All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: 2.6.36: Dropped interrupts in ata_piix
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:13:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CC5C8C4.8010602@google.com> (raw)

Hi Tejun,

I'm having problems reliably booting 2.6.36 on one of my development 
systems whereby it looks like the ata_piix driver isn't acknowledging 
interrupts.  I went through a bit of the recent history here, and it 
seems that things clear up for me if I revert the following two commits 
in my tree:

1c5afdf7 "libata-sff: separate out BMDMA init"
c3b28894 "libata-sff: separate out BMDMA irq handler"

I usually don't get a trace, but I did get this blurted out once on the 
console:


kinit: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly.
INIT: version 2.78 booting
[    5.419165] irq 20: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
[    5.420140] Pid: 0, comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 2.6.36-smp-mikew 
#5gca29cdd
[    5.420140] Call Trace:
[    5.420140]  <IRQ>  [<ffffffff810b207f>] __report_bad_irq+0x3d/0x8c
[    5.420140]  [<ffffffff810b21e6>] note_interrupt+0x118/0x17e
[    5.420140]  [<ffffffff810b29be>] handle_fasteoi_irq+0xa7/0xcc
[    5.420140]  [<ffffffff81032da5>] handle_irq+0x24/0x2f
[    5.420140]  [<ffffffff81453744>] do_IRQ+0x5c/0xc3
[    5.420140]  [<ffffffff8144d853>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xa
[    5.420140]  <EOI>  [<ffffffff81037a64>] ? mwait_idle+0x93/0x9b
[    5.420140]  [<ffffffff81037a0a>] ? mwait_idle+0x39/0x9b
[    5.420140]  [<ffffffff8102faee>] cpu_idle+0x63/0xd5
[    5.420140]  [<ffffffff8193d340>] start_secondary+0x192/0x196
[    5.420140] handlers:
[    5.420140] [<ffffffff812e26e6>] (ata_bmdma_interrupt+0x0/0x17)
[    5.420140] Disabling IRQ #20
[   34.720103] ata1: lost interrupt (Status 0x51)
[   34.724569] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6 
frozen
[   34.731612] ata1.00: BMDMA stat 0x26, BMDMA stat 0x0, BMDMA stat 0x0, 
BMDMA stat 0x0, BMDMA stat 0x0
[   34.740750] ata1.00: failed command: READ DMA
[   34.745115] ata1.00: cmd c8/00:a0:f7:78:09/00:00:00:00:00/e0 tag 0 
dma 81920 in
[   34.745116]          res 40/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 
0x24 (host bus error)
[   34.760490] ata1.00: status: { DRDY }
[   34.764180] ata1: soft resetting link
[   35.143059] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
[   35.147332] ata1.00: device reported invalid CHS sector 0
[   35.152730] ata1: EH complete

As you can see above, something looks to be wrong with ata_bmdma_interrupt.

Have you seen this problem before?

Thanks,

Mike Waychison

             reply	other threads:[~2010-10-25 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-25 18:13 Mike Waychison [this message]
2010-10-26  9:58 ` 2.6.36: Dropped interrupts in ata_piix Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 18:08   ` Mike Waychison
2010-10-27  2:33     ` Mike Waychison
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-11-29 11:41 Mikko Korkalo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CC5C8C4.8010602@google.com \
    --to=mikew@google.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.