All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Mitch Bradley <wmb@firmworks.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, sodaville@linutronix.de,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [sodaville] [PATCH 03/11] x86/dtb: Add a device tree for CE4100
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:44:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CF402AD.2060000@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CF30327.9020408@firmworks.com>

Mitch Bradley wrote:
> On 11/28/2010 12:53 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>>> I wasn't aware of the OFW binding for X86. I will follow it once I find
>>> it.
>> Interesting, I though I would find it on
>> http://www.openfirmware.info/Bindings but it's not there...
>> CC'ing Mitch who might know where to find that.
> 
> I'd be happy to work with people to develop a new x86 binding.

So for the CPU node I have so far:

         cpus {
                  #address-cells = <1>;
                  #size-cells = <0>;

                  cpu@0 {
                          device_type = "cpu";
			 compatible = "Intel,CE4100";
                          reg = <0>;
                          lapic = <&lapic0>;
                  };
          };

This one should match ePARP 1.0. David mentioned threads. I have just one.
No HyperThreading, nothing special. Should I just leave it as it or go
for:
         cpus {
                  #address-cells = <1>;
                  #size-cells = <0>;

                  cpu@0 {
                          device_type = "cpu";
			 compatible = "Intel,CE4100";	
			 reg = <0>;
                	         lapic = <&lapic0>;

			thread@0 {
         	                 reg = <0>;
                  	};
		};
          };
?

Sebastian

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Mitch Bradley <wmb-D5eQfiDGL7eakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
	x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	sodaville-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [sodaville] [PATCH 03/11] x86/dtb: Add a device tree for CE4100
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:44:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CF402AD.2060000@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CF30327.9020408-D5eQfiDGL7eakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>

Mitch Bradley wrote:
> On 11/28/2010 12:53 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>>> I wasn't aware of the OFW binding for X86. I will follow it once I find
>>> it.
>> Interesting, I though I would find it on
>> http://www.openfirmware.info/Bindings but it's not there...
>> CC'ing Mitch who might know where to find that.
> 
> I'd be happy to work with people to develop a new x86 binding.

So for the CPU node I have so far:

         cpus {
                  #address-cells = <1>;
                  #size-cells = <0>;

                  cpu@0 {
                          device_type = "cpu";
			 compatible = "Intel,CE4100";
                          reg = <0>;
                          lapic = <&lapic0>;
                  };
          };

This one should match ePARP 1.0. David mentioned threads. I have just one.
No HyperThreading, nothing special. Should I just leave it as it or go
for:
         cpus {
                  #address-cells = <1>;
                  #size-cells = <0>;

                  cpu@0 {
                          device_type = "cpu";
			 compatible = "Intel,CE4100";	
			 reg = <0>;
                	         lapic = <&lapic0>;

			thread@0 {
         	                 reg = <0>;
                  	};
		};
          };
?

