[PATCH] sanity: release 2010.12 is out, so bump minimum bitbake to 1.10.0 per TSC decision

[PATCH] sanity: release 2010.12 is out, so bump minimum bitbake to 1.10.0 per TSC decision

[Koen Kooi]

Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <koen@openembedded.org>
---
 conf/sanity.conf |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/conf/sanity.conf b/conf/sanity.conf
index 0f53cb2..1c83c14 100644
--- a/conf/sanity.conf
+++ b/conf/sanity.conf
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 # See sanity.bbclass
 #
 # Expert users can confirm their sanity with "touch conf/sanity.conf"
-BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.8.18"
+BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.10.0"
 
 SANITY_ABIFILE = "${TMPDIR}/abi_version"
 SANITY_PRFILE = "${TMPDIR}/distro_pr"
-- 
1.7.0

Re: [PATCH] sanity: release 2010.12 is out, so bump minimum bitbake to 1.10.0 per TSC decision

[Frans Meulenbroeks]

2010/12/22 Koen Kooi <koen.kooi@gmail.com>:
> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <koen@openembedded.org>
> ---
>  conf/sanity.conf |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/conf/sanity.conf b/conf/sanity.conf
> index 0f53cb2..1c83c14 100644
> --- a/conf/sanity.conf
> +++ b/conf/sanity.conf
> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>  # See sanity.bbclass
>  #
>  # Expert users can confirm their sanity with "touch conf/sanity.conf"
> -BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.8.18"
> +BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.10.0"
>
>  SANITY_ABIFILE = "${TMPDIR}/abi_version"
>  SANITY_PRFILE = "${TMPDIR}/distro_pr"
> --
> 1.7.0
>

As 1.10.1 is already out for quite a while and (if I recall correctly)
1.10.0 had some issues that are resolved in 1.10.1 wouldn't it be
better to set 1.10.1 as minimal version?
Otherwise no objections.

Frans.

Re: [PATCH] sanity: release 2010.12 is out, so bump minimum bitbake to 1.10.0 per TSC decision

[Koen Kooi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 22-12-10 12:55, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> 2010/12/22 Koen Kooi <koen.kooi@gmail.com>:
>> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <koen@openembedded.org>
>> ---
>>  conf/sanity.conf |    2 +-
>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/conf/sanity.conf b/conf/sanity.conf
>> index 0f53cb2..1c83c14 100644
>> --- a/conf/sanity.conf
>> +++ b/conf/sanity.conf
>> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>>  # See sanity.bbclass
>>  #
>>  # Expert users can confirm their sanity with "touch conf/sanity.conf"
>> -BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.8.18"
>> +BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.10.0"
>>
>>  SANITY_ABIFILE = "${TMPDIR}/abi_version"
>>  SANITY_PRFILE = "${TMPDIR}/distro_pr"
>> --
>> 1.7.0
>>
> 
> As 1.10.1 is already out for quite a while and (if I recall correctly)
> 1.10.0 had some issues that are resolved in 1.10.1 wouldn't it be
> better to set 1.10.1 as minimal version?
> Otherwise no objections.

The head of the 1.10 branch says it's 1.10.0, not 1.10.1 :(
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFNEfChMkyGM64RGpERAjTTAJ47BDNBOadAEiwU/oIr8gHxS3GUvQCgrbRS
ov7MdQlOGRcHPL2sh5u0k0Y=
=J58j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [PATCH] sanity: release 2010.12 is out, so bump minimum bitbake to 1.10.0 per TSC decision

[Frans Meulenbroeks]

2010/12/22 Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 22-12-10 12:55, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
>> 2010/12/22 Koen Kooi <koen.kooi@gmail.com>:
>>> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <koen@openembedded.org>
>>> ---
>>>  conf/sanity.conf |    2 +-
>>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/conf/sanity.conf b/conf/sanity.conf
>>> index 0f53cb2..1c83c14 100644
>>> --- a/conf/sanity.conf
>>> +++ b/conf/sanity.conf
>>> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>>>  # See sanity.bbclass
>>>  #
>>>  # Expert users can confirm their sanity with "touch conf/sanity.conf"
>>> -BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.8.18"
>>> +BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.10.0"
>>>
>>>  SANITY_ABIFILE = "${TMPDIR}/abi_version"
>>>  SANITY_PRFILE = "${TMPDIR}/distro_pr"
>>> --
>>> 1.7.0
>>>
>>
>> As 1.10.1 is already out for quite a while and (if I recall correctly)
>> 1.10.0 had some issues that are resolved in 1.10.1 wouldn't it be
>> better to set 1.10.1 as minimal version?
>> Otherwise no objections.
>
> The head of the 1.10 branch says it's 1.10.0, not 1.10.1 :(

Indeed :-(
Guess this should be changed then

There is http://developer.berlios.de/projects/bitbake/ which lists 1.10.1
and the git also has a tag for 1.10.1 and a donwload for it.

