From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] blk: fix a wrong accounting of hd_struct->in_flight
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:55:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CB6FDB7.5010501@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CB6FC1C.3050801@jp.fujitsu.com>
On 2010-10-14 14:48, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> Index: linux-2.6.36-rc7/block/blk-core.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.36-rc7.orig/block/blk-core.c 2010-10-07 05:39:52.000000000 +0900
> +++ linux-2.6.36-rc7/block/blk-core.c 2010-10-14 17:25:43.000000000 +0900
> @@ -66,9 +66,15 @@ static void drive_stat_acct(struct reque
> cpu = part_stat_lock();
> part = disk_map_sector_rcu(rq->rq_disk, blk_rq_pos(rq));
>
> - if (!new_io)
> + if (!new_io) {
> + if (unlikely(rq->part != part)) {
> + part_dec_in_flight(rq->part, rw);
> + part_inc_in_flight(part, rw);
> + rq->part = part;
> + }
> part_stat_inc(cpu, part, merges[rw]);
> - else {
> + } else {
> + rq->part = part;
> part_round_stats(cpu, part);
> part_inc_in_flight(part, rw);
> }
I was thinking that we'd do away with the lookup always if ->part was
already set. It will probably require a quiscing of IO on partition
table reload, though.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-14 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-12 6:38 [PATCH] blk: fix a wrong accounting of hd_struct->in_flight Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2010-10-12 8:19 ` Jens Axboe
2010-10-14 12:48 ` [PATCH v2] " Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2010-10-14 12:55 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2010-10-15 8:39 ` [PATCH v3] " Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2010-10-15 10:04 ` Jens Axboe
2010-10-18 8:28 ` [PATCH v4] " Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2010-10-18 8:34 ` Jens Axboe
2010-10-18 12:19 ` [PATCH v5] " Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2010-10-18 12:21 ` Jens Axboe
2010-10-19 2:22 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2010-10-19 10:02 ` Jens Axboe
2010-10-14 6:07 ` [PATCH] " KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-10-14 12:44 ` Jens Axboe
2010-10-14 23:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-10-15 7:30 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CB6FDB7.5010501@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.