Sebastian

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-11-29 19:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 111+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-25 17:39 Add device tree support for x86 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-25 17:39 ` [PATCH 01/11] x86/kernel: remove conditional early remap in parse_e820_ext Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-12-08  8:38   ` [sodaville] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-12-08 14:15     ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-15 23:28   ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-16  9:55     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-25 17:39 ` [PATCH 02/11] x86: Add device tree support Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-25 17:39   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-25 22:53   ` Sam Ravnborg
2010-11-25 22:53     ` Sam Ravnborg
2010-11-26  9:06     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-26  9:06       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-26 21:42   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-11-26 21:42     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-11-28 13:49     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-28 13:49       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-28 22:28       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-11-28 22:28         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-12-30  8:26       ` Grant Likely
2010-12-30  8:26         ` Grant Likely
2010-12-30  8:45         ` Rob Landley
2010-12-30 20:58           ` Grant Likely
2010-12-30 20:58             ` Grant Likely
2011-01-03 16:05             ` [sodaville] " H. Peter Anvin
2011-01-03 16:19               ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-01-03 17:52                 ` Grant Likely
2011-01-03 17:52                   ` Grant Likely
2011-01-03 18:06                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-01-03 18:10                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-01-03 18:10                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-30 20:57         ` Grant Likely
2010-12-30 20:57           ` Grant Likely
2010-12-31  0:51         ` [sodaville] " H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-31  0:51           ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-11-25 17:39 ` [PATCH 03/11] x86/dtb: Add a device tree for CE4100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-25 17:39   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-26 21:57   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-11-26 21:57     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-11-28 16:04     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-28 16:04       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-28 22:53       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-11-28 22:53         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-11-29  1:34         ` Mitch Bradley
2010-11-29 18:26           ` [sodaville] " H. Peter Anvin
2010-11-29 20:03             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-11-29 19:44           ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2010-11-29 19:44             ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-12-02  0:40             ` David Gibson
2010-12-02  0:40               ` David Gibson
2010-11-29 19:07         ` Scott Wood
2010-11-29 19:07           ` Scott Wood
2010-11-29 20:05           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-11-29 20:32             ` Mitch Bradley
2010-11-29 20:44               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-11-29 20:44                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-11-29 21:32                 ` Mitch Bradley
2010-11-29 21:32                   ` Mitch Bradley
2010-11-29 23:47                 ` Alan Cox
2010-11-30  2:50                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-11-30  2:50                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-11-30 11:20                     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-30 11:20                       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-29 23:42               ` Alan Cox
2010-11-30 21:18                 ` [sodaville] " H. Peter Anvin
2010-11-30 11:51               ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-30 11:51                 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-30 20:31                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-11-30 20:31                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-11-29 23:58           ` David Gibson
2010-11-29 23:58             ` David Gibson
2010-11-29 19:36         ` [sodaville] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-29 20:14           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-11-29  2:22     ` David Gibson
2010-11-29  2:22       ` David Gibson
2010-11-25 17:39 ` [PATCH 04/11] x86/dtb: add irq host abstraction Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-25 17:39   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-25 19:30   ` Jon Loeliger
2010-11-26 14:19     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-26 14:19       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-26 21:36       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-11-26 21:36         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-12-01 10:31         ` [sodaville] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-12-01 10:31           ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-27  3:11       ` Jon Loeliger
2010-11-27  3:11         ` Jon Loeliger
2010-11-25 17:39 ` [PATCH 05/11] x86/dtb: add early parsing of APIC and IO APIC Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-25 17:39   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-25 17:39 ` [PATCH 06/11] x86/dtb: add support hpet Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-25 17:39   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-25 17:39 ` [PATCH 07/11] x86/dtb: add support for PCI devices backed by dtb nodes Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-25 17:39   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-27 22:33   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-11-27 22:33     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-11-28 14:04     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-28 14:04       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-28 22:32       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-11-28 22:32         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-12-02 16:17         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-12-02 16:17           ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-25 17:39 ` [PATCH 08/11] x86/dtb: Add generic bus probe Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-25 17:39   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-25 17:39 ` [PATCH 09/11] x86/ioapic: Add OF bindings for IO-APIC Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-25 17:39   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-25 17:40 ` [PATCH 10/11] x86/io_apic: add simply id set Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-25 21:04   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-11-26 11:03     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-11-26 16:50     ` [PATCH] x86/io_apic: split setup_ioapic_ids_from_mpc() into a non-checkign version Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-12-06 13:33       ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: io_apic: Split setup_ioapic_ids_from_mpc() tip-bot for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-12-07  8:59         ` [PATCH -v2] x86, ioapic: Don't write io_apic ID if it is not changed Yinghai Lu
2010-12-09 20:56           ` [tip:x86/apic-cleanups] x86, ioapic: Avoid writing io_apic id if already correct tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2010-11-25 17:40 ` [PATCH 11/11] x86/ce4100: use OF for ioapic Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CF402AD.2060000@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sodaville@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wmb@firmworks.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.