Btw I assume we also need to update the wiki

Frans

Re: [PATCH] sanity: release 2010.12 is out, so bump minimum bitbake to 1.10.0 per TSC decision

[Tom Rini]

On 12/22/2010 05:48 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> 2010/12/22 Koen Kooi<k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 22-12-10 12:55, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
>>> 2010/12/22 Koen Kooi<koen.kooi@gmail.com>:
>>>> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi<koen@openembedded.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>   conf/sanity.conf |    2 +-
>>>>   1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/conf/sanity.conf b/conf/sanity.conf
>>>> index 0f53cb2..1c83c14 100644
>>>> --- a/conf/sanity.conf
>>>> +++ b/conf/sanity.conf
>>>> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>>>>   # See sanity.bbclass
>>>>   #
>>>>   # Expert users can confirm their sanity with "touch conf/sanity.conf"
>>>> -BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.8.18"
>>>> +BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.10.0"
>>>>
>>>>   SANITY_ABIFILE = "${TMPDIR}/abi_version"
>>>>   SANITY_PRFILE = "${TMPDIR}/distro_pr"
>>>> --
>>>> 1.7.0
>>>>
>>>
>>> As 1.10.1 is already out for quite a while and (if I recall correctly)
>>> 1.10.0 had some issues that are resolved in 1.10.1 wouldn't it be
>>> better to set 1.10.1 as minimal version?
>>> Otherwise no objections.
>>
>> The head of the 1.10 branch says it's 1.10.0, not 1.10.1 :(
>
> Indeed :-(
> Guess this should be changed then
>
> There is http://developer.berlios.de/projects/bitbake/ which lists 1.10.1
> and the git also has a tag for 1.10.1 and a donwload for it.
>
> Btw I assume we also need to update the wiki

I think what happened was Chris forgot to bump the version number when 
tagging / etc.  As he plans to do a 1.10.2 soon, maybe we can wait for 
that?  And maybe we can get that done this week?

-- 
Tom Rini
Mentor Graphics Corporation

Re: [PATCH] sanity: release 2010.12 is out, so bump minimum bitbake to 1.10.0 per TSC decision

[Koen Kooi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 22-12-10 16:45, Tom Rini wrote:
> On 12/22/2010 05:48 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
>> 2010/12/22 Koen Kooi<k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On 22-12-10 12:55, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
>>>> 2010/12/22 Koen Kooi<koen.kooi@gmail.com>:
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi<koen@openembedded.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   conf/sanity.conf |    2 +-
>>>>>   1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/conf/sanity.conf b/conf/sanity.conf
>>>>> index 0f53cb2..1c83c14 100644
>>>>> --- a/conf/sanity.conf
>>>>> +++ b/conf/sanity.conf
>>>>> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>>>>>   # See sanity.bbclass
>>>>>   #
>>>>>   # Expert users can confirm their sanity with "touch
>>>>> conf/sanity.conf"
>>>>> -BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.8.18"
>>>>> +BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.10.0"
>>>>>
>>>>>   SANITY_ABIFILE = "${TMPDIR}/abi_version"
>>>>>   SANITY_PRFILE = "${TMPDIR}/distro_pr"
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> 1.7.0
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As 1.10.1 is already out for quite a while and (if I recall correctly)
>>>> 1.10.0 had some issues that are resolved in 1.10.1 wouldn't it be
>>>> better to set 1.10.1 as minimal version?
>>>> Otherwise no objections.
>>>
>>> The head of the 1.10 branch says it's 1.10.0, not 1.10.1 :(
>>
>> Indeed :-(
>> Guess this should be changed then
>>
>> There is http://developer.berlios.de/projects/bitbake/ which lists 1.10.1
>> and the git also has a tag for 1.10.1 and a donwload for it.
>>
>> Btw I assume we also need to update the wiki
> 
> I think what happened was Chris forgot to bump the version number when
> tagging / etc.  As he plans to do a 1.10.2 soon, maybe we can wait for
> that?  And maybe we can get that done this week?

