From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: return error number to caller
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 19:56:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D2DF944.8060407@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1293407904-31464-3-git-send-email-fw@strlen.de>
Hi Florian,
I've got some questions and comments on this patchset, please see below.
On 27/12/10 00:58, Florian Westphal wrote:
> instead of returning -1 on error, return an error number to allow the
> caller to handle some errors differently.
>
> To make things simpler try_module_get() failure is no longer special-cased.
>
> The new return values will be used in followup patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
> ---
> net/netfilter/core.c | 5 +--
> net/netfilter/nf_queue.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c | 22 +++++++++++------
> 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/core.c b/net/netfilter/core.c
> index 32fcbe2..518a2e3 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/core.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/core.c
> @@ -179,9 +179,8 @@ next_hook:
> if (ret == 0)
> ret = -EPERM;
> } else if ((verdict & NF_VERDICT_MASK) == NF_QUEUE) {
> - if (!nf_queue(skb, elem, pf, hook, indev, outdev, okfn,
> - verdict >> NF_VERDICT_BITS))
> - goto next_hook;
> + nf_queue(skb, elem, pf, hook, indev, outdev, okfn,
> + verdict >> NF_VERDICT_BITS);
You have to remove the next_hook label if you want to do this.
It's not clear to me why we need to remove the goto jump, could you
clarify this?
> }
> rcu_read_unlock();
> return ret;
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c b/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c
> index 74aebed..a417458 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c
> @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static int __nf_queue(struct sk_buff *skb,
> int (*okfn)(struct sk_buff *),
> unsigned int queuenum)
> {
> - int status;
> + int error = -EINVAL;
Please, don't rename this variable unless that you have a good reason to
do so. Better keep the same name to reduce the number of lines that has
changed in this patch.
> struct nf_queue_entry *entry = NULL;
> #ifdef CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER
> struct net_device *physindev;
> @@ -136,8 +136,10 @@ static int __nf_queue(struct sk_buff *skb,
> goto err_unlock;
here above there's the following:
qh = rcu_dereference(queue_handler[pf]);
if (!qh)
goto err_unlock;
afinfo = nf_get_afinfo(pf);
if (!afinfo)
goto err_unlock;
With your patch, we're returning -EINVAL. I think it's better to return
-ENOENT.
> entry = kmalloc(sizeof(*entry) + afinfo->route_key_size, GFP_ATOMIC);
> - if (!entry)
> + if (!entry) {
> + error = -ENOMEM;
> goto err_unlock;
> + }
>
> *entry = (struct nf_queue_entry) {
> .skb = skb,
> @@ -149,12 +151,8 @@ static int __nf_queue(struct sk_buff *skb,
> .okfn = okfn,
> };
>
> - /* If it's going away, ignore hook. */
> - if (!try_module_get(entry->elem->owner)) {
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> - kfree(entry);
> - return 0;
> - }
> + if (!try_module_get(entry->elem->owner))
> + goto err_unlock;
With this change, we're now releasing the skb, is this deliberate?
> /* Bump dev refs so they don't vanish while packet is out */
> if (indev)
> @@ -173,23 +171,23 @@ static int __nf_queue(struct sk_buff *skb,
> #endif
> skb_dst_force(skb);
> afinfo->saveroute(skb, entry);
> - status = qh->outfn(entry, queuenum);
> + error = qh->outfn(entry, queuenum);
>
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> - if (status < 0) {
> + if (error < 0) {
> nf_queue_entry_release_refs(entry);
> goto err;
> }
>
> - return 1;
> + return 0;
>
> err_unlock:
> rcu_read_unlock();
> err:
> kfree_skb(skb);
> kfree(entry);
> - return 1;
> + return error;
> }
>
> int nf_queue(struct sk_buff *skb,
> @@ -201,6 +199,8 @@ int nf_queue(struct sk_buff *skb,
> unsigned int queuenum)
> {
> struct sk_buff *segs;
> + int error = 0;
> + unsigned int queued;
>
> if (!skb_is_gso(skb))
> return __nf_queue(skb, elem, pf, hook, indev, outdev, okfn,
> @@ -218,18 +218,26 @@ int nf_queue(struct sk_buff *skb,
> segs = skb_gso_segment(skb, 0);
> kfree_skb(skb);
> if (IS_ERR(segs))
> - return 1;
> + return -ENOMEM;
Better propagate the error of skb_gso_segment(...) with PTR_ERR()
> + queued = 0;
> do {
> struct sk_buff *nskb = segs->next;
>
> segs->next = NULL;
> - if (!__nf_queue(segs, elem, pf, hook, indev, outdev, okfn,
> - queuenum))
> - kfree_skb(segs);
> + if (error == 0) {
> + error = __nf_queue(segs, elem, pf, hook, indev,
> + outdev, okfn, queuenum);
> + if (error == 0)
> + queued++;
> + }
> + kfree_skb(segs);
Before this patch, segs were only released if try_module_get() failed.
