From: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
To: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org>
Cc: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org,
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] mmc: add double buffering for mmc block requests
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:23:43 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D45200F.9090007@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=H71TQpuBnagMThcv-6NKJyqsD-xtg_eW8Pb_T@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Per.
If you sketch a implementation for sdhci. i can test the patches on the Samsung Soc
Your help is very nice for me :).i want to know how much improve the performance
after applied your patch.
Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
Per Forlin wrote:
> Hi Jaehoon,
>
> Have you had the chance to test the patches on the Samsung Soc. I can
> sketch a implementation for sdhci if that helps? Unfortunately I don't
> have any hardware to test the SDHCI driver unless there is support in
> QEMU?
> I really think I need to test this on more hardware in order to get
> more results for the patchset and hopefully more attention as well.
>
> BR
> Per
>
> On 18 January 2011 09:12, Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 18 January 2011 03:35, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Per..
>>>
>>> it is interesting approach..so
>>> we want to test your double buffering in our environment(Samsung SoC).
>>>
>>> Did you test with SDHCI?
>> So far I have only tested on mmci for board u5500 and u8500. I happily
>> test on a different board if I can get hold of one.
>>
>>> If you tested with SDHCI, i want to know how much increase the performance.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jaehoon Chung
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jh80.chung@samsung.com (Jaehoon Chung)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] mmc: add double buffering for mmc block requests
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:23:43 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D45200F.9090007@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=H71TQpuBnagMThcv-6NKJyqsD-xtg_eW8Pb_T@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Per.
If you sketch a implementation for sdhci. i can test the patches on the Samsung Soc
Your help is very nice for me :).i want to know how much improve the performance
after applied your patch.
Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
Per Forlin wrote:
> Hi Jaehoon,
>
> Have you had the chance to test the patches on the Samsung Soc. I can
> sketch a implementation for sdhci if that helps? Unfortunately I don't
> have any hardware to test the SDHCI driver unless there is support in
> QEMU?
> I really think I need to test this on more hardware in order to get
> more results for the patchset and hopefully more attention as well.
>
> BR
> Per
>
> On 18 January 2011 09:12, Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 18 January 2011 03:35, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Per..
>>>
>>> it is interesting approach..so
>>> we want to test your double buffering in our environment(Samsung SoC).
>>>
>>> Did you test with SDHCI?
>> So far I have only tested on mmci for board u5500 and u8500. I happily
>> test on a different board if I can get hold of one.
>>
>>> If you tested with SDHCI, i want to know how much increase the performance.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jaehoon Chung
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-30 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-12 18:13 [PATCH 0/5] mmc: add double buffering for mmc block requests Per Forlin
2011-01-12 18:13 ` Per Forlin
2011-01-12 18:13 ` [PATCH 1/5] mmc: add member in mmc queue struct to hold request data Per Forlin
2011-01-12 18:13 ` Per Forlin
2011-01-12 18:14 ` [PATCH 2/5] mmc: Add a block request prepare function Per Forlin
2011-01-12 18:14 ` Per Forlin
2011-01-12 18:14 ` [PATCH 3/5] mmc: Add a second mmc queue request member Per Forlin
2011-01-12 18:14 ` Per Forlin
2011-01-12 18:14 ` [PATCH 4/5] mmc: Store the mmc block request struct in mmc queue Per Forlin
2011-01-12 18:14 ` Per Forlin
2011-01-12 18:14 ` [PATCH 5/5] mmc: Add double buffering for mmc block requests Per Forlin
2011-01-12 18:14 ` Per Forlin
2011-01-12 18:24 ` [PATCH 0/5] mmc: add " Per Forlin
2011-01-12 18:24 ` Per Forlin
2011-01-18 2:35 ` Jaehoon Chung
2011-01-18 2:35 ` Jaehoon Chung
2011-01-18 8:12 ` Per Forlin
2011-01-18 8:12 ` Per Forlin
[not found] ` <AANLkTimjfO4Wb0f87X_sDugW=yU1=YEQn35uZnsKKwq2-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-28 8:28 ` Per Forlin
2011-01-28 8:28 ` Per Forlin
2011-01-28 8:28 ` Per Forlin
2011-01-30 8:23 ` Jaehoon Chung [this message]
2011-01-30 8:23 ` Jaehoon Chung
2011-02-05 17:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-05 17:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-05 20:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-05 20:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D45200F.9090007@samsung.com \
--to=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=per.forlin@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.