From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: qemu vs. kvm: When to flush the coalesced mmio buffer?
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 13:34:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D21C244.10901@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D21C1D0.6060301@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 686 bytes --]
Am 03.01.2011 13:32, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/03/2011 02:11 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Hi again,
>>
>> another subtle difference between qemu-kvm and upstream:
>>
>> When we leave the guest for an IO window (KVM_RUN returns EINTR or
>> EAGAIN), we call kvm_flush_coalesced_mmio_buffer in qemu-kvm but not in
>> upstream. When version is better? I can't find any rationales in both
>> git logs.
>
> We must flush on EINTR, otherwise a live migration can leave some mmios
> in the source host and not replay them on the destination host.
>
> (plus, as Gleb says, if you're in userspace you might as well flush)
>
OK, will append a fix to my series.
Thanks,
Jan
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 259 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu vs. kvm: When to flush the coalesced mmio buffer?
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 13:34:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D21C244.10901@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D21C1D0.6060301@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 686 bytes --]
Am 03.01.2011 13:32, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/03/2011 02:11 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Hi again,
>>
>> another subtle difference between qemu-kvm and upstream:
>>
>> When we leave the guest for an IO window (KVM_RUN returns EINTR or
>> EAGAIN), we call kvm_flush_coalesced_mmio_buffer in qemu-kvm but not in
>> upstream. When version is better? I can't find any rationales in both
>> git logs.
>
> We must flush on EINTR, otherwise a live migration can leave some mmios
> in the source host and not replay them on the destination host.
>
> (plus, as Gleb says, if you're in userspace you might as well flush)
>
OK, will append a fix to my series.
Thanks,
Jan
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 259 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-03 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-03 12:11 qemu vs. kvm: When to flush the coalesced mmio buffer? Jan Kiszka
2011-01-03 12:11 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2011-01-03 12:25 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-01-03 12:25 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-01-03 12:32 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-03 12:32 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2011-01-03 12:34 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2011-01-03 12:34 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D21C244.10901@web.de \
--to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.