All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: AT91: Fix power-saving in idle-mode on 926T processors
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 15:51:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CAF21CE.5000901@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101008122918.GA30252@game.jcrosoft.org>

Russell,

Le 08/10/2010 14:29, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD :
> On 21:44 Thu 07 Oct     , Anders Larsen wrote:
>> According to Atmel, their 926T processors (AT91 post RM9200) requires
>> 'Wait for Interrupt' mode be entered right after disabling the processor clock
>> in order to minimise current consumption when idle, so do both provided we're
>> not running on a 920T (an RM9200).
>>
>> Furthermore, get rid of the #ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL, since arch_idle()
>> can be turned off completely with the kernel parameter 'nohlt'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anders Larsen <al@alarsen.net>
>> Cc: Andrew Victor <avictor.za@gmail.com>
> please rebase against this branch
> 
> git://github.com/at91linux/linux-2.6-at91.git branch for-rmk

This patch seems already in your "master" branch
(5c189208b606a85b4e97109af70d59f10a42fdfd).

Do you want me to rebase this patch or do you mange merging with "AT91:
fix use of clock disable on idle for AT91x40 devices"
(cb809b1a5ebffca8cf0314b788919989e8e4ab5f) ?
already in your "devel" and "devel-stable" branches?

Best regards,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	Anders Larsen <al@alarsen.net>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Victor <avictor.za@gmail.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: AT91: Fix power-saving in idle-mode on 926T processors
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 15:51:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CAF21CE.5000901@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101008122918.GA30252@game.jcrosoft.org>

Russell,

Le 08/10/2010 14:29, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD :
> On 21:44 Thu 07 Oct     , Anders Larsen wrote:
>> According to Atmel, their 926T processors (AT91 post RM9200) requires
>> 'Wait for Interrupt' mode be entered right after disabling the processor clock
>> in order to minimise current consumption when idle, so do both provided we're
>> not running on a 920T (an RM9200).
>>
>> Furthermore, get rid of the #ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL, since arch_idle()
>> can be turned off completely with the kernel parameter 'nohlt'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anders Larsen <al@alarsen.net>
>> Cc: Andrew Victor <avictor.za@gmail.com>
> please rebase against this branch
> 
> git://github.com/at91linux/linux-2.6-at91.git branch for-rmk

This patch seems already in your "master" branch
(5c189208b606a85b4e97109af70d59f10a42fdfd).

Do you want me to rebase this patch or do you mange merging with "AT91:
fix use of clock disable on idle for AT91x40 devices"
(cb809b1a5ebffca8cf0314b788919989e8e4ab5f) ?
already in your "devel" and "devel-stable" branches?

Best regards,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre


  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-08 13:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-07 19:44 AT91: Fix power-saving in idle-mode on 926T processors Anders Larsen
2010-10-07 19:44 ` Anders Larsen
2010-10-08 12:29 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-10-08 12:29   ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-10-08 13:51   ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2010-10-08 13:51     ` Nicolas Ferre
2011-01-10 15:05 ` Peter Korsgaard
2011-01-10 15:32   ` Anders Larsen
2011-01-10 15:43     ` Peter Korsgaard
2011-01-10 19:23       ` Uwe Kleine-König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CAF21CE.5000901@atmel.com \
    --to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.