From: Mark Lord <kernel@teksavvy.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: xfs: very slow after mount, very slow at umount
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:49:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D40EB2F.2050809@teksavvy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110127033011.GH21311@dastard>
On 11-01-26 10:30 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> [Please cc xfs@oss.sgi.com on XFS bug reports. Added.]
>
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 08:22:25PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
>> Alex / Christoph,
>>
>> My mythtv box here uses XFS on a 2TB drive for storing recordings and videos.
>> It is behaving rather strangely though, and has gotten worse recently.
>> Here is what I see happening:
>>
>> The drive mounts fine at boot, but the very first attempt to write a new file
>> to the filesystem suffers from a very very long pause, 30-60 seconds, during which
>> time the disk activity light is fully "on".
>
> Please post the output of xfs_info <mtpt> so we can see what you
> filesystem configuration is.
/dev/sdb1 on /var/lib/mythtv type xfs
(rw,noatime,allocsize=64M,logbufs=8,largeio)
[~] xfs_info /var/lib/mythtv
meta-data=/dev/sdb1 isize=256 agcount=7453, agsize=65536 blks
= sectsz=512 attr=2
data = bsize=4096 blocks=488378638, imaxpct=5
= sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0
log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=32768, version=2
= sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=0
realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
>> This happens only on the first new file write after mounting.
>> From then on, the filesystem is fast and responsive as expected.
>> If I umount the filesystem, and then mount it again,
>> the exact same behaviour can be observed.
>
> I can't say I've seen this. Can you capture a blktrace of the IO so
> we can see what IO is actually being done, and perhaps also record
> an XFS event trace as well (i.e. of all the events in
> /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/xfs).
I'll have to reconfig/rebuild the kernel to include support for blktrace first.
Can you specify the exact commands/args you'd like for running blktrace etc?
>> This of course screws up mythtv, as it causes me to lose the first 30-60
>> seconds of the first recording it attempts after booting. So as a workaround
>> I now have a startup script to create, sync, and delete a 64MB file before
>> starting mythtv. This still takes 30-60 seconds, but it all happens and
>> finishes before mythtv has a real-time need to write to the filesystem.
>>
>> The 2TB drive is fine -- zero errors, no events in the SMART logs,
>> and I've disabled the silly WD head-unload logic on it.
>>
>> What's happening here? Why the big long burst of activity?
>> I've only just noticed this behaviour in the past few weeks,
>> running 2.6.35 and more recently 2.6.37.
>
> Can you be a bit more precise? what were you running before 2.6.35
> when you didn't notice this?
Those details are in my earlier follow-up posting.
>> The other issue is something I notice at umount time.
I'm going to let that issue rest for now,
until we figure out the first issue.
Heck, they might even be the exact same thing.. :)
Thanks!
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Lord <kernel@teksavvy.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: xfs: very slow after mount, very slow at umount
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:49:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D40EB2F.2050809@teksavvy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110127033011.GH21311@dastard>
On 11-01-26 10:30 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> [Please cc xfs@oss.sgi.com on XFS bug reports. Added.]
>
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 08:22:25PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
>> Alex / Christoph,
>>
>> My mythtv box here uses XFS on a 2TB drive for storing recordings and videos.
>> It is behaving rather strangely though, and has gotten worse recently.
>> Here is what I see happening:
>>
>> The drive mounts fine at boot, but the very first attempt to write a new file
>> to the filesystem suffers from a very very long pause, 30-60 seconds, during which
>> time the disk activity light is fully "on".
>
> Please post the output of xfs_info <mtpt> so we can see what you
> filesystem configuration is.
/dev/sdb1 on /var/lib/mythtv type xfs
(rw,noatime,allocsize=64M,logbufs=8,largeio)
[~] xfs_info /var/lib/mythtv
meta-data=/dev/sdb1 isize=256 agcount=7453, agsize=65536 blks
= sectsz=512 attr=2
data = bsize=4096 blocks=488378638, imaxpct=5
= sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0
log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=32768, version=2
= sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=0
realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
>> This happens only on the first new file write after mounting.
>> From then on, the filesystem is fast and responsive as expected.
>> If I umount the filesystem, and then mount it again,
>> the exact same behaviour can be observed.
>
> I can't say I've seen this. Can you capture a blktrace of the IO so
> we can see what IO is actually being done, and perhaps also record
> an XFS event trace as well (i.e. of all the events in
> /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/xfs).
I'll have to reconfig/rebuild the kernel to include support for blktrace first.
Can you specify the exact commands/args you'd like for running blktrace etc?
>> This of course screws up mythtv, as it causes me to lose the first 30-60
>> seconds of the first recording it attempts after booting. So as a workaround
>> I now have a startup script to create, sync, and delete a 64MB file before
>> starting mythtv. This still takes 30-60 seconds, but it all happens and
>> finishes before mythtv has a real-time need to write to the filesystem.
>>
>> The 2TB drive is fine -- zero errors, no events in the SMART logs,
>> and I've disabled the silly WD head-unload logic on it.
>>
>> What's happening here? Why the big long burst of activity?
>> I've only just noticed this behaviour in the past few weeks,
>> running 2.6.35 and more recently 2.6.37.
>
> Can you be a bit more precise? what were you running before 2.6.35
> when you didn't notice this?
Those details are in my earlier follow-up posting.
>> The other issue is something I notice at umount time.
I'm going to let that issue rest for now,
until we figure out the first issue.
Heck, they might even be the exact same thing.. :)
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-27 3:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-27 1:22 xfs: very slow after mount, very slow at umount Mark Lord
2011-01-27 1:43 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 3:43 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-27 3:43 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-27 3:53 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 3:53 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 4:54 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 4:54 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 23:34 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-27 23:34 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-27 3:30 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-27 3:30 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-27 3:49 ` Mark Lord [this message]
2011-01-27 3:49 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 5:17 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-01-27 15:12 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 15:12 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 15:40 ` Justin Piszcz
2011-01-27 15:40 ` Justin Piszcz
2011-01-27 16:03 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 16:03 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 19:40 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-01-27 19:40 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-01-27 20:11 ` david
2011-01-27 20:11 ` david
2011-01-27 23:53 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-01-27 23:53 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-01-28 2:09 ` david
2011-01-28 2:09 ` david
2011-01-28 13:56 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-28 13:56 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-28 19:26 ` david
2011-01-28 19:26 ` david
2011-01-29 5:40 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-29 5:40 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-29 6:08 ` david
2011-01-29 6:08 ` david
2011-01-29 7:35 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-29 7:35 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-31 19:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-01-31 19:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-01-27 21:56 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 21:56 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-28 0:17 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-28 0:17 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-28 1:22 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-28 1:22 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-28 1:36 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-28 1:36 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-28 4:14 ` David Rees
2011-01-28 4:14 ` David Rees
2011-01-28 14:22 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-28 14:22 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-28 7:31 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-28 7:31 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-28 14:33 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-28 14:33 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-28 23:58 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-28 23:58 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-28 19:18 ` Martin Steigerwald
2011-01-28 19:18 ` Martin Steigerwald
2011-01-27 20:24 ` John Stoffel
2011-01-27 20:24 ` John Stoffel
2011-01-27 23:41 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-27 23:41 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-28 0:59 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-28 0:59 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 23:39 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-27 23:39 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D40EB2F.2050809@teksavvy.com \
--to=kernel@teksavvy.com \
--cc=aelder@sgi.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.