All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] mm: remove gfp mask from pcpu_get_vm_areas
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 07:29:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CE4C7E4.50402@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1011171229040.30790@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

Hello,

On 11/17/2010 09:32 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
> A recent thread[*] shows a problem whereas gfp masks may be passed into 
> the vmalloc interface that restrict reclaim behavior, yet the underlying 
> pte allocator unconditionally uses GFP_KERNEL.  This is a first-pass at an 
> effort to remove all gfp_t formals from the vmalloc interface (and can be 
> completed once gfs2, ntfs, and ceph have converted) and require them to 
> use GFP_KERNEL.

I see.

> Luckily for the per-cpu allocator, this was trivial since that happens to 
> be the only use case already.

per-cpu allocator intentionally only allowed GFP_KERNEL till now.
There were some requests about allowing GFP_ATOMIC allocations and
that's the reason why the @gfp is there for the vm function.  Anyways,
this looks like the nail in that coffin.

 Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-18  6:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-17  3:41 [patch 1/3] mm: remove unused get_vm_area_node David Rientjes
2010-11-17  3:41 ` [patch 2/3] mm: remove gfp mask from pcpu_get_vm_areas David Rientjes
2010-11-17  9:08   ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-17 20:32     ` David Rientjes
2010-11-18  6:29       ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-11-17  3:41 ` [patch 3/3] mm: unify module_alloc code for vmalloc David Rientjes
2010-11-17  3:41   ` David Rientjes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CE4C7E4.50402@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.