From: sowani@gmail.com (Atul Sowani)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2.6.36 1/1] kernel SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED changed to __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED()
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 17:28:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CDE7D65.6060203@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CD823DC.8030201@gmail.com>
Atul Sowani wrote:
> There are still some files containing .lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED type
> assignments which should be converted to __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED().
>
> Signed-off-by: Atul Sowani <sowani@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> diff -uprN a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c 2010-10-21 02:00:22.000000000 +0530
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c 2010-11-07 00:47:32.000000000 +0530
> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ struct ipi_data {
> };
>
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct ipi_data, ipi_data) = {
> - .lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED,
> + .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED (ipi_data.lock),
> };
>
> enum ipi_msg_type {
> diff -uprN a/arch/mips/kernel/vpe.c b/arch/mips/kernel/vpe.c
> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/vpe.c 2010-10-21 02:00:22.000000000 +0530
> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/vpe.c 2010-11-07 00:51:37.000000000 +0530
> @@ -148,9 +148,9 @@ struct {
> spinlock_t tc_list_lock;
> struct list_head tc_list; /* Thread contexts */
> } vpecontrol = {
> - .vpe_list_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED,
> + .vpe_list_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(vpecontrol.vpe_list_lock),
> .vpe_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(vpecontrol.vpe_list),
> - .tc_list_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED,
> + .tc_list_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(vpecontrol.tc_list_lock),
> .tc_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(vpecontrol.tc_list)
> };
> diff -uprN a/kernel/cred.c b/kernel/cred.c
> --- a/kernel/cred.c 2010-10-21 02:00:22.000000000 +0530
> +++ b/kernel/cred.c 2010-11-07 00:52:22.000000000 +0530
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static struct kmem_cache *cred_jar;
> static struct thread_group_cred init_tgcred = {
> .usage = ATOMIC_INIT(2),
> .tgid = 0,
> - .lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED,
> + .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(init_tgcred.lock),
> };
> #endif
>
Hi all,
I made original patch submission on 08.Nov.2010. I am wondering if
this patch will be useful and is correct. Please comment.
Best regards,
Atul.
--
Atul Sowani (sowani at gmail.com)
http://savannah.gnu.org/users/atul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Atul Sowani <sowani@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ralf@linux-mips.org, rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, alan@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.36 1/1] kernel SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED changed to __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED()
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 17:28:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CDE7D65.6060203@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CD823DC.8030201@gmail.com>
Atul Sowani wrote:
> There are still some files containing .lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED type
> assignments which should be converted to __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED().
>
> Signed-off-by: Atul Sowani <sowani@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> diff -uprN a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c 2010-10-21 02:00:22.000000000 +0530
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c 2010-11-07 00:47:32.000000000 +0530
> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ struct ipi_data {
> };
>
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct ipi_data, ipi_data) = {
> - .lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED,
> + .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED (ipi_data.lock),
> };
>
> enum ipi_msg_type {
> diff -uprN a/arch/mips/kernel/vpe.c b/arch/mips/kernel/vpe.c
> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/vpe.c 2010-10-21 02:00:22.000000000 +0530
> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/vpe.c 2010-11-07 00:51:37.000000000 +0530
> @@ -148,9 +148,9 @@ struct {
> spinlock_t tc_list_lock;
> struct list_head tc_list; /* Thread contexts */
> } vpecontrol = {
> - .vpe_list_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED,
> + .vpe_list_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(vpecontrol.vpe_list_lock),
> .vpe_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(vpecontrol.vpe_list),
> - .tc_list_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED,
> + .tc_list_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(vpecontrol.tc_list_lock),
> .tc_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(vpecontrol.tc_list)
> };
> diff -uprN a/kernel/cred.c b/kernel/cred.c
> --- a/kernel/cred.c 2010-10-21 02:00:22.000000000 +0530
> +++ b/kernel/cred.c 2010-11-07 00:52:22.000000000 +0530
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static struct kmem_cache *cred_jar;
> static struct thread_group_cred init_tgcred = {
> .usage = ATOMIC_INIT(2),
> .tgid = 0,
> - .lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED,
> + .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(init_tgcred.lock),
> };
> #endif
>
Hi all,
I made original patch submission on 08.Nov.2010. I am wondering if
this patch will be useful and is correct. Please comment.
Best regards,
Atul.
--
Atul Sowani (sowani@gmail.com)
http://savannah.gnu.org/users/atul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-13 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-08 16:22 [PATCH 2.6.36 1/1] kernel SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED changed to __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED() Atul Sowani
2010-11-13 11:58 ` Atul Sowani [this message]
2010-11-13 11:58 ` Atul Sowani
2010-11-13 13:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-13 13:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CDE7D65.6060203@gmail.com \
--to=sowani@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.