All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] [RFC 1/2] ath9k: Fix up hardware mode and beacons with multiple vifs.
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:16:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D309307.6040806@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D309086.7070703@openwrt.org>

On 01/14/2011 10:05 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2011-01-14 6:27 PM, greearb at candelatech.com wrote:

>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ath9k.h
>> b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ath9k.h
>> index 3108699..a2da259 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ath9k.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ath9k.h
>> @@ -607,10 +607,15 @@ struct ath_softc {
>> u32 sc_flags; /* SC_OP_* */
>> u16 ps_flags; /* PS_* */
>> u16 curtxpow;
>> - u8 nbcnvifs;
>> - u16 nvifs;
>> bool ps_enabled;
>> bool ps_idle;
>> + short nbcnvifs;
>> + short nvifs;
>> + short naps; /* number of APs */
>> + short nmeshes;
>> + short nstations;
>> + short nwds;
>> + short nadhocs;
>> unsigned long ps_usecount;
>>
>> struct ath_config config;
> Do we really need all those counters? Wouldn't it be better to iterate
> over active interfaces instead?

Well, I like the counters.  If they ever do not match
expected results, it will be a clue that we have bugs
in our setup/teardown/change logic.

Seems we use counters like this for ath5k with good
results, btw.

>> if (!ieee80211_is_beacon(fc) ||
>> - compare_ether_addr(hdr->addr3, common->curbssid))
>> + compare_ether_addr(hdr->addr3, common->curbssid)) {
>> + /* TODO: This doesn't work well if you have stations
>> + * associated to two different APs because curbssid
>> + * is just the last AP that any of the stations associated
>> + * with.
>> + */
>> return;
>> + }
>>
>> if (rx_stats->rs_rssi != ATH9K_RSSI_BAD&& !rx_stats->rs_moreaggr)
>> ATH_RSSI_LPF(aphy->last_rssi, rx_stats->rs_rssi);
> Checking for the STA opmode is correct, this code should not be used for
> STA+AP. For the multi-STA case, it may make sense to process the RSSI
> average per vif and using the minimum for ANI.

Ok.  I'll leave that alone for now.

Thanks,
Ben


-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] [RFC 1/2] ath9k: Fix up hardware mode and beacons with multiple vifs.
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:16:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D309307.6040806@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D309086.7070703@openwrt.org>

On 01/14/2011 10:05 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2011-01-14 6:27 PM, greearb@candelatech.com wrote:

>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ath9k.h
>> b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ath9k.h
>> index 3108699..a2da259 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ath9k.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ath9k.h
>> @@ -607,10 +607,15 @@ struct ath_softc {
>> u32 sc_flags; /* SC_OP_* */
>> u16 ps_flags; /* PS_* */
>> u16 curtxpow;
>> - u8 nbcnvifs;
>> - u16 nvifs;
>> bool ps_enabled;
>> bool ps_idle;
>> + short nbcnvifs;
>> + short nvifs;
>> + short naps; /* number of APs */
>> + short nmeshes;
>> + short nstations;
>> + short nwds;
>> + short nadhocs;
>> unsigned long ps_usecount;
>>
>> struct ath_config config;
> Do we really need all those counters? Wouldn't it be better to iterate
> over active interfaces instead?

Well, I like the counters.  If they ever do not match
expected results, it will be a clue that we have bugs
in our setup/teardown/change logic.

Seems we use counters like this for ath5k with good
results, btw.

>> if (!ieee80211_is_beacon(fc) ||
>> - compare_ether_addr(hdr->addr3, common->curbssid))
>> + compare_ether_addr(hdr->addr3, common->curbssid)) {
>> + /* TODO: This doesn't work well if you have stations
>> + * associated to two different APs because curbssid
>> + * is just the last AP that any of the stations associated
>> + * with.
>> + */
>> return;
>> + }
>>
>> if (rx_stats->rs_rssi != ATH9K_RSSI_BAD&& !rx_stats->rs_moreaggr)
>> ATH_RSSI_LPF(aphy->last_rssi, rx_stats->rs_rssi);
> Checking for the STA opmode is correct, this code should not be used for
> STA+AP. For the multi-STA case, it may make sense to process the RSSI
> average per vif and using the minimum for ANI.

Ok.  I'll leave that alone for now.

Thanks,
Ben


-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com


  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-14 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-14 17:27 [ath9k-devel] [RFC 1/2] ath9k: Fix up hardware mode and beacons with multiple vifs greearb at candelatech.com
2011-01-14 17:27 ` greearb
2011-01-14 17:27 ` [ath9k-devel] [RFC 2/2] ath9k: Add 'misc' file to debugfs, fix queue indexes greearb at candelatech.com
2011-01-14 17:27   ` greearb
2011-01-14 18:05 ` [ath9k-devel] [RFC 1/2] ath9k: Fix up hardware mode and beacons with multiple vifs Felix Fietkau
2011-01-14 18:05   ` Felix Fietkau
2011-01-14 18:16   ` Ben Greear [this message]
2011-01-14 18:16     ` Ben Greear
2011-01-15  1:41   ` Björn Smedman
2011-01-15  1:41     ` Björn Smedman
2011-01-15 14:54     ` Ben Greear
2011-01-15 14:54       ` Ben Greear
2011-01-14 18:58 ` Steve Brown
2011-01-14 18:58   ` Steve Brown
2011-01-14 19:12   ` [ath9k-devel] " Ben Greear
2011-01-14 19:12     ` Ben Greear
2011-01-14 23:19 ` [ath9k-devel] " Björn Smedman
2011-01-14 23:19   ` Björn Smedman
2011-01-14 23:24   ` [ath9k-devel] " Ben Greear
2011-01-14 23:24     ` Ben Greear
2011-01-15  0:55   ` [ath9k-devel] " Steve Brown
2011-01-15  0:55     ` Steve Brown
2011-01-15  1:20     ` Björn Smedman
2011-01-15  1:20       ` Björn Smedman
2011-01-15 11:07       ` Jouni Malinen
2011-01-15 11:07         ` Jouni Malinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D309307.6040806@candelatech.com \
    --to=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.