All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Hannemann <arnd@arndnet.de>
To: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Ian Molton <ian@mnementh.co.uk>,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] mmc: tmio: handle missing HW interrupts
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 23:31:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D24F124.9000303@arndnet.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110105212223.GJ9198@void.printf.net>

Hi Chris,

Am 05.01.2011 22:22, schrieb Chris Ball:
> Hi Arnd,
> 
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 02:21:13PM +0100, Arnd Hannemann wrote:
>> This patch addresses this problem by introducing timeouts for outstanding
>> interrupts. If a hardware interrupt is missing, a soft reset will be performed
>> to bring the hardware back to a working state.
>> Tested with the SDHI hardware block in sh7372 / AP4EVB.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Hannemann <arnd@arndnet.de>
> 
> This breaks compilation without CONFIG_TMIO_MMC_DMA=y, because it
> attempts to compile tmio_mmc_reset_work() unconditionally even though
> delayed_reset_work is only a member of tmio_mmc_host if TMIO_MMC_DMA=y:
> 
> drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc.c: In function ‘tmio_mmc_reset_work’:
> drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc.c:357:31: error: ‘struct tmio_mmc_host’ has no member named ‘delayed_reset_work’

Hmm, I could not reproduce this.
delayed_reset_work should not be in the #ifdef TMIO_MMC_DMA #endif scope.
And it isn't according to the patch.

I tried with mmc-next last commit "549bad416ef62f09711cb22e77adff029e27ce07".
The patch would apply with some fuzz, but compilation without CONFIG_TMIO_MMC_DMA=y works.

With what tree and .config did you try?

Maybe I confused you with my email mentioning the older patches, did you try the (rebased) v2:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/439421/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/439431/


Thanks
Arnd

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Hannemann <arnd@arndnet.de>
To: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Ian Molton <ian@mnementh.co.uk>,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] mmc: tmio: handle missing HW interrupts
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 22:31:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D24F124.9000303@arndnet.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110105212223.GJ9198@void.printf.net>

Hi Chris,

Am 05.01.2011 22:22, schrieb Chris Ball:
> Hi Arnd,
> 
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 02:21:13PM +0100, Arnd Hannemann wrote:
>> This patch addresses this problem by introducing timeouts for outstanding
>> interrupts. If a hardware interrupt is missing, a soft reset will be performed
>> to bring the hardware back to a working state.
>> Tested with the SDHI hardware block in sh7372 / AP4EVB.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Hannemann <arnd@arndnet.de>
> 
> This breaks compilation without CONFIG_TMIO_MMC_DMA=y, because it
> attempts to compile tmio_mmc_reset_work() unconditionally even though
> delayed_reset_work is only a member of tmio_mmc_host if TMIO_MMC_DMA=y:
> 
> drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc.c: In function ‘tmio_mmc_reset_work’:
> drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc.c:357:31: error: ‘struct tmio_mmc_host’ has no member named ‘delayed_reset_work’

Hmm, I could not reproduce this.
delayed_reset_work should not be in the #ifdef TMIO_MMC_DMA #endif scope.
And it isn't according to the patch.

I tried with mmc-next last commit "549bad416ef62f09711cb22e77adff029e27ce07".
The patch would apply with some fuzz, but compilation without CONFIG_TMIO_MMC_DMA=y works.

With what tree and .config did you try?

Maybe I confused you with my email mentioning the older patches, did you try the (rebased) v2:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/439421/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/439431/


Thanks
Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-05 22:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-29 13:21 [PATCH 0/2 v2] mmc: tmio: handle missing HW interrupts Arnd Hannemann
2010-12-29 13:21 ` Arnd Hannemann
2010-12-29 13:21 ` [PATCH 1/2 " Arnd Hannemann
2010-12-29 13:21   ` Arnd Hannemann
2011-01-05 21:22   ` Chris Ball
2011-01-05 21:22     ` Chris Ball
2011-01-05 22:31     ` Arnd Hannemann [this message]
2011-01-05 22:31       ` Arnd Hannemann
2011-01-05 22:44       ` Chris Ball
2011-01-05 22:44         ` Chris Ball
2010-12-29 13:21 ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] mmc: tmio: fix CMD irq handling Arnd Hannemann
2010-12-29 13:21   ` Arnd Hannemann
2011-01-05 22:48   ` Chris Ball
2011-01-05 22:48     ` Chris Ball

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D24F124.9000303@arndnet.de \
    --to=arnd@arndnet.de \
    --cc=cjb@laptop.org \
    --cc=ian@mnementh.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.