From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GITT PULL] AT91: second pull for 2.6.37 merge window
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:05:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CC01075.8000401@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101020191125.GA22100@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Le 20/10/2010 21:11, Russell King - ARM Linux :
> Did you miss this?
>
> | Tuesday evening my time (BST, so UTC+1h) is the last time I'm merging
> | anything into my git tree.
> |
> | With the upcoming change to the debug macro infrastructure, there are
> | two options for people who have new board support code external to my
> | tree:
> |
> | 1. Send me a pull request (based on Linus' tree not mine) by Tuesday.
> |
> | 2. Eat merge conflicts and build breakage for breakfast when my tree
> | merges into mainline. ;)
> |
> | No further complaints about this please - there's been plenty of warning
> | about these debug macro changes.
Well, no. I had chosen the second option - and I am quite confident with
breakage as I think I have anticipated them...
So, will you do another pull round during Linus' merge window? Reading
your answer I suspect that you will not ;-)
If not I will then directly send the pull request to Linus.
Thanks, bye,
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 01:06:42PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> Hi Russell,
>>
>> Could you please pull the following:
>>
>> git://github.com/at91linux/linux-2.6-at91.git for_rmk_bis
>>
>> This contains second set of AT91 update for 2.6.37
>> merge window. All has been discussed on the list.
>> It is based on latest linus' git tree:
>> commit 51ea8a88aae425915b458bfe295f1f10a3d52781
>>
>> Nicolas Ferre (3):
>> AT91: trivial: align comment of at91sam9g20_reset with one more tab
>> AT91: reset routine cleanup, remove not needed icache flush
>> AT91: reset: extend alternate reset procedure to several chips
>>
>> Peter Gsellmann (1):
>> AT91: add board support for Pcontrol_G20
>>
>> Peter Horton (1):
>> AT91: Fix AT91SAM9G20 reset as per the errata in the data sheet
>>
>> arch/arm/configs/pcontrol_g20_defconfig | 175 +++++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig | 6 +
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile | 13 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9260.c | 7 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9261.c | 7 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9263.c | 7 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9_alt_reset.S | 48 +++++
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9rl.c | 7 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/board-pcontrol-g20.c | 322 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h | 3 +
>> 10 files changed, 565 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/configs/pcontrol_g20_defconfig
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9_alt_reset.S
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-at91/board-pcontrol-g20.c
>>
>> Thanks a lot, best regards,
>> --
>> Nicolas Ferre
>>
--
Nicolas Ferre
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Victor <linux@maxim.org.za>,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
"'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org'"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Horton <phorton@bitbox.co.uk>,
pgsellmann@portner-elektronik.at
Subject: Re: [GITT PULL] AT91: second pull for 2.6.37 merge window
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:05:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CC01075.8000401@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101020191125.GA22100@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Le 20/10/2010 21:11, Russell King - ARM Linux :
> Did you miss this?
>
> | Tuesday evening my time (BST, so UTC+1h) is the last time I'm merging
> | anything into my git tree.
> |
> | With the upcoming change to the debug macro infrastructure, there are
> | two options for people who have new board support code external to my
> | tree:
> |
> | 1. Send me a pull request (based on Linus' tree not mine) by Tuesday.
> |
> | 2. Eat merge conflicts and build breakage for breakfast when my tree
> | merges into mainline. ;)
> |
> | No further complaints about this please - there's been plenty of warning
> | about these debug macro changes.
Well, no. I had chosen the second option - and I am quite confident with
breakage as I think I have anticipated them...
So, will you do another pull round during Linus' merge window? Reading
your answer I suspect that you will not ;-)
If not I will then directly send the pull request to Linus.
Thanks, bye,
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 01:06:42PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> Hi Russell,
>>
>> Could you please pull the following:
>>
>> git://github.com/at91linux/linux-2.6-at91.git for_rmk_bis
>>
>> This contains second set of AT91 update for 2.6.37
>> merge window. All has been discussed on the list.
>> It is based on latest linus' git tree:
>> commit 51ea8a88aae425915b458bfe295f1f10a3d52781
>>
>> Nicolas Ferre (3):
>> AT91: trivial: align comment of at91sam9g20_reset with one more tab
>> AT91: reset routine cleanup, remove not needed icache flush
>> AT91: reset: extend alternate reset procedure to several chips
>>
>> Peter Gsellmann (1):
>> AT91: add board support for Pcontrol_G20
>>
>> Peter Horton (1):
>> AT91: Fix AT91SAM9G20 reset as per the errata in the data sheet
>>
>> arch/arm/configs/pcontrol_g20_defconfig | 175 +++++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig | 6 +
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile | 13 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9260.c | 7 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9261.c | 7 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9263.c | 7 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9_alt_reset.S | 48 +++++
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9rl.c | 7 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/board-pcontrol-g20.c | 322 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h | 3 +
>> 10 files changed, 565 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/configs/pcontrol_g20_defconfig
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9_alt_reset.S
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-at91/board-pcontrol-g20.c
>>
>> Thanks a lot, best regards,
>> --
>> Nicolas Ferre
>>
--
Nicolas Ferre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-21 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-20 11:06 [GITT PULL] AT91: second pull for 2.6.37 merge window Nicolas Ferre
2010-10-20 11:06 ` Nicolas Ferre
2010-10-20 19:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-10-20 19:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-10-21 10:05 ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2010-10-21 10:05 ` Nicolas Ferre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CC01075.8000401@atmel.com \
--to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.