Now it always release it?
> segs = nskb;
> } while (segs);
> - return 1;
> +
> + if (unlikely(error && queued))
> + error = 0;
> + return error;
> }
>
> void nf_reinject(struct nf_queue_entry *entry, unsigned int verdict)
> @@ -237,6 +245,7 @@ void nf_reinject(struct nf_queue_entry *entry, unsigned int verdict)
> struct sk_buff *skb = entry->skb;
> struct list_head *elem = &entry->elem->list;
> const struct nf_afinfo *afinfo;
> + int err;
>
> rcu_read_lock();
>
> @@ -270,10 +279,9 @@ void nf_reinject(struct nf_queue_entry *entry, unsigned int verdict)
> local_bh_enable();
> break;
> case NF_QUEUE:
> - if (!__nf_queue(skb, elem, entry->pf, entry->hook,
> - entry->indev, entry->outdev, entry->okfn,
> - verdict >> NF_VERDICT_BITS))
> - goto next_hook;
> + __nf_queue(skb, elem, entry->pf, entry->hook,
> + entry->indev, entry->outdev, entry->okfn,
> + verdict >> NF_VERDICT_BITS);
Again, the next_label was not removed.
> break;
> case NF_STOLEN:
> default:
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c
> index 68e67d1..b83123f 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c
> @@ -387,25 +387,31 @@ nfqnl_enqueue_packet(struct nf_queue_entry *entry, unsigned int queuenum)
> {
> struct sk_buff *nskb;
> struct nfqnl_instance *queue;
> - int err;
> + int err = -ENOBUFS;
>
> /* rcu_read_lock()ed by nf_hook_slow() */
> queue = instance_lookup(queuenum);
> - if (!queue)
> + if (!queue) {
> + err = -ESRCH;
> goto err_out;
> + }
>
> - if (queue->copy_mode == NFQNL_COPY_NONE)
> + if (queue->copy_mode == NFQNL_COPY_NONE) {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> goto err_out;
> + }
>
> nskb = nfqnl_build_packet_message(queue, entry);
> - if (nskb == NULL)
> + if (nskb == NULL) {
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> goto err_out;
> -
> + }
> spin_lock_bh(&queue->lock);
>
> - if (!queue->peer_pid)
> + if (!queue->peer_pid) {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> goto err_out_free_nskb;
> -
> + }
> if (queue->queue_total >= queue->queue_maxlen) {
> queue->queue_dropped++;
> if (net_ratelimit())
> @@ -432,7 +438,7 @@ err_out_free_nskb:
> err_out_unlock:
> spin_unlock_bh(&queue->lock);
> err_out:
> - return -1;
> + return err;
> }
>
> static int
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-12 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-26 23:58 [PATCH] NFQUEUE v2 target with 'queue bypass' support Florian Westphal
2010-12-26 23:58 ` [PATCH 1/6] netfilter: kconfig: NFQUEUE is useless without NETFILTER_NETLINK_QUEUE Florian Westphal
2010-12-27 8:41 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-12-27 8:47 ` Michał Mirosław
2010-12-26 23:58 ` [PATCH 2/6] netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: return error number to caller Florian Westphal
2011-01-12 18:56 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2011-01-12 20:49 ` Florian Westphal
2011-01-12 21:59 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-01-13 0:14 ` Florian Westphal
2010-12-26 23:58 ` [PATCH 3/6] netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: do not free skb on error Florian Westphal
2011-01-12 19:01 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-01-12 20:50 ` Florian Westphal
2010-12-26 23:58 ` [PATCH 4/6] netfilter: reduce NF_VERDICT_MASK to 0xff Florian Westphal
2011-01-12 19:02 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-01-12 20:52 ` Florian Westphal
2011-01-14 14:05 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-01-15 14:29 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-01-15 14:33 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-12-26 23:58 ` [PATCH 5/6] netfilter: allow NFQUEUE bypass if no listener is available Florian Westphal
2011-01-12 19:03 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2010-12-26 23:58 ` [PATCH 6/6] netfilter: do not omit re-route check on NF_QUEUE verdict Florian Westphal
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-01-16 13:19 [PATCH v2] NFQUEUE v2 target with 'queue bypass' support Florian Westphal
2011-01-16 13:19 ` [PATCH 2/6] netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: return error number to caller Florian Westphal
2011-01-18 14:27 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D2DF944.8060407@netfilter.org \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.