From: Trilok Soni <tsoni@codeaurora.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
wruan@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 PATCH 4/6] input: pmic8058_pwrkey: Add support for power key
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:26:28 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CDD013C.6050709@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101112005741.GC17097@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Hi Dmitry,
On 11/12/2010 6:27 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 05:30:21PM +0530, Trilok Soni wrote:
>> Hi Dmitry,
>>
>> On 11/11/2010 12:51 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>>> Hi Trilkok,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 06:17:59PM +0530, Trilok Soni wrote:
>>>> Add support for PMIC8058 power key driven over dedicated KYPD_PWR_N
>>>> pin. It allows the user to specify the amount of time by which the
>>>> power key reporting can be delayed.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Why do we need to delay KEY_POWER reporting? Do we need to use high
>>> resolution timers or regular timers would do as well? KEY_END
>>> appears to be abused (you don't want to move your cursor to the end
>>> of line, do you?). Also I wonder if header file should reside in
>>> linux/mfd with the rest of pmic8058 components.
>>
>> Most of the time Mobile devices come with single physical key for
>> POWER, which if pressed for less than 500ms (configurable) then it
>> will only report KEY_END (which say locks the screen on mobile) and if
>> it pressed more than 500ms then it will also report KEY_POWER event
>> too, which will say display menu on your mobile for asking you to
>> suspend/switch off/etc, operations.
>>
>
> I see,. If you would have used KEY_SCREENLOCK iinstead of KEY_END I
> would likely not ask this question ;)
>
KEY_SCRENNLOCK looks good, let me analyze the impact on userspace framework
which I have. I will come back on this in a day.
>> For the timers I can move from hrtimers to regular timers.
>>
>> For the header file, I can move them to include/linux/mfd too. No
>> problem on that.
>>
>
> I am not even sure we need to keep them in separate header files, but it
> is up to you.
Do you suggest that all the MFD sub-devices's platform data structures should come from single
header file?
---Trilok Soni
--
Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-12 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-10 12:47 [RFC v1 PATCH 0/6] Qualcomm PMIC8058 sub-device drivers Trilok Soni
2010-11-10 12:47 ` [RFC v1 PATCH 1/6] matrix_keypad: Increase the max limit of rows and columns Trilok Soni
2010-11-10 18:33 ` Eric Miao
2010-11-10 18:33 ` Eric Miao
2010-11-10 23:30 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-11-10 23:30 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-11-17 17:54 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-11-10 12:47 ` [RFC v1 PATCH 2/6] input: pm8058_keypad: Qualcomm PMIC8058 keypad controller driver Trilok Soni
2010-11-16 3:49 ` Trilok Soni
2010-11-17 18:02 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-12-06 18:14 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-12-07 9:22 ` Trilok Soni
2010-12-07 9:30 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-12-07 9:32 ` Trilok Soni
2011-01-06 11:56 ` [rtc-linux] " Anirudh Ghayal
2010-11-10 12:47 ` [RFC v1 PATCH 3/6] led: pmic8058: Add PMIC8058 leds driver Trilok Soni
2010-11-10 20:45 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2010-11-10 23:28 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-11-10 23:50 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2010-11-11 12:15 ` Trilok Soni
2010-12-06 13:44 ` Trilok Soni
2010-12-07 15:11 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2010-12-07 15:47 ` Trilok Soni
2010-11-10 12:47 ` [RFC v1 PATCH 4/6] input: pmic8058_pwrkey: Add support for power key Trilok Soni
2010-11-11 7:21 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-11-11 12:00 ` Trilok Soni
2010-11-12 0:57 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-11-12 8:56 ` Trilok Soni [this message]
2010-11-12 19:58 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-11-10 12:48 ` [RFC v1 PATCH 5/6] input: pmic8058-othc: Add support for PM8058 based OTHC Trilok Soni
2010-11-16 3:08 ` Trilok Soni
2010-11-16 5:36 ` Datta, Shubhrajyoti
2010-11-16 6:36 ` Trilok Soni
2010-12-01 5:34 ` Anirudh Ghayal
2010-12-07 10:04 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-12-07 12:10 ` Anirudh Ghayal
2010-11-10 12:48 ` [RFC v1 PATCH 6/6] drivers: rtc: Add support for Qualcomm PMIC8058 RTC Trilok Soni
2010-11-12 8:53 ` Trilok Soni
2010-11-12 12:53 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2010-11-12 15:17 ` [rtc-linux] " Anirudh Ghayal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CDD013C.6050709@codeaurora.org \
--to=tsoni@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=wruan@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.