* [PATCH] ipv4: Flush per-ns routing cache more sanely.
@ 2010-10-26 17:34 David Miller
2010-10-26 18:57 ` Eric Dumazet
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2010-10-26 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: daniel.lezcano, ebiederm
Flush the routing cache only of entries that match the
network namespace in which the purge event occurred.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---
Could I get some testing and performance analysis feedback
on this change? I don't want it to just die :-)
THanks!
diff --git a/include/net/route.h b/include/net/route.h
index 7e5e73b..8d24761 100644
--- a/include/net/route.h
+++ b/include/net/route.h
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ extern int ip_rt_init(void);
extern void ip_rt_redirect(__be32 old_gw, __be32 dst, __be32 new_gw,
__be32 src, struct net_device *dev);
extern void rt_cache_flush(struct net *net, int how);
-extern void rt_cache_flush_batch(void);
+extern void rt_cache_flush_batch(struct net *net);
extern int __ip_route_output_key(struct net *, struct rtable **, const struct flowi *flp);
extern int ip_route_output_key(struct net *, struct rtable **, struct flowi *flp);
extern int ip_route_output_flow(struct net *, struct rtable **rp, struct flowi *flp, struct sock *sk, int flags);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c b/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
index 36e27c2..828d471 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
@@ -999,7 +999,7 @@ static int fib_netdev_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event, vo
rt_cache_flush(dev_net(dev), 0);
break;
case NETDEV_UNREGISTER_BATCH:
- rt_cache_flush_batch();
+ rt_cache_flush_batch(dev_net(dev));
break;
}
return NOTIFY_DONE;
diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
index d6cb2bf..f6860eb 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -712,13 +712,14 @@ static inline int rt_is_expired(struct rtable *rth)
* Can be called by a softirq or a process.
* In the later case, we want to be reschedule if necessary
*/
-static void rt_do_flush(int process_context)
+static void rt_do_flush(struct net *net, int process_context)
{
unsigned int i;
struct rtable *rth, *next;
- struct rtable * tail;
for (i = 0; i <= rt_hash_mask; i++) {
+ struct rtable *list, **pprev;
+
if (process_context && need_resched())
cond_resched();
rth = rt_hash_table[i].chain;
@@ -726,41 +727,28 @@ static void rt_do_flush(int process_context)
continue;
spin_lock_bh(rt_hash_lock_addr(i));
-#ifdef CONFIG_NET_NS
- {
- struct rtable ** prev, * p;
- rth = rt_hash_table[i].chain;
+ list = NULL;
+ pprev = &rt_hash_table[i].chain;
+ rth = *pprev;
+ while (rth) {
+ next = rth->dst.rt_next;
+ if (net_eq(dev_net(rth->dst.dev), net)) {
+ *pprev = next;
- /* defer releasing the head of the list after spin_unlock */
- for (tail = rth; tail; tail = tail->dst.rt_next)
- if (!rt_is_expired(tail))
- break;
- if (rth != tail)
- rt_hash_table[i].chain = tail;
-
- /* call rt_free on entries after the tail requiring flush */
- prev = &rt_hash_table[i].chain;
- for (p = *prev; p; p = next) {
- next = p->dst.rt_next;
- if (!rt_is_expired(p)) {
- prev = &p->dst.rt_next;
+ rth->dst.rt_next = list;
+ list = rth;
} else {
- *prev = next;
- rt_free(p);
+ pprev = &rth->dst.rt_next;
}
+ rth = next;
}
- }
-#else
- rth = rt_hash_table[i].chain;
- rt_hash_table[i].chain = NULL;
- tail = NULL;
-#endif
+
spin_unlock_bh(rt_hash_lock_addr(i));
- for (; rth != tail; rth = next) {
- next = rth->dst.rt_next;
- rt_free(rth);
+ for (; list; list = next) {
+ next = list->dst.rt_next;
+ rt_free(list);
}
}
}
@@ -906,13 +894,13 @@ void rt_cache_flush(struct net *net, int delay)
{
rt_cache_invalidate(net);
if (delay >= 0)
- rt_do_flush(!in_softirq());
+ rt_do_flush(net, !in_softirq());
}
/* Flush previous cache invalidated entries from the cache */
-void rt_cache_flush_batch(void)
+void rt_cache_flush_batch(struct net *net)
{
- rt_do_flush(!in_softirq());
+ rt_do_flush(net, !in_softirq());
}
static void rt_emergency_hash_rebuild(struct net *net)
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] ipv4: Flush per-ns routing cache more sanely. 2010-10-26 17:34 [PATCH] ipv4: Flush per-ns routing cache more sanely David Miller @ 2010-10-26 18:57 ` Eric Dumazet 2010-10-26 18:57 ` Daniel Lezcano 2010-10-26 19:05 ` Eric W. Biederman 2 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Eric Dumazet @ 2010-10-26 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Miller; +Cc: netdev, daniel.lezcano, ebiederm Le mardi 26 octobre 2010 à 10:34 -0700, David Miller a écrit : > Flush the routing cache only of entries that match the > network namespace in which the purge event occurred. > > Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> > --- > > Could I get some testing and performance analysis feedback > on this change? I don't want it to just die :-) > I believe its fine, thanks ! Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> I'll respin my __rcu patch, of course. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ipv4: Flush per-ns routing cache more sanely. 2010-10-26 17:34 [PATCH] ipv4: Flush per-ns routing cache more sanely David Miller 2010-10-26 18:57 ` Eric Dumazet @ 2010-10-26 18:57 ` Daniel Lezcano 2010-10-26 19:05 ` Eric W. Biederman 2 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Daniel Lezcano @ 2010-10-26 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Miller; +Cc: netdev, ebiederm On 10/26/2010 07:34 PM, David Miller wrote: > Flush the routing cache only of entries that match the > network namespace in which the purge event occurred. > > Signed-off-by: David S. Miller<davem@davemloft.net> > --- > > Could I get some testing and performance analysis feedback > on this change? I don't want it to just die :-) > Ok, will do in a couple of days. Thanks -- Daniel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ipv4: Flush per-ns routing cache more sanely. 2010-10-26 17:34 [PATCH] ipv4: Flush per-ns routing cache more sanely David Miller 2010-10-26 18:57 ` Eric Dumazet 2010-10-26 18:57 ` Daniel Lezcano @ 2010-10-26 19:05 ` Eric W. Biederman 2010-10-26 19:20 ` David Miller 2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Eric W. Biederman @ 2010-10-26 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Miller; +Cc: netdev, daniel.lezcano David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> writes: > Flush the routing cache only of entries that match the > network namespace in which the purge event occurred. > > Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> > --- > > Could I get some testing and performance analysis feedback > on this change? I don't want it to just die :-) > > THanks! > > diff --git a/include/net/route.h b/include/net/route.h > index 7e5e73b..8d24761 100644 > --- a/include/net/route.h > +++ b/include/net/route.h > @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ extern int ip_rt_init(void); > extern void ip_rt_redirect(__be32 old_gw, __be32 dst, __be32 new_gw, > __be32 src, struct net_device *dev); > extern void rt_cache_flush(struct net *net, int how); > -extern void rt_cache_flush_batch(void); > +extern void rt_cache_flush_batch(struct net *net); > extern int __ip_route_output_key(struct net *, struct rtable **, const struct flowi *flp); > extern int ip_route_output_key(struct net *, struct rtable **, struct flowi *flp); > extern int ip_route_output_flow(struct net *, struct rtable **rp, struct flowi *flp, struct sock *sk, int flags); > diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c b/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c > index 36e27c2..828d471 100644 > --- a/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c > +++ b/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c > @@ -999,7 +999,7 @@ static int fib_netdev_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event, vo > rt_cache_flush(dev_net(dev), 0); > break; > case NETDEV_UNREGISTER_BATCH: > - rt_cache_flush_batch(); > + rt_cache_flush_batch(dev_net(dev)); It still has this incorrect conversion in it. Eric ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ipv4: Flush per-ns routing cache more sanely. 2010-10-26 19:05 ` Eric W. Biederman @ 2010-10-26 19:20 ` David Miller 2010-10-26 19:30 ` Eric Dumazet 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2010-10-26 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ebiederm; +Cc: netdev, daniel.lezcano From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:05:39 -0700 >> @@ -999,7 +999,7 @@ static int fib_netdev_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event, vo >> rt_cache_flush(dev_net(dev), 0); >> break; >> case NETDEV_UNREGISTER_BATCH: >> - rt_cache_flush_batch(); >> + rt_cache_flush_batch(dev_net(dev)); > > It still has this incorrect conversion in it. Sorry I missed that, what's the exact problem with it? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ipv4: Flush per-ns routing cache more sanely. 2010-10-26 19:20 ` David Miller @ 2010-10-26 19:30 ` Eric Dumazet 2010-10-29 21:41 ` Daniel Lezcano 2010-12-20 5:14 ` David Miller 0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Eric Dumazet @ 2010-10-26 19:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Miller; +Cc: ebiederm, netdev, daniel.lezcano Le mardi 26 octobre 2010 à 12:20 -0700, David Miller a écrit : > From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) > Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:05:39 -0700 > > >> @@ -999,7 +999,7 @@ static int fib_netdev_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event, vo > >> rt_cache_flush(dev_net(dev), 0); > >> break; > >> case NETDEV_UNREGISTER_BATCH: > >> - rt_cache_flush_batch(); > >> + rt_cache_flush_batch(dev_net(dev)); > > > > It still has this incorrect conversion in it. > > Sorry I missed that, what's the exact problem with it? Because the way _BATCH operation is performed, we call it once... rollback_registered_many() calls it for the first dev queued in the list. So it should be net independant. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ipv4: Flush per-ns routing cache more sanely. 2010-10-26 19:30 ` Eric Dumazet @ 2010-10-29 21:41 ` Daniel Lezcano 2010-10-29 22:21 ` David Miller 2010-12-20 5:14 ` David Miller 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Daniel Lezcano @ 2010-10-29 21:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Dumazet; +Cc: David Miller, ebiederm, netdev On 10/26/2010 09:30 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > Le mardi 26 octobre 2010 à 12:20 -0700, David Miller a écrit : > >> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) >> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:05:39 -0700 >> >> >>>> @@ -999,7 +999,7 @@ static int fib_netdev_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event, vo >>>> rt_cache_flush(dev_net(dev), 0); >>>> break; >>>> case NETDEV_UNREGISTER_BATCH: >>>> - rt_cache_flush_batch(); >>>> + rt_cache_flush_batch(dev_net(dev)); >>>> >>> It still has this incorrect conversion in it. >>> >> Sorry I missed that, what's the exact problem with it? >> > Because the way _BATCH operation is performed, we call it once... > > rollback_registered_many() calls it for the first dev queued in the > list. > > So it should be net independant. > Dave, do you plan to send another version of this patch ? Or can I test it as it is ? Without removing a network device, I can check the routine, no ? Thanks -- Daniel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ipv4: Flush per-ns routing cache more sanely. 2010-10-29 21:41 ` Daniel Lezcano @ 2010-10-29 22:21 ` David Miller 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2010-10-29 22:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: daniel.lezcano; +Cc: eric.dumazet, ebiederm, netdev From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@free.fr> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:41:40 +0200 > do you plan to send another version of this patch ? Or can I test it > as it is ? Without removing a network device, I can check the > routine, no ? I'm backlogged with the current merge window work and fixing bugs, so feel free to test what I posted if you have the time. I'll post an updated version when time permits. Thanks. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ipv4: Flush per-ns routing cache more sanely. 2010-10-26 19:30 ` Eric Dumazet 2010-10-29 21:41 ` Daniel Lezcano @ 2010-12-20 5:14 ` David Miller 2010-12-20 17:13 ` Eric Dumazet 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2010-12-20 5:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: eric.dumazet; +Cc: ebiederm, netdev, daniel.lezcano From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:30:22 +0200 > Le mardi 26 octobre 2010 à 12:20 -0700, David Miller a écrit : >> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) >> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:05:39 -0700 >> >> >> @@ -999,7 +999,7 @@ static int fib_netdev_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event, vo >> >> rt_cache_flush(dev_net(dev), 0); >> >> break; >> >> case NETDEV_UNREGISTER_BATCH: >> >> - rt_cache_flush_batch(); >> >> + rt_cache_flush_batch(dev_net(dev)); >> > >> > It still has this incorrect conversion in it. >> >> Sorry I missed that, what's the exact problem with it? > > Because the way _BATCH operation is performed, we call it once... > > rollback_registered_many() calls it for the first dev queued in the > list. > > So it should be net independant. Thanks Eric. I finally got back to fixing this issue and respinning the patch. Please review, in particular how I handled the RCU bits. -------------------- ipv4: Flush per-ns routing cache more sanely. Flush the routing cache only of entries that match the network namespace in which the purge event occurred. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> --- include/net/route.h | 2 +- net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c | 6 +++- net/ipv4/route.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------------- 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/net/route.h b/include/net/route.h index 2700236..93e10c4 100644 --- a/include/net/route.h +++ b/include/net/route.h @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ extern int ip_rt_init(void); extern void ip_rt_redirect(__be32 old_gw, __be32 dst, __be32 new_gw, __be32 src, struct net_device *dev); extern void rt_cache_flush(struct net *net, int how); -extern void rt_cache_flush_batch(void); +extern void rt_cache_flush_batch(struct net *net); extern int __ip_route_output_key(struct net *, struct rtable **, const struct flowi *flp); extern int ip_route_output_key(struct net *, struct rtable **, struct flowi *flp); extern int ip_route_output_flow(struct net *, struct rtable **rp, struct flowi *flp, struct sock *sk, int flags); diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c b/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c index d3a1112..9f8bb68 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c +++ b/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c @@ -987,7 +987,11 @@ static int fib_netdev_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event, vo rt_cache_flush(dev_net(dev), 0); break; case NETDEV_UNREGISTER_BATCH: - rt_cache_flush_batch(); + /* The batch unregister is only called on the first + * device in the list of devices being unregistered. + * Therefore we should not pass dev_net(dev) in here. + */ + rt_cache_flush_batch(NULL); break; } return NOTIFY_DONE; diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c index ae52096..7c87d8e 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/route.c +++ b/net/ipv4/route.c @@ -717,13 +717,15 @@ static inline int rt_is_expired(struct rtable *rth) * Can be called by a softirq or a process. * In the later case, we want to be reschedule if necessary */ -static void rt_do_flush(int process_context) +static void rt_do_flush(struct net *net, int process_context) { unsigned int i; struct rtable *rth, *next; - struct rtable * tail; for (i = 0; i <= rt_hash_mask; i++) { + struct rtable __rcu **pprev; + struct rtable *list; + if (process_context && need_resched()) cond_resched(); rth = rcu_dereference_raw(rt_hash_table[i].chain); @@ -731,52 +733,34 @@ static void rt_do_flush(int process_context) continue; spin_lock_bh(rt_hash_lock_addr(i)); -#ifdef CONFIG_NET_NS - { - struct rtable __rcu **prev; - struct rtable *p; - rth = rcu_dereference_protected(rt_hash_table[i].chain, + list = NULL; + pprev = &rt_hash_table[i].chain; + rth = rcu_dereference_protected(*pprev, lockdep_is_held(rt_hash_lock_addr(i))); - /* defer releasing the head of the list after spin_unlock */ - for (tail = rth; tail; - tail = rcu_dereference_protected(tail->dst.rt_next, - lockdep_is_held(rt_hash_lock_addr(i)))) - if (!rt_is_expired(tail)) - break; - if (rth != tail) - rt_hash_table[i].chain = tail; - - /* call rt_free on entries after the tail requiring flush */ - prev = &rt_hash_table[i].chain; - for (p = rcu_dereference_protected(*prev, - lockdep_is_held(rt_hash_lock_addr(i))); - p != NULL; - p = next) { - next = rcu_dereference_protected(p->dst.rt_next, + while (rth) { + next = rcu_dereference_protected(rth->dst.rt_next, lockdep_is_held(rt_hash_lock_addr(i))); - if (!rt_is_expired(p)) { - prev = &p->dst.rt_next; + + if (!net || + net_eq(dev_net(rth->dst.dev), net)) { + rcu_assign_pointer(*pprev, next); + rcu_assign_pointer(rth->dst.rt_next, list); + list = rth; } else { - *prev = next; - rt_free(p); + pprev = &rth->dst.rt_next; } + rth = next; } - } -#else - rth = rcu_dereference_protected(rt_hash_table[i].chain, - lockdep_is_held(rt_hash_lock_addr(i))); - rcu_assign_pointer(rt_hash_table[i].chain, NULL); - tail = NULL; -#endif + spin_unlock_bh(rt_hash_lock_addr(i)); - for (; rth != tail; rth = next) { - next = rcu_dereference_protected(rth->dst.rt_next, 1); - rt_free(rth); - } - } + for (; list; list = next) { + next = rcu_dereference_protected(list->dst.rt_next, 1); + rt_free(list); + } + } } /* @@ -922,13 +906,13 @@ void rt_cache_flush(struct net *net, int delay) { rt_cache_invalidate(net); if (delay >= 0) - rt_do_flush(!in_softirq()); + rt_do_flush(net, !in_softirq()); } /* Flush previous cache invalidated entries from the cache */ -void rt_cache_flush_batch(void) +void rt_cache_flush_batch(struct net *net) { - rt_do_flush(!in_softirq()); + rt_do_flush(net, !in_softirq()); } static void rt_emergency_hash_rebuild(struct net *net) -- 1.7.3.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ipv4: Flush per-ns routing cache more sanely. 2010-12-20 5:14 ` David Miller @ 2010-12-20 17:13 ` Eric Dumazet 2010-12-20 18:36 ` David Miller 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Eric Dumazet @ 2010-12-20 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Miller; +Cc: ebiederm, netdev, daniel.lezcano Le dimanche 19 décembre 2010 à 21:14 -0800, David Miller a écrit : > From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> > Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:30:22 +0200 > > > Le mardi 26 octobre 2010 à 12:20 -0700, David Miller a écrit : > >> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) > >> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:05:39 -0700 > >> > >> >> @@ -999,7 +999,7 @@ static int fib_netdev_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event, vo > >> >> rt_cache_flush(dev_net(dev), 0); > >> >> break; > >> >> case NETDEV_UNREGISTER_BATCH: > >> >> - rt_cache_flush_batch(); > >> >> + rt_cache_flush_batch(dev_net(dev)); > >> > > >> > It still has this incorrect conversion in it. > >> > >> Sorry I missed that, what's the exact problem with it? > > > > Because the way _BATCH operation is performed, we call it once... > > > > rollback_registered_many() calls it for the first dev queued in the > > list. > > > > So it should be net independant. > > Thanks Eric. I finally got back to fixing this issue and respinning > the patch. > > Please review, in particular how I handled the RCU bits. > > -------------------- > ipv4: Flush per-ns routing cache more sanely. > > Flush the routing cache only of entries that match the > network namespace in which the purge event occurred. > > Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Seems fine to me, thanks ! Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ipv4: Flush per-ns routing cache more sanely. 2010-12-20 17:13 ` Eric Dumazet @ 2010-12-20 18:36 ` David Miller 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2010-12-20 18:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: eric.dumazet; +Cc: ebiederm, netdev, daniel.lezcano From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:13:53 +0100 > Le dimanche 19 décembre 2010 à 21:14 -0800, David Miller a écrit : >> ipv4: Flush per-ns routing cache more sanely. >> >> Flush the routing cache only of entries that match the >> network namespace in which the purge event occurred. >> >> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> > > > Seems fine to me, thanks ! > > Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Thanks for reviewing. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-12-20 18:35 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2010-10-26 17:34 [PATCH] ipv4: Flush per-ns routing cache more sanely David Miller 2010-10-26 18:57 ` Eric Dumazet 2010-10-26 18:57 ` Daniel Lezcano 2010-10-26 19:05 ` Eric W. Biederman 2010-10-26 19:20 ` David Miller 2010-10-26 19:30 ` Eric Dumazet 2010-10-29 21:41 ` Daniel Lezcano 2010-10-29 22:21 ` David Miller 2010-12-20 5:14 ` David Miller 2010-12-20 17:13 ` Eric Dumazet 2010-12-20 18:36 ` David Miller
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.