All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ryan Mallon <ryan@bluewatersys.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c: Add missing IS_ERR test
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 19:56:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D3DD964.9020107@bluewatersys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1295898922-18822-3-git-send-email-julia@diku.dk>

On 01/25/2011 08:55 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Function clk_get, defined just below this code, returns ERR_PTR not NULL in
> an error case.
> 
> The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> 
> // <smpl>
> @r@
> identifier f;
> @@
> f(...) { ... return ERR_PTR(...); }
> 
> @@
> identifier r.f, fld;
> expression x;
> statement S1,S2;
> @@
>  x = f(...)
>  ... when != IS_ERR(x)
> (
>  if (IS_ERR(x) ||...) S1 else S2
> |
> *x->fld
> )
> // </smpl>

I'm always really impressed by this tool :-).

> 
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> 
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c
> index 9113da6..c9ee6d0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c
> @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ void __init at91_clock_associate(const char *id, struct device *dev, const char
>  {
>  	struct clk *clk = clk_get(NULL, id);
>  
> -	if (!dev || !clk || !IS_ERR(clk_get(dev, func)))
> +	if (!dev || IS_ERR(clk) || !IS_ERR(clk_get(dev, func)))
>  		return;

I think we want:

	if (!dev || !clk || IS_ERR(clk) || !IS_ERR(clk_get(dev, func)))
		return;

Since it is valid to return a NULL clk, and we don't want to try and
dereference it if that is the case.

We could also probably drop the !IS_ERR(clk_get(dev, func)) check, since
as far as I can tell it is just checking to see if the clock is already
associated, but there is no harm in re-assigning the same values, and
the two assignments in at91_clock_associate are going to be much quicker
than the lookup in clk_get.

~Ryan

-- 
Bluewater Systems Ltd - ARM Technology Solution Centre

Ryan Mallon         		5 Amuri Park, 404 Barbadoes St
ryan@bluewatersys.com         	PO Box 13 889, Christchurch 8013
http://www.bluewatersys.com	New Zealand
Phone: +64 3 3779127		Freecall: Australia 1800 148 751
Fax:   +64 3 3779135			  USA 1800 261 2934

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ryan@bluewatersys.com (Ryan Mallon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c: Add missing IS_ERR test
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 08:56:20 +1300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D3DD964.9020107@bluewatersys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1295898922-18822-3-git-send-email-julia@diku.dk>

On 01/25/2011 08:55 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Function clk_get, defined just below this code, returns ERR_PTR not NULL in
> an error case.
> 
> The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> 
> // <smpl>
> @r@
> identifier f;
> @@
> f(...) { ... return ERR_PTR(...); }
> 
> @@
> identifier r.f, fld;
> expression x;
> statement S1,S2;
> @@
>  x = f(...)
>  ... when != IS_ERR(x)
> (
>  if (IS_ERR(x) ||...) S1 else S2
> |
> *x->fld
> )
> // </smpl>

I'm always really impressed by this tool :-).

> 
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> 
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c
> index 9113da6..c9ee6d0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c
> @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ void __init at91_clock_associate(const char *id, struct device *dev, const char
>  {
>  	struct clk *clk = clk_get(NULL, id);
>  
> -	if (!dev || !clk || !IS_ERR(clk_get(dev, func)))
> +	if (!dev || IS_ERR(clk) || !IS_ERR(clk_get(dev, func)))
>  		return;

I think we want:

	if (!dev || !clk || IS_ERR(clk) || !IS_ERR(clk_get(dev, func)))
		return;

Since it is valid to return a NULL clk, and we don't want to try and
dereference it if that is the case.

We could also probably drop the !IS_ERR(clk_get(dev, func)) check, since
as far as I can tell it is just checking to see if the clock is already
associated, but there is no harm in re-assigning the same values, and
the two assignments in at91_clock_associate are going to be much quicker
than the lookup in clk_get.

~Ryan

-- 
Bluewater Systems Ltd - ARM Technology Solution Centre

Ryan Mallon         		5 Amuri Park, 404 Barbadoes St
ryan at bluewatersys.com         	PO Box 13 889, Christchurch 8013
http://www.bluewatersys.com	New Zealand
Phone: +64 3 3779127		Freecall: Australia 1800 148 751
Fax:   +64 3 3779135			  USA 1800 261 2934

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ryan Mallon <ryan@bluewatersys.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	Andrew Victor <linux@maxim.org.za>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c: Add missing IS_ERR test
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 08:56:20 +1300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D3DD964.9020107@bluewatersys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1295898922-18822-3-git-send-email-julia@diku.dk>

On 01/25/2011 08:55 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Function clk_get, defined just below this code, returns ERR_PTR not NULL in
> an error case.
> 
> The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> 
> // <smpl>
> @r@
> identifier f;
> @@
> f(...) { ... return ERR_PTR(...); }
> 
> @@
> identifier r.f, fld;
> expression x;
> statement S1,S2;
> @@
>  x = f(...)
>  ... when != IS_ERR(x)
> (
>  if (IS_ERR(x) ||...) S1 else S2
> |
> *x->fld
> )
> // </smpl>

I'm always really impressed by this tool :-).

> 
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> 
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c
> index 9113da6..c9ee6d0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c
> @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ void __init at91_clock_associate(const char *id, struct device *dev, const char
>  {
>  	struct clk *clk = clk_get(NULL, id);
>  
> -	if (!dev || !clk || !IS_ERR(clk_get(dev, func)))
> +	if (!dev || IS_ERR(clk) || !IS_ERR(clk_get(dev, func)))
>  		return;

I think we want:

	if (!dev || !clk || IS_ERR(clk) || !IS_ERR(clk_get(dev, func)))
		return;

Since it is valid to return a NULL clk, and we don't want to try and
dereference it if that is the case.

We could also probably drop the !IS_ERR(clk_get(dev, func)) check, since
as far as I can tell it is just checking to see if the clock is already
associated, but there is no harm in re-assigning the same values, and
the two assignments in at91_clock_associate are going to be much quicker
than the lookup in clk_get.

~Ryan

-- 
Bluewater Systems Ltd - ARM Technology Solution Centre

Ryan Mallon         		5 Amuri Park, 404 Barbadoes St
ryan@bluewatersys.com         	PO Box 13 889, Christchurch 8013
http://www.bluewatersys.com	New Zealand
Phone: +64 3 3779127		Freecall: Australia 1800 148 751
Fax:   +64 3 3779135			  USA 1800 261 2934

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-24 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-24 19:55 [PATCH 0/4] Add missing IS_ERR test Julia Lawall
2011-01-24 19:55 ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-24 19:55 ` [PATCH 1/4] fs/btrfs/inode.c: " Julia Lawall
2011-01-24 19:55   ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-24 19:55 ` [PATCH 2/4] arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c: " Julia Lawall
2011-01-24 19:55   ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-24 19:55   ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-24 19:56   ` Ryan Mallon [this message]
2011-01-24 19:56     ` Ryan Mallon
2011-01-24 19:56     ` Ryan Mallon
2011-01-24 20:00     ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-24 20:00       ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-24 20:00       ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-24 20:05       ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-01-24 20:05         ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-01-24 20:05         ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-01-24 20:09         ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-24 20:09           ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-24 20:09           ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-24 20:14           ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-01-24 20:14             ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-01-24 20:14             ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-01-25 10:33           ` walter harms
2011-01-25 10:33             ` walter harms
2011-01-25 10:33             ` walter harms
2011-01-25 10:43             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 10:43               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 10:43               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 11:12               ` walter harms
2011-01-25 11:12                 ` walter harms
2011-01-25 11:12                 ` walter harms
2011-01-25 11:17                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 11:17                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 11:17                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 11:18                 ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-25 11:18                   ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-25 11:18                   ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-25 11:26                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 11:26                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 11:26                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 11:31                     ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-25 11:31                       ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-25 11:31                       ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-24 20:11         ` Ryan Mallon
2011-01-24 20:11           ` Ryan Mallon
2011-01-24 20:11           ` Ryan Mallon
2011-01-24 20:28           ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-24 20:28             ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-24 20:28             ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-24 20:38             ` Ryan Mallon
2011-01-24 20:38               ` Ryan Mallon
2011-01-24 20:38               ` Ryan Mallon
2011-01-24 21:01               ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-24 21:01                 ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-24 21:01                 ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-24 21:06                 ` Ryan Mallon
2011-01-24 21:06                   ` Ryan Mallon
2011-01-24 21:06                   ` Ryan Mallon
2011-01-24 21:31                   ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-24 21:31                     ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-24 21:31                     ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-24 21:51                     ` Ryan Mallon
2011-01-24 21:51                       ` Ryan Mallon
2011-01-24 21:51                       ` Ryan Mallon
2011-01-24 23:23                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-24 23:23                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-24 23:23                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25  1:44                         ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2011-01-25  1:44                           ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2011-01-25  1:44                           ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2011-01-25  6:12                           ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-25  6:12                             ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-25  6:12                             ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-25 17:23                             ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2011-01-25 17:23                               ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2011-01-25 17:23                               ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2011-01-24 19:55 ` [PATCH 3/4] drivers/video/bf537-lq035.c: " Julia Lawall
2011-01-24 19:55   ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-24 20:43   ` Mike Frysinger
2011-01-24 20:43     ` Mike Frysinger
2011-01-25  6:12     ` Paul Mundt
2011-01-25  6:12       ` Paul Mundt
2011-01-25  8:36   ` Hennerich, Michael
2011-01-25  8:36     ` Hennerich, Michael
2011-01-24 19:55 ` [PATCH 4/4] arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c: " Julia Lawall
2011-01-24 19:55   ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-24 19:55   ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-24 21:24   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-01-24 21:24     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-01-24 21:24     ` Kevin Hilman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D3DD964.9020107@bluewatersys.com \
    --to=ryan@bluewatersys.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.