From: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] Most ARM CPU's have buggy clear_bss?
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 08:14:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CC914D8.4070101@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimP9_Am6PKt8YchW8Mrj8LWujorXs=f+RtfREJ4@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Darius,
Darius Augulis wrote:
> the code for clearing bss section for most ARM cores looks like this
> or very similar:
>
> clear_bss:
> #ifndef CONFIG_PRELOADER
> ldr r0, _bss_start_ofs
> ldr r1, _bss_end_ofs
> ldr r3, _TEXT_BASE /* Text base */
> mov r4, r7 /* reloc addr */
> add r0, r0, r4
> add r1, r1, r4
> mov r2, #0x00000000 /* clear */
>
> clbss_l:str r2, [r0] /* clear loop... */
> add r0, r0, #4
> cmp r0, r1
> bne clbss_l
> #endif /* #ifndef CONFIG_PRELOADER */
>
>
> IMO, if relocation is skipped, r4 should be loaded with value of
> _TEXT_BASE, not reloc address?
Hmm.. I think the question is, is CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT not
obsolete?
> It seems like r3 is prepared for this but, it's somehow missing? It's
> not used at all.
Here you are right. I think r3 is an artifact from the
GOT relocation. This should be reworked (added Albert Aribaud
to cc, because he did the elf relocation work)
> Maybe it could be reason why I'm facing strange problem, when after
> relocating uboot with nand_spl no one command is not working.
> I debugged that command table is empty. I think this ASM code clears
> not bss area but something else.
If you have defined CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT, yes.
Please remove this define.
> Also relocation code looks a bit strange:
>
> .globl relocate_code
> relocate_code:
> mov r4, r0 /* save addr_sp */
> mov r5, r1 /* save addr of gd */
> mov r6, r2 /* save addr of destination */
> mov r7, r2 /* save addr of destination */
>
> /* Set up the stack */
> stack_setup:
> mov sp, r4
>
> adr r0, _start
> ldr r2, _TEXT_BASE
> ldr r3, _bss_start_ofs
> add r2, r0, r3 /* r2 <- source end address */
> cmp r0, r6
> beq clear_bss
>
> r0 is compared to r6, which contains reloc address. All instructions
> between loading r0 and comparison are confusing, because they do not
> impact comparison result.
> Also they do not matter in clear_bss so I think would be great to
> change code like this:
>
> mov sp, r4
>
> adr r0, _start
> cmp r0, r6
> beq clear_bss
> ldr r2, _TEXT_BASE
> ldr r3, _bss_start_ofs
> add r2, r0, r3 /* r2 <- source end address */
>
> Any comments are welcome!
Yep, please send a patch for this issue.
bye,
Heiko
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-28 6:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-27 7:26 [U-Boot] Most ARM CPU's have buggy clear_bss? Darius Augulis
2010-10-27 8:01 ` Sughosh Ganu
2010-10-27 8:22 ` Darius Augulis
2010-10-27 8:54 ` Sughosh Ganu
2010-10-27 8:58 ` Darius Augulis
2010-10-27 9:09 ` Sughosh Ganu
2010-10-27 10:10 ` Darius Augulis
2010-10-27 10:40 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-27 10:59 ` Darius Augulis
2010-10-27 11:41 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-27 15:12 ` Eric Cooper
2010-10-27 18:11 ` Darius Augulis
2010-10-28 5:50 ` Heiko Schocher
2010-10-28 6:09 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-28 6:17 ` Heiko Schocher
2010-10-28 6:20 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-28 6:23 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-28 6:35 ` Heiko Schocher
2010-10-28 6:14 ` Heiko Schocher [this message]
2010-10-28 6:36 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-28 6:56 ` Darius Augulis
2010-10-28 8:36 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-28 8:31 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-28 8:39 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-28 8:53 ` Heiko Schocher
2010-10-28 10:23 ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-28 11:16 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-28 11:38 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-28 11:55 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-29 9:29 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-28 11:46 ` [U-Boot] CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT still used? Alexander Holler
2010-10-29 9:32 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-29 11:32 ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-29 11:43 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-29 11:48 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-28 9:03 ` [U-Boot] Most ARM CPU's have buggy clear_bss? Alexander Holler
2010-10-28 9:31 ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-29 8:50 ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-29 9:19 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-29 11:56 ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-29 12:08 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-29 12:31 ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-29 13:37 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-29 13:50 ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-29 14:04 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-29 14:37 ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-29 14:44 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-29 14:50 ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-29 14:50 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-29 14:58 ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-29 14:54 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-29 15:05 ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-29 15:23 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-29 15:32 ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-29 15:38 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-29 16:56 ` Alexander Holler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CC914D8.4070101@denx.de \
--to=hs@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.