All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: Arnd Hannemann <arnd@arndnet.de>
Cc: John W Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	b43-dev@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] b43legacy: Fix compile on ARM architecture
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:02:55 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CDC2FCF.9020902@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CDC2C80.6030807@arndnet.de>

On 11/11/2010 11:48 AM, Arnd Hannemann wrote:
> Am 11.11.2010 18:44, schrieb Larry Finger:
>> From: Arnd Hannemann <arnd@arndnet.de>
>>
>> When b43legacy is compiled on the arm platform, the following errors are seen:
>>
>>   CC [M]  drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy/xmit.o
>> In file included from include/net/dst.h:11,
>> from drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy/xmit.c:31:
>> include/net/dst_ops.h:28: error: expected ':', ',', ';', '}' or '__attribute__'
>>    before '____cacheline_aligned_in_smp'
>> include/net/dst_ops.h: In function 'dst_entries_get_fast':
>> include/net/dst_ops.h:33: error: 'struct dst_ops' has no member named
>>    'pcpuc_entries'
>> include/net/dst_ops.h: In function 'dst_entries_get_slow':
>> include/net/dst_ops.h:41: error: 'struct dst_ops' has no member named
>>    'pcpuc_entries'
>> include/net/dst_ops.h: In function 'dst_entries_add':
>> include/net/dst_ops.h:49: error: 'struct dst_ops' has no member named
>>    'pcpuc_entries'
>> include/net/dst_ops.h: In function 'dst_entries_init':
>> include/net/dst_ops.h:55: error: 'struct dst_ops' has no member named
>>    'pcpuc_entries'
>> include/net/dst_ops.h: In function 'dst_entries_destroy':
>> include/net/dst_ops.h:60: error: 'struct dst_ops' has no member named
>>    'pcpuc_entries'
>> make[4]: *** [drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy/xmit.o] Error 1
>> make[3]: *** [drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy] Error 2
>> make[2]: *** [drivers/net/wireless] Error 2
>> make[1]: *** [drivers/net] Error 2
>> make: *** [drivers] Error 2
>>
>> The cause is a missing include of <linux/cache.h>, which is present for
>> i386 and x86_64 architectures, but not for arm.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Hannemann <arnd@arndnet.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
>> Cc: Stable <stable@kernel.org>
>> ---
>>
>> John,
>>
>> Once I get the ability to cross-compile ARM architecture, I will check to
>> see if the equivalent patch is needed for b43.
> 
> b43 compiles fine for me for the same target.
> 
> Thanks,
> Arnd
> 
>>
>> Larry
>> ---
>>
>> Index: linux-2.6/include/net/dst_ops.h
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/net/dst_ops.h
>> +++ linux-2.6/include/net/dst_ops.h
>> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
>>  #define _NET_DST_OPS_H
>>  #include <linux/types.h>
>>  #include <linux/percpu_counter.h>
>> +#include <linux/cache.h>
>>  
>>  struct dst_entry;
>>  struct kmem_cachep;

After I sent this, it occurs to me that the extra include might be in
b43legacy/xmit.c, not in include/dst_ops.h. Any thoughts and or suggestions? If
that is the case, then b43 would likely break too.

Larry

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: Arnd Hannemann <arnd@arndnet.de>
Cc: John W Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	b43-dev@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] b43legacy: Fix compile on ARM architecture
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:02:55 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CDC2FCF.9020902@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CDC2C80.6030807@arndnet.de>

On 11/11/2010 11:48 AM, Arnd Hannemann wrote:
> Am 11.11.2010 18:44, schrieb Larry Finger:
>> From: Arnd Hannemann <arnd@arndnet.de>
>>
>> When b43legacy is compiled on the arm platform, the following errors are seen:
>>
>>   CC [M]  drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy/xmit.o
>> In file included from include/net/dst.h:11,
>> from drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy/xmit.c:31:
>> include/net/dst_ops.h:28: error: expected ':', ',', ';', '}' or '__attribute__'
>>    before '____cacheline_aligned_in_smp'
>> include/net/dst_ops.h: In function 'dst_entries_get_fast':
>> include/net/dst_ops.h:33: error: 'struct dst_ops' has no member named
>>    'pcpuc_entries'
>> include/net/dst_ops.h: In function 'dst_entries_get_slow':
>> include/net/dst_ops.h:41: error: 'struct dst_ops' has no member named
>>    'pcpuc_entries'
>> include/net/dst_ops.h: In function 'dst_entries_add':
>> include/net/dst_ops.h:49: error: 'struct dst_ops' has no member named
>>    'pcpuc_entries'
>> include/net/dst_ops.h: In function 'dst_entries_init':
>> include/net/dst_ops.h:55: error: 'struct dst_ops' has no member named
>>    'pcpuc_entries'
>> include/net/dst_ops.h: In function 'dst_entries_destroy':
>> include/net/dst_ops.h:60: error: 'struct dst_ops' has no member named
>>    'pcpuc_entries'
>> make[4]: *** [drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy/xmit.o] Error 1
>> make[3]: *** [drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy] Error 2
>> make[2]: *** [drivers/net/wireless] Error 2
>> make[1]: *** [drivers/net] Error 2
>> make: *** [drivers] Error 2
>>
>> The cause is a missing include of <linux/cache.h>, which is present for
>> i386 and x86_64 architectures, but not for arm.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Hannemann <arnd@arndnet.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
>> Cc: Stable <stable@kernel.org>
>> ---
>>
>> John,
>>
>> Once I get the ability to cross-compile ARM architecture, I will check to
>> see if the equivalent patch is needed for b43.
> 
> b43 compiles fine for me for the same target.
> 
> Thanks,
> Arnd
> 
>>
>> Larry
>> ---
>>
>> Index: linux-2.6/include/net/dst_ops.h
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/net/dst_ops.h
>> +++ linux-2.6/include/net/dst_ops.h
>> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
>>  #define _NET_DST_OPS_H
>>  #include <linux/types.h>
>>  #include <linux/percpu_counter.h>
>> +#include <linux/cache.h>
>>  
>>  struct dst_entry;
>>  struct kmem_cachep;

After I sent this, it occurs to me that the extra include might be in
b43legacy/xmit.c, not in include/dst_ops.h. Any thoughts and or suggestions? If
that is the case, then b43 would likely break too.

Larry

  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-11 18:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-11 17:44 [PATCH] b43legacy: Fix compile on ARM architecture Larry Finger
2010-11-11 17:48 ` Arnd Hannemann
2010-11-11 18:02   ` Larry Finger [this message]
2010-11-11 18:02     ` Larry Finger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CDC2FCF.9020902@lwfinger.net \
    --to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=arnd@arndnet.de \
    --cc=b43-dev@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.