I really want the 1.10 in sooner than later, since at OEDEM we agreed to
do it before the release, but the TSC disagreed for undisclosed reasons.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFNEh7BMkyGM64RGpERAq2CAKCU9ozyZchRMe2PCzF6gA2mM3hEXQCfYubv
eOxFfH6IOkk2jGe6QbMaT8I=
=DVUe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [PATCH] sanity: release 2010.12 is out, so bump minimum bitbake to 1.10.0 per TSC decision

[Tom Rini]

On 12/22/2010 08:52 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 22-12-10 16:45, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On 12/22/2010 05:48 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
>>> 2010/12/22 Koen Kooi<k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>:
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>> On 22-12-10 12:55, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
>>>>> 2010/12/22 Koen Kooi<koen.kooi@gmail.com>:
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi<koen@openembedded.org>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>    conf/sanity.conf |    2 +-
>>>>>>    1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/conf/sanity.conf b/conf/sanity.conf
>>>>>> index 0f53cb2..1c83c14 100644
>>>>>> --- a/conf/sanity.conf
>>>>>> +++ b/conf/sanity.conf
>>>>>> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>>>>>>    # See sanity.bbclass
>>>>>>    #
>>>>>>    # Expert users can confirm their sanity with "touch
>>>>>> conf/sanity.conf"
>>>>>> -BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.8.18"
>>>>>> +BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.10.0"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    SANITY_ABIFILE = "${TMPDIR}/abi_version"
>>>>>>    SANITY_PRFILE = "${TMPDIR}/distro_pr"
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 1.7.0
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> As 1.10.1 is already out for quite a while and (if I recall correctly)
>>>>> 1.10.0 had some issues that are resolved in 1.10.1 wouldn't it be
>>>>> better to set 1.10.1 as minimal version?
>>>>> Otherwise no objections.
>>>>
>>>> The head of the 1.10 branch says it's 1.10.0, not 1.10.1 :(
>>>
>>> Indeed :-(
>>> Guess this should be changed then
>>>
>>> There is http://developer.berlios.de/projects/bitbake/ which lists 1.10.1
>>> and the git also has a tag for 1.10.1 and a donwload for it.
>>>
>>> Btw I assume we also need to update the wiki
>>
>> I think what happened was Chris forgot to bump the version number when
>> tagging / etc.  As he plans to do a 1.10.2 soon, maybe we can wait for
>> that?  And maybe we can get that done this week?
>
> I really want the 1.10 in sooner than later, since at OEDEM we agreed to
> do it before the release, but the TSC disagreed for undisclosed reasons.

I agree and would like it done soon too (well, I'd almost rather see 
1.11 be required, yaaay parallel parsing) but since we can't tell 1.10.0 
from .1 and I don't think this week (since that's just a few more days) 
is too bad.  Chris, when can you do a 1.10.2?

-- 
Tom Rini
Mentor Graphics Corporation

Re: [PATCH] sanity: release 2010.12 is out, so bump minimum bitbake to 1.10.0 per TSC decision

[Chris Larson]

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Tom Rini <tom_rini@mentor.com> wrote:
> I agree and would like it done soon too (well, I'd almost rather see 1.11 be
> required, yaaay parallel parsing) but since we can't tell 1.10.0 from .1 and
> I don't think this week (since that's just a few more days) is too bad.
>  Chris, when can you do a 1.10.2?

I might be able to get to it today.  We really need to make the
process more automated.  We should also stop using berlios for bitbake
release tarballs and just rely on the oe site / freshmeat / cgit, imo.
-- 
Christopher Larson
clarson at kergoth dot com
Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus
Maintainer - Tslib
Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics

Re: [PATCH] sanity: release 2010.12 is out, so bump minimum bitbake to 1.10.0 per TSC decision

[Khem Raj]

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Chris Larson <clarson@kergoth.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Tom Rini <tom_rini@mentor.com> wrote:
>> I agree and would like it done soon too (well, I'd almost rather see 1.11 be
>> required, yaaay parallel parsing) but since we can't tell 1.10.0 from .1 and
>> I don't think this week (since that's just a few more days) is too bad.
>>  Chris, when can you do a 1.10.2?
>
> I might be able to get to it today.  We really need to make the
> process more automated.  We should also stop using berlios for bitbake
> release tarballs and just rely on the oe site / freshmeat / cgit, imo.

