* Re: [beagleboard] Yocto [not found] ` <20101203184643.GW10755@ibawizard.net> @ 2010-12-03 19:11 ` Xianghua Xiao 2010-12-03 19:15 ` Bruce Ashfield 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Xianghua Xiao @ 2010-12-03 19:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: beagleboard; +Cc: yocto On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Petr Štetiar <ynezz@true.cz> wrote: > Michael J. Hammel <mjhammel@graphics-muse.org> [2010-12-03 11:01:27]: > > Hi, > >> I've heard of Yocto only in passing. I'm assuming it's another >> bitbake-based metabuild system? Is there some reasoning why >> Meego/Linaro/OpenEmbedded/Angstrom/Custom Builds cannot fill the >> requirements of Yocto? I don't mean that harshly at all - I'm just >> curious about the evolution and true target audiences of these projects. >> It's nice to have choices, but developers should have some idea of the >> differences so they can choose wisely when just starting. > > Richard wrote nice summary[1], it's worth reading and it might answer your > questions as well :-) > > 1. http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2010-November/026598.html > > -- ynezz > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Beagle Board" group. > To post to this group, send email to beagleboard@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to beagleboard+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/beagleboard?hl=en. > > May we know roughly how many paid resources are behind Yocto? Which arch will be first officially supported? Will it be ATOM as Poky is really part of Intel? Beagle/ARM will be done by the community instead? Thanks, Xianghua ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [beagleboard] Yocto 2010-12-03 19:11 ` [beagleboard] Yocto Xianghua Xiao @ 2010-12-03 19:15 ` Bruce Ashfield 2010-12-03 19:34 ` Xianghua Xiao 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2010-12-03 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Xianghua Xiao; +Cc: yocto, beagleboard On 10-12-03 02:11 PM, Xianghua Xiao wrote: > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Petr Štetiar<ynezz@true.cz> wrote: >> Michael J. Hammel<mjhammel@graphics-muse.org> [2010-12-03 11:01:27]: >> >> Hi, >> >>> I've heard of Yocto only in passing. I'm assuming it's another >>> bitbake-based metabuild system? Is there some reasoning why >>> Meego/Linaro/OpenEmbedded/Angstrom/Custom Builds cannot fill the >>> requirements of Yocto? I don't mean that harshly at all - I'm just >>> curious about the evolution and true target audiences of these projects. >>> It's nice to have choices, but developers should have some idea of the >>> differences so they can choose wisely when just starting. >> >> Richard wrote nice summary[1], it's worth reading and it might answer your >> questions as well :-) >> >> 1. http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2010-November/026598.html >> >> -- ynezz >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Beagle Board" group. >> To post to this group, send email to beagleboard@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to beagleboard+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/beagleboard?hl=en. >> >> > > May we know roughly how many paid resources are behind Yocto? > > Which arch will be first officially supported? Will it be ATOM as Poky > is really part of Intel? Beagle/ARM will be done by the community > instead? I can provide some answers for this part of the query. In the 0.9 release, we already support the following arches: - x86(64), mips, arm and powerpc These are all based on a 2.6.34 kernel base (with an option for 2.6.37-rcX shortly). There are simulated targets for each arch, and a hardware reference for each as well (for ARM the reference hardware is the beagleboard). Hope that helps, Bruce > > Thanks, > Xianghua > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [beagleboard] Yocto 2010-12-03 19:15 ` Bruce Ashfield @ 2010-12-03 19:34 ` Xianghua Xiao 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Xianghua Xiao @ 2010-12-03 19:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: yocto, beagleboard On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> wrote: > On 10-12-03 02:11 PM, Xianghua Xiao wrote: >> >> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Petr Štetiar<ynezz@true.cz> wrote: >>> >>> Michael J. Hammel<mjhammel@graphics-muse.org> [2010-12-03 11:01:27]: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>>> I've heard of Yocto only in passing. I'm assuming it's another >>>> bitbake-based metabuild system? Is there some reasoning why >>>> Meego/Linaro/OpenEmbedded/Angstrom/Custom Builds cannot fill the >>>> requirements of Yocto? I don't mean that harshly at all - I'm just >>>> curious about the evolution and true target audiences of these projects. >>>> It's nice to have choices, but developers should have some idea of the >>>> differences so they can choose wisely when just starting. >>> >>> Richard wrote nice summary[1], it's worth reading and it might answer >>> your >>> questions as well :-) >>> >>> 1. >>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2010-November/026598.html >>> >>> -- ynezz >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Beagle Board" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to beagleboard@googlegroups.com. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> beagleboard+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/beagleboard?hl=en. >>> >>> >> >> May we know roughly how many paid resources are behind Yocto? >> >> Which arch will be first officially supported? Will it be ATOM as Poky >> is really part of Intel? Beagle/ARM will be done by the community >> instead? > > I can provide some answers for this part of the query. > > In the 0.9 release, we already support the following arches: > > - x86(64), mips, arm and powerpc > > These are all based on a 2.6.34 kernel base (with an option > for 2.6.37-rcX shortly). There are simulated targets for > each arch, and a hardware reference for each as well > (for ARM the reference hardware is the beagleboard). > > Hope that helps, > > Bruce > >> >> Thanks, >> Xianghua >> _______________________________________________ >> yocto mailing list >> yocto@yoctoproject.org >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > > Will try it on my beagle. I failed to find info on other hardware reference platform. And I found 0.9 has an ATOM download as well(http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/downloads/yocto-0.9/). Additionally, http://autobuilder.pokylinux.org:8010/ is not working. Thanks, Xianghua ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-12-03 19:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <8A929EC0-8AF1-48BB-ACD4-9D38C8F72DCD@jonmasters.org>
[not found] ` <1291399287.16321.18.camel@feynman.coloradoengineeringinc.com>
[not found] ` <20101203184643.GW10755@ibawizard.net>
2010-12-03 19:11 ` [beagleboard] Yocto Xianghua Xiao
2010-12-03 19:15 ` Bruce Ashfield
2010-12-03 19:34 ` Xianghua Xiao
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.