All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] Most ARM CPU's have buggy clear_bss?
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 08:14:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CC914D8.4070101@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimP9_Am6PKt8YchW8Mrj8LWujorXs=f+RtfREJ4@mail.gmail.com>

Hello Darius,

Darius Augulis wrote:
> the code for clearing bss section for most ARM cores looks like this
> or very similar:
> 
> clear_bss:
> #ifndef CONFIG_PRELOADER
>         ldr     r0, _bss_start_ofs
>         ldr     r1, _bss_end_ofs
>         ldr     r3, _TEXT_BASE          /* Text base */
>         mov     r4, r7                  /* reloc addr */
>         add     r0, r0, r4
>         add     r1, r1, r4
>         mov     r2, #0x00000000         /* clear                            */
> 
> clbss_l:str     r2, [r0]                /* clear loop...                    */
>         add     r0, r0, #4
>         cmp     r0, r1
>         bne     clbss_l
> #endif  /* #ifndef CONFIG_PRELOADER */
> 
> 
> IMO, if relocation is skipped, r4 should be loaded with value of
> _TEXT_BASE, not reloc address?

Hmm.. I think the question is, is CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT not
obsolete?

> It seems like r3 is prepared for this but, it's somehow missing? It's
> not used at all.

Here  you are right. I think r3 is an artifact from the
GOT relocation. This should be reworked (added Albert Aribaud
to cc, because he did the elf relocation work)

> Maybe it could be reason why I'm facing strange problem, when after
> relocating uboot with nand_spl no one command is not working.
> I debugged that command table is empty. I think this ASM code clears
> not bss area but something else.

If you have defined CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT, yes.
Please remove this define.

> Also relocation code looks a bit strange:
> 
>         .globl  relocate_code
> relocate_code:
>         mov     r4, r0  /* save addr_sp */
>         mov     r5, r1  /* save addr of gd */
>         mov     r6, r2  /* save addr of destination */
>         mov     r7, r2  /* save addr of destination */
> 
>         /* Set up the stack                                                 */
> stack_setup:
>         mov     sp, r4
> 
>         adr     r0, _start
>         ldr     r2, _TEXT_BASE
>         ldr     r3, _bss_start_ofs
>         add     r2, r0, r3              /* r2 <- source end address         */
>         cmp     r0, r6
>         beq     clear_bss
> 
> r0 is compared to r6, which contains reloc address. All instructions
> between loading r0 and comparison are confusing, because they do not
> impact comparison result.
> Also they do not matter in clear_bss so I think would be great to
> change code like this:
> 
>         mov     sp, r4
> 
>         adr     r0, _start
>         cmp     r0, r6
>         beq     clear_bss
>         ldr     r2, _TEXT_BASE
>         ldr     r3, _bss_start_ofs
>         add     r2, r0, r3              /* r2 <- source end address         */
> 
> Any comments are welcome!

Yep, please send a patch for this issue.

bye,
Heiko
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-10-28  6:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-27  7:26 [U-Boot] Most ARM CPU's have buggy clear_bss? Darius Augulis
2010-10-27  8:01 ` Sughosh Ganu
2010-10-27  8:22   ` Darius Augulis
2010-10-27  8:54     ` Sughosh Ganu
2010-10-27  8:58       ` Darius Augulis
2010-10-27  9:09         ` Sughosh Ganu
2010-10-27 10:10           ` Darius Augulis
2010-10-27 10:40             ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-27 10:59               ` Darius Augulis
2010-10-27 11:41                 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-27 15:12 ` Eric Cooper
2010-10-27 18:11   ` Darius Augulis
2010-10-28  5:50     ` Heiko Schocher
2010-10-28  6:09       ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-28  6:17         ` Heiko Schocher
2010-10-28  6:20           ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-28  6:23             ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-28  6:35               ` Heiko Schocher
2010-10-28  6:14 ` Heiko Schocher [this message]
2010-10-28  6:36   ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-28  6:56     ` Darius Augulis
2010-10-28  8:36       ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-28  8:31     ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-28  8:39   ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-28  8:53     ` Heiko Schocher
2010-10-28 10:23     ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-28 11:16       ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-28 11:38         ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-28 11:55           ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-29  9:29           ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-28 11:46         ` [U-Boot] CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT still used? Alexander Holler
2010-10-29  9:32           ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-29 11:32             ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-29 11:43               ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-29 11:48                 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-28  9:03 ` [U-Boot] Most ARM CPU's have buggy clear_bss? Alexander Holler
2010-10-28  9:31   ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-29  8:50     ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-29  9:19       ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-29 11:56         ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-29 12:08           ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-29 12:31             ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-29 13:37               ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-29 13:50                 ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-29 14:04                   ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-29 14:37                 ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-29 14:44                   ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-29 14:50                     ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-29 14:50                   ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-29 14:58                     ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-29 14:54                   ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-29 15:05                     ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-29 15:23                       ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-29 15:32                         ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-29 15:38                           ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-29 16:56                             ` Alexander Holler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CC914D8.4070101@denx.de \
    --to=hs@denx.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.