All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* xtables/geoip vs ipset
@ 2010-12-09 23:14 Mr Dash Four
  2010-12-10  0:03 ` Jan Engelhardt
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mr Dash Four @ 2010-12-09 23:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'netfilter@vger.kernel.org'

Currently I am employing a large number of ipsets (about 30k+ subnets in 
total) which hold IP subnets fetched from whatever the latest version of 
the geoip database I have sourced and compiled.

I am aware that xtables also have the geoip target, though was wandering 
what the performance is like compared to having the same IP subnets 
loaded with ipset. Has anyone tested/compared these two matching methods?

I know the performance of iptables when it deals with large number of ip 
addresses is absolutely abysmal, so never tried to use the geoip target, 
so just wanted to see if that has changed?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-12-10 13:13 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-12-09 23:14 xtables/geoip vs ipset Mr Dash Four
2010-12-10  0:03 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-12-10 13:13   ` Mr Dash Four

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.