irq chip functions Colin Cross
2010-10-01 2:48 ` Colin Cross
2010-10-02 18:03 ` Linus Walleij
2010-10-02 18:03 ` Linus Walleij
2010-10-02 20:21 ` Colin Cross
2010-10-02 20:21 ` Colin Cross
2010-10-05 14:04 ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2010-10-05 14:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] gic: Add functions to save and restore gic state Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CAB3074.5010106@stericsson.com \
--to=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.