our cgit now has the possibility to download tarballs so proabably
just pointing to cgit ?
e.g. http://git.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/bitbake/snapshot/bitbake-1.10.1.tar.bz2
is there
and so are others

> --
> Christopher Larson
> clarson at kergoth dot com
> Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus
> Maintainer - Tslib
> Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>

Re: [PATCH] sanity: release 2010.12 is out, so bump minimum bitbake to 1.10.0 per TSC decision

[Chris Larson]

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Chris Larson <clarson@kergoth.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Tom Rini <tom_rini@mentor.com> wrote:
>>> I agree and would like it done soon too (well, I'd almost rather see 1.11 be
>>> required, yaaay parallel parsing) but since we can't tell 1.10.0 from .1 and
>>> I don't think this week (since that's just a few more days) is too bad.
>>>  Chris, when can you do a 1.10.2?
>>
>> I might be able to get to it today.  We really need to make the
>> process more automated.  We should also stop using berlios for bitbake
>> release tarballs and just rely on the oe site / freshmeat / cgit, imo.
>
> our cgit now has the possibility to download tarballs so proabably
> just pointing to cgit ?
> e.g. http://git.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/bitbake/snapshot/bitbake-1.10.1.tar.bz2
>
> is there
> and so are others

This won't work, unless we want to cause problems for other distros
the way upstreams do for us.  gzip includes timestamp information, if
you wget bitbake-1.10.1.tar.gz twice with over a second between, you
get tarballs with two different md5sums.  We need pristine, specific,
always locked down archives for releases.
-- 
Christopher Larson
clarson at kergoth dot com
Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus
Maintainer - Tslib
Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics

Re: [PATCH] sanity: release 2010.12 is out, so bump minimum bitbake to 1.10.0 per TSC decision

[Koen Kooi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 22-12-10 12:14, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <koen@openembedded.org>
> ---
>  conf/sanity.conf |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/conf/sanity.conf b/conf/sanity.conf
> index 0f53cb2..1c83c14 100644
> --- a/conf/sanity.conf
> +++ b/conf/sanity.conf
> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>  # See sanity.bbclass
>  #
>  # Expert users can confirm their sanity with "touch conf/sanity.conf"
> -BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.8.18"
> +BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.10.0"
>  
>  SANITY_ABIFILE = "${TMPDIR}/abi_version"
>  SANITY_PRFILE = "${TMPDIR}/distro_pr"

If people are agreeing, can I get some Acked-by lines please?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFNElOaMkyGM64RGpERAgvLAJ9CFKK5yUiCxG7H4tcRq2OKpDDb1QCfSHz3
7fCKAbIj8QYD8XO8IoJg2Nc=
=ZtSj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [PATCH] sanity: release 2010.12 is out, so bump minimum bitbake to 1.10.0 per TSC decision

[Martin Jansa]

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 08:38:02PM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 22-12-10 12:14, Koen Kooi wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <koen@openembedded.org>
> > ---
> >  conf/sanity.conf |    2 +-
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/conf/sanity.conf b/conf/sanity.conf
> > index 0f53cb2..1c83c14 100644
> > --- a/conf/sanity.conf
> > +++ b/conf/sanity.conf
> > @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
> >  # See sanity.bbclass
> >  #
> >  # Expert users can confirm their sanity with "touch conf/sanity.conf"
> > -BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.8.18"
> > +BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.10.0"
> >  
> >  SANITY_ABIFILE = "${TMPDIR}/abi_version"
> >  SANITY_PRFILE = "${TMPDIR}/distro_pr"
> 
> If people are agreeing, can I get some Acked-by lines please?

