* pty.c: tty_lock() and tty_unlock() in reverse order?
@ 2010-10-29 17:40 Eli Billauer
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Eli Billauer @ 2010-10-29 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hello,
After having some problems with a simple open of /dev/tty taking 30
seconds or so (more precisely, a complete freeze of login console and
very slow ssh), I looked a bit into the kernel code.
My very recently downloaded kernel.org 2.6.36's pty.c goes as below.
What bothers me is that tty_unlock() is called first, and tty_lock()
just before exiting. Shouldn't it be the other way around?
static void pty_close(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file *filp)
{
[snipped some code here, no games with locks]
tty_*un*lock();
tty_vhangup(tty->link);
tty_lock();
}
}
Eli
--
Web: http://www.billauer.co.il
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2010-10-29 17:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-10-29 17:40 pty.c: tty_lock() and tty_unlock() in reverse order? Eli Billauer
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.