From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Tom Lyon <pugs@cisco.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] genirq: Inform handler about line sharing state
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:00:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D07F70A.30209@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1012142147420.12146@localhost6.localdomain6>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1766 bytes --]
Am 14.12.2010 21:54, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> @@ -943,6 +950,9 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id)
>> /* Make sure it's not being used on another CPU: */
>> synchronize_irq(irq);
>>
>> + if (single_handler)
>> + desc->irq_data.drv_status &= ~IRQS_SHARED;
>> +
>
> What's the reason to clear this flag outside of the desc->lock held
> region.
We need to synchronize the irq first before clearing the flag.
The problematic scenario behind this: An IRQ started in shared mode,
this the line was unmasked after the hardirq. Now we clear IRQS_SHARED
before calling into the threaded handler. And that handler may now think
that the line is still masked as IRQS_SHARED is set.
> I need this status for other purposes as well, where I
> definitely need serialization.
Well, two options: wrap all bit manipulations with desc->lock
acquisition/release or turn drv_status into an atomic. I don't know what
your plans with drv_status are, so...
>
>> + mutex_lock(®ister_lock);
>> +
>> + old_action = desc->action;
>> + if (old_action && (old_action->flags & IRQF_ADAPTIVE) &&
>> + !(desc->irq_data.drv_status & IRQS_SHARED)) {
>> + /*
>> + * Signal the old handler that is has to switch to shareable
>> + * handling mode. Disable the line to avoid any conflict with
>> + * a real IRQ.
>> + */
>> + disable_irq(irq);
>> + local_irq_disable();
>> +
>> + desc->irq_data.drv_status |= IRQS_SHARED | IRQS_MAKE_SHAREABLE;
>
> Unserialized access as well. Will think about it.
>
>> + old_action->handler(irq, old_action->dev_id);
>> + desc->irq_data.drv_status &= ~IRQS_MAKE_SHAREABLE;
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
Jan
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 259 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-14 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-13 22:59 [PATCH v3 0/4] KVM & genirq: Enable adaptive IRQ sharing for passed-through devices Jan Kiszka
2010-12-13 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] genirq: Introduce driver-readable IRQ status word Jan Kiszka
2010-12-14 20:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-14 23:10 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-12-13 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] genirq: Inform handler about line sharing state Jan Kiszka
2010-12-14 20:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-14 23:00 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2010-12-15 13:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-15 14:18 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-12-15 14:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-15 15:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-15 15:49 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-12-15 16:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-14 21:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-14 23:01 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-12-15 8:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-15 9:37 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-12-15 9:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-16 13:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-16 20:26 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-12-16 21:28 ` change of email address: pugs@cisco.com -> pugs@ieee.org Tom Lyon
2010-12-17 8:18 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] genirq: Inform handler about line sharing state Jan Kiszka
2010-12-17 10:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-17 10:31 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-12-17 10:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-17 10:48 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-12-17 15:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-17 16:06 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-12-17 16:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-18 18:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-12-13 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] genirq: Add support for IRQF_COND_ONESHOT Jan Kiszka
2010-12-13 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] KVM: Allow host IRQ sharing for passed-through PCI 2.3 devices Jan Kiszka
2010-12-14 8:53 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] KVM & genirq: Enable adaptive IRQ sharing for passed-through devices Avi Kivity
2010-12-14 22:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D07F70A.30209@web.de \
--to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pugs@cisco.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.