Acked-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>

(also in favor of any 1.10.* version)

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
> 
> iD8DBQFNElOaMkyGM64RGpERAgvLAJ9CFKK5yUiCxG7H4tcRq2OKpDDb1QCfSHz3
> 7fCKAbIj8QYD8XO8IoJg2Nc=
> =ZtSj
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

Re: [PATCH] sanity: release 2010.12 is out, so bump minimum bitbake to 1.10.0 per TSC decision

[Tom Rini]

On 12/22/2010 12:38 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 22-12-10 12:14, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi<koen@openembedded.org>
>> ---
>>   conf/sanity.conf |    2 +-
>>   1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/conf/sanity.conf b/conf/sanity.conf
>> index 0f53cb2..1c83c14 100644
>> --- a/conf/sanity.conf
>> +++ b/conf/sanity.conf
>> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>>   # See sanity.bbclass
>>   #
>>   # Expert users can confirm their sanity with "touch conf/sanity.conf"
>> -BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.8.18"
>> +BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.10.0"
>>
>>   SANITY_ABIFILE = "${TMPDIR}/abi_version"
>>   SANITY_PRFILE = "${TMPDIR}/distro_pr"
>
> If people are agreeing, can I get some Acked-by lines please?

I agree with the concept but I want a patch that says 1.10.2 once Chris 
releases that hopefully later today.

-- 
Tom Rini
Mentor Graphics Corporation

Re: [PATCH] sanity: release 2010.12 is out, so bump minimum bitbake to 1.10.0 per TSC decision

[Frans Meulenbroeks]

2010/12/22 Tom Rini <tom_rini@mentor.com>:
> On 12/22/2010 12:38 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 22-12-10 12:14, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi<koen@openembedded.org>
>>> ---
>>>  conf/sanity.conf |    2 +-
>>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/conf/sanity.conf b/conf/sanity.conf
>>> index 0f53cb2..1c83c14 100644
>>> --- a/conf/sanity.conf
>>> +++ b/conf/sanity.conf
>>> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>>>  # See sanity.bbclass
>>>  #
>>>  # Expert users can confirm their sanity with "touch conf/sanity.conf"
>>> -BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.8.18"
>>> +BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.10.0"
>>>
>>>  SANITY_ABIFILE = "${TMPDIR}/abi_version"
>>>  SANITY_PRFILE = "${TMPDIR}/distro_pr"
>>
>> If people are agreeing, can I get some Acked-by lines please?
>
> I agree with the concept but I want a patch that says 1.10.2 once Chris
> releases that hopefully later today.

I second this.
Frans

Re: [PATCH] sanity: release 2010.12 is out, so bump minimum bitbake to 1.10.0 per TSC decision

[Tom Rini]

On 12/22/2010 01:05 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On 12/22/2010 12:38 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 22-12-10 12:14, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi<koen@openembedded.org>
>>> ---
>>> conf/sanity.conf | 2 +-
>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/conf/sanity.conf b/conf/sanity.conf
>>> index 0f53cb2..1c83c14 100644
>>> --- a/conf/sanity.conf
>>> +++ b/conf/sanity.conf
>>> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>>> # See sanity.bbclass
>>> #
>>> # Expert users can confirm their sanity with "touch conf/sanity.conf"
>>> -BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.8.18"
>>> +BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.10.0"
>>>
>>> SANITY_ABIFILE = "${TMPDIR}/abi_version"
>>> SANITY_PRFILE = "${TMPDIR}/distro_pr"
>>
>> If people are agreeing, can I get some Acked-by lines please?
>
> I agree with the concept but I want a patch that says 1.10.2 once Chris
> releases that hopefully later today.

To be clear, this is because 1.10.0 has some bugs that aren't all that 
hard to hit and 1.10.1 reports itself as 1.10.0.  I strongly suspect we 
have users that stay on the trailing edge, would get 1.10.0 release and 
hit issues.

-- 
Tom Rini
Mentor Graphics Corporation

Re: [PATCH] sanity: release 2010.12 is out, so bump minimum bitbake to 1.10.0 per TSC decision

[Khem Raj]

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Tom Rini <tom_rini@mentor.com> wrote:
> On 12/22/2010 01:05 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>
>> On 12/22/2010 12:38 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>>
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On 22-12-10 12:14, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi<koen@openembedded.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> conf/sanity.conf | 2 +-
>>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/conf/sanity.conf b/conf/sanity.conf
>>>> index 0f53cb2..1c83c14 100644
>>>> --- a/conf/sanity.conf
>>>> +++ b/conf/sanity.conf
>>>> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>>>> # See sanity.bbclass
>>>> #
>>>> # Expert users can confirm their sanity with "touch conf/sanity.conf"
>>>> -BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.8.18"
>>>> +BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.10.0"
>>>>
>>>> SANITY_ABIFILE = "${TMPDIR}/abi_version"
>>>> SANITY_PRFILE = "${TMPDIR}/distro_pr"
>>>
>>> If people are agreeing, can I get some Acked-by lines please?
>>
>> I agree with the concept but I want a patch that says 1.10.2 once Chris
>> releases that hopefully later today.
>
> To be clear, this is because 1.10.0 has some bugs that aren't all that hard
> to hit and 1.10.1 reports itself as 1.10.0.  I strongly suspect we have
> users that stay on the trailing edge, would get 1.10.0 release and hit
> issues.

For 1.10.2

Acked-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>

Re: [PATCH] sanity: release 2010.12 is out, so bump minimum bitbake to 1.10.0 per TSC decision

[Denys Dmytriyenko]

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 02:42:31PM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Tom Rini <tom_rini@mentor.com> wrote:
> > On 12/22/2010 01:05 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >>
> >> On 12/22/2010 12:38 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >>>
> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >>> Hash: SHA1
> >>>
> >>> On 22-12-10 12:14, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi<koen@openembedded.org>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> conf/sanity.conf | 2 +-
> >>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/conf/sanity.conf b/conf/sanity.conf
> >>>> index 0f53cb2..1c83c14 100644
> >>>> --- a/conf/sanity.conf
> >>>> +++ b/conf/sanity.conf
> >>>> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
> >>>> # See sanity.bbclass
> >>>> #
> >>>> # Expert users can confirm their sanity with "touch conf/sanity.conf"
> >>>> -BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.8.18"
> >>>> +BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.10.0"
> >>>>
> >>>> SANITY_ABIFILE = "${TMPDIR}/abi_version"
> >>>> SANITY_PRFILE = "${TMPDIR}/distro_pr"
> >>>
> >>> If people are agreeing, can I get some Acked-by lines please?
> >>
> >> I agree with the concept but I want a patch that says 1.10.2 once Chris
> >> releases that hopefully later today.
> >
> > To be clear, this is because 1.10.0 has some bugs that aren't all that hard
> > to hit and 1.10.1 reports itself as 1.10.0.  I strongly suspect we have
> > users that stay on the trailing edge, would get 1.10.0 release and hit
> > issues.
> 
> For 1.10.2
> 
> Acked-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>

Let's wait for 1.10.2, but:

Acked-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>

-- 
Denys

Re: [PATCH] sanity: release 2010.12 is out, so bump minimum bitbake to 1.10.0 per TSC decision

[Frans Meulenbroeks]

2010/12/23 Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 02:42:31PM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Tom Rini <tom_rini@mentor.com> wrote:
>> > On 12/22/2010 01:05 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 12/22/2010 12:38 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> >>> Hash: SHA1
>> >>>
>> >>> On 22-12-10 12:14, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi<koen@openembedded.org>
>> >>>> ---
>> >>>> conf/sanity.conf | 2 +-
>> >>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> diff --git a/conf/sanity.conf b/conf/sanity.conf
>> >>>> index 0f53cb2..1c83c14 100644
>> >>>> --- a/conf/sanity.conf
>> >>>> +++ b/conf/sanity.conf
>> >>>> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>> >>>> # See sanity.bbclass
>> >>>> #
>> >>>> # Expert users can confirm their sanity with "touch conf/sanity.conf"
>> >>>> -BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.8.18"
>> >>>> +BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.10.0"
>> >>>>
>> >>>> SANITY_ABIFILE = "${TMPDIR}/abi_version"
>> >>>> SANITY_PRFILE = "${TMPDIR}/distro_pr"
>> >>>
>> >>> If people are agreeing, can I get some Acked-by lines please?
>> >>
>> >> I agree with the concept but I want a patch that says 1.10.2 once Chris
>> >> releases that hopefully later today.
>> >
>> > To be clear, this is because 1.10.0 has some bugs that aren't all that hard
>> > to hit and 1.10.1 reports itself as 1.10.0.  I strongly suspect we have
>> > users that stay on the trailing edge, would get 1.10.0 release and hit
>> > issues.
>>
>> For 1.10.2
>>
>> Acked-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
>
> Let's wait for 1.10.2, but:
>
> Acked-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>

For 1.10.2
Acked-by: Frans Meulenbroeks <fransmeulenbroeks@